UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549 
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION 
 
         Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant  þ        Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ¨
Check the appropriate box:
¨ Preliminary Proxy Statement
¨ Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
þ Definitive Proxy Statement
¨ Definitive Additional Materials
¨ Soliciting Material under Rule 14a-12
CHEMICAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

(Name of person(s) filing proxy statement, if other than the registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
þ No fee required.
¨ Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
(1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)Total fee paid:

¨ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
¨ Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1)Amount Previously Paid:

(2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)Filing Party:

(4)Date Filed:

     


March 10, 2017
 
chemlogoa01.jpgcfc2rgb.jpg
235 East Main333 W. Fort Street, Suite 1800
Midland,Detroit, Michigan 48640
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
To Be Held April 26, 2017May 7, 2019

To Our Shareholders:
The 2017I cordially invite you to attend the 2019 annual meeting of shareholders of Chemical Financial Corporation willto be held at the MidlandCobo Center, 1 Washington Boulevard, Detroit, Michigan, on Tuesday, May 7, 2019, at 3:30 p.m. local time, for the Arts, 1801 W. St. Andrews Drive, Midland, Michigan, on Wednesday, April 26, 2017, at 2:00 p.m. local time. At the meeting, we will consider and vote on:following purposes:
1.Election of 12to elect 13 directors;
2.Amendment of our Restated Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of our common stock from 100,000,000 shares to 135,000,000 shares;
3.Approval of the Stock Incentive Plan of 2017;
4.Ratification ofratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2017;2019;
5.3.Advisory approvalto conduct an advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive compensation;officers; and
6.4.Advisory vote onto approve the frequencyChemical Financial Corporation Stock Incentive Plan of the advisory approval of executive compensation.2019.
We will also conduct any other business that properly comes before the meeting or at any adjournment of the meeting.
You are receiving this notice and can vote at the meeting and any adjournment of the meeting if you were a shareholder of record as of the close of business on February 27, 2017.March 12, 2019. The enclosed proxy statement and proxy are first being sent to our shareholders on approximately March 10, 2017.26, 2019. A copy of our annual report for the year ended December 31, 20162018 is enclosed with this notice.
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder Meeting to be Held on April 26, 2017.May 7, 2019. OurAgain this year, we are taking advantage of the rules of the SEC that allow us to furnish our proxy statement and annual report formaterials over the year ended December 31, 2016, which accompany this notice,Internet. We are available for viewing, printing and downloadingmailing to our shareholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, rather than mailing a full paper set of the materials. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials contains instructions on how to access our proxy materials on the internet at Internet, as well as instructions on obtaining a paper or email copy of the proxy materials. This process will reduce our costs to print and distribute our proxy materials.
www.edocumentview.com/chfcWe urge you to please vote your shares now whether or not you plan to attend the meeting. Voting by the Internet or telephone is fast and convenient, and your vote is immediately confirmed and tabulated. If you request to receive a paper copy of the proxy materials, you may also vote by completing, signing, dating and returning the accompanying proxy card in the “Investor Information” section of our website, www.chemicalbankmi.com,enclosed return envelope furnished for that purpose. By using the Internet or voting by clicking the 2017 Proxy Statementtelephone, you help us reduce postage and 2016 Annual Report links, respectively. In addition, you may obtain electronic copies of all of our filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission during the last five years from this section of our website.proxy tabulation costs.
We look forward to seeing you at the meeting.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
dramakera04.jpgdavidprovostsignaturea01.jpg
David B. RamakerT. Provost
Chief Executive Officer and President
March 10, 201726, 2019
Your vote is important.
Even if you plan to attend the meeting,
PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY PROMPTLY OR
VOTE BY TELEPHONE OR THE INTERNET.










CHEMICAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION
PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents
Page




CHEMICAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION
PROXY STATEMENT
dated March 10, 201726, 2019
For the Annual Meeting of Shareholders
to be held April 26, 2017May 7, 2019
Introduction
Use of Terms
In this proxy statement, “we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company,”"Chemical," or the “Corporation” and “Chemical Financial” refer to Chemical Financial Corporation, the “Bank” refers to Chemical Bank, and “you” and “your” refer to each shareholder of Chemical Financial Corporation.
Questions and Answers about the Proxy Materials and Our 20172019 Annual Meeting
 Q.
Why am I receiving these materials?
A.
Chemical Financial’sOur board of directors is providing these proxy materials to you in connection with its solicitation of proxies for use at the Chemical Financial Corporation 20172019 annual meeting of shareholders. The meeting will take place on Wednesday, April 26, 2017,Tuesday, May 7, 2019, at 2:003:30 p.m. local time, at the MidlandCobo Center, for the Arts, 1801 W. St. Andrews Drive, Midland,1 Washington Boulevard, Detroit, Michigan. You are invited to attend the meeting and are requested to vote on the proposals described in this proxy statement.
Q.What proposals will be voted on at the annual meeting?
A.
The following proposals are scheduled to be voted on at the annual meeting:
Election of 12 directors (Proposal 1);Proposal 1 – to elect 13 directors;
Amendment of our Restated Articles of IncorporationProposal 2 – to increase the number of authorized shares of our common stock from 100,000,000 shares to 135,000,000 shares (Proposal 2);
Approval of the Stock Incentive Plan of 2017 (Proposal 3);
Ratification ofratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2017 (Proposal 4);2019;
Advisory approvalProposal 3 – to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive compensation (Proposal 5);officers; and
Advisory vote onProposal 4 – to approve the frequencyChemical Financial Corporation Stock Incentive Plan of the advisory approval of executive compensation (Proposal 6).2019.
In addition, any other business that properly comes before the meeting will be considered and voted on. As of the date of this proxy statement, we are not aware of any other matters to be considered and voted on at the meeting. If any other matters are presented, the persons named as proxies on the enclosed proxy will have discretionary authority to vote for you on those matters.
Q.What information is contained in these materials?
A.
The information included in this proxy statement discusses the proposals to be voted on at the meeting, the voting process, the compensation of our directors and named executive officers, and certain other required information. YourIf you requested printed copies of the proxy materials to be sent to you by mail, your proxy, which you may use to vote on the proposals described in this proxy statement, is also enclosed.
Q.When did the Company begin sending and delivering this proxy statement and the enclosed proxy to shareholders?
A.
We began sending and delivering this proxy statement and the enclosed proxyto our shareholders on approximately March 10, 2017.
Q.How does the Company’sChemical board of directors recommend that I vote?
A.
Your board of directors recommends that you vote FOR approval of Proposals 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, and ONE YEAR on Proposal 6.
vote:

FOR each nominee to the board of directors;

FOR the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2019;
FOR the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers; and
FOR the approval of the Chemical Financial Corporation Stock Incentive Plan of 2019.
Q.Who may vote?
A.
You may vote at the annual meeting if you were a shareholder of record of Chemical Financialour common stock at the close of business on February 27, 2017.March 12, 2019. Each shareholder is entitled to one vote per share of Chemical Financialour common stock on each matter presented for a shareholder vote at the meeting. As of February 27, 2017, there were 71,068,446 shares of Chemical Financial common stock issued and outstanding.


shareholder vote at the meeting. As of the March 12, 2019 record date, there were 71,538,472 shares of Chemical common stock issued and outstanding.
We anticipate that the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials will first be sent to shareholders on or about March 26, 2019. The proxy statement and the form of proxy relating to the annual meeting are first being made available to shareholders on or about March 26, 2019.
Q.How doWhy did I vote?receive a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials instead of paper copies of the proxy materials?
A.
Again this year, pursuant to the SEC “Notice and Access” rules, we are furnishing our proxy materials to our shareholders over the Internet instead of mailing each of our shareholders paper copies of those materials. As a result, we will send our shareholders by mail a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, which we refer to as the Notice, containing instructions on how to access our proxy materials over the Internet and how to vote. The Notice is not a ballot or proxy card and cannot be used to vote your shares of common stock. The Notice also tells you how to access your proxy card to vote on the Internet. If you properly signreceived a Notice by mail and returnwould like to receive a printed or email copy of the enclosed proxy materials, please follow the shares representedinstructions included in the Notice. You will not receive paper copies of the proxy materials unless you request the materials by that proxy will be votedfollowing the instructions on the Notice.
If you own shares of common stock in more than one account for example, in a joint account with your spouse and in your individual brokerage account you may have received more than one Notice. To vote all of your shares of common stock, please follow each of the separate proxy voting instructions that you received for your shares of common stock held in each of your different accounts.
Q.What is the quorum requirement for the annual meeting?
A.
To conduct business at the annual meeting, and at any adjournmenta quorum of shareholders must be present. The presence in person or by properly executed proxy of the meeting.holders of a majority of all issued and outstanding shares of our common stock entitled to vote at the meeting is necessary for a quorum. To determine whether a quorum is present, we will include shares that are present or represented by proxy, including abstentions and shares represented by a broker non-vote on any matter.
Q.What are broker non-votes?
A.
Generally, broker non-votes occur when shares held by a broker in street name for a beneficial owner are not voted with respect to a particular proposal because the broker has not received timely voting instructions from the beneficial owner and the broker lacks discretionary voting power to vote those shares. In these cases, the broker can register your shares as being present at the meeting for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum but will not be able to vote on those matters for which specific authorization is required under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange.
Q.Does my broker have discretionary authority to vote my shares?
A.
If you do not provide your broker with voting instructions, then your broker only has discretionary authority to vote your shares on certain “routine” matters. We expect that Proposal 2 will be considered a routine matter and your broker will have discretionary authority to vote your shares on such proposal. Proposals 1, 3 and 4 are not considered routine matters and your broker will not have discretionary authority to vote your shares on these matters. It is important that you promptly provide your broker with voting instructions if you want your shares voted on Proposals 1, 3 and 4.
Q.How do I vote if I hold my shares directly?
A.
If you hold shares in your own name, you may vote by selecting any of the following options:
If you specify a choice on the proxy, your shares will be voted as specified. If you do not specify a choice, your shares will be voted for approval of Proposals 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, and ONE YEAR on Proposal 6. If any other matter comes before the meeting, your shares will be voted at the discretion of the persons named as proxies on the proxy.
If you are a shareholder of record, Chemical Financial also offers you the convenience of voting by telephone or through the Internet, 24 hours a day, seven days a week.
Internet Voting.    You may vote via the Internet 24 hours a day, seven days a week, by visiting www.envisionreports.com/chfc.www.proxypush.com/CHFC. Follow the steps outlined on the secure website.

Telephone Voting.    ToYou may vote via telephone 24 hours a day, seven days a week, by telephone, dialdialing the toll-free number on the instructions included on your proxy and listenlistening for further directions.

By Mail. If you request printed copies of the proxy materials to be sent to you by mail, you can complete the proxy card, date and sign it, and return it in the postage-paid envelope provided.

Shares represented by signed proxies will be voted as instructed. If you sign the proxy but do not mark your vote, your shares will be voted as the directors have recommended.


If you acquired your shares through the stock purchase and dividend reinvestment plan or if you hold your shares in street name, see the instructions below.
Q.How do I vote my shares acquired through the stock purchase and dividend reinvestment plan (Computershare CIP)?
A.If you are enrolled in Chemical Financial’sour stock purchase and dividend reinvestment plan (Computershare CIP), the enclosed proxy covers: (1) all shares of Chemical Financial’sour common stock owned of record by you at the record date, and (2) all shares of Chemical Financial’sour common stock held by you in the Computershare CIP at that time. Computershare, as agent under the Computershare CIP, will vote any common stock held by it under the Computershare CIP in accordance with your written direction as indicated on the proxy. All such shares will be voted the way you direct. If no specific instruction is given on a returned proxy, Computershare will vote as recommended by the board of directors.
Q.How do I vote if I hold my shares in “street name”?
A.
If you hold your shares in “street name,” which means that your shares are registered in the name of a bank, broker or other nominee (which we collectively refer to as your “broker”), your broker must vote your street name shares in the manner you direct if you provide your broker with proper and timely voting instructions. Please use the voting forms and instructions provided by your broker or its agent. These forms and instructions typically permit you to give voting instructions by telephone or the Internet if you wish. If you are a street name holder and want to change your vote, you must contact your broker. Please note that you may not vote shares held in street name in person at the annual meeting unless you request and receive a valid proxy from your broker.
Q.Does my broker have discretionary authority to vote my shares?
A.
If you do not provide your broker with voting instructions, then your broker has discretionary authority to vote your shares on certain “routine” matters. We expect that Proposals 2 and 4 will be considered a routine matter and your broker will have discretionary authority to vote your shares on the proposals. Proposals 1, 3, 5 and 6 are not considered routine matters and your broker will not have discretionary authority to vote your shares on these matters. It is important that you promptly provide your broker with voting instructions if you want your shares voted on Proposals 1, 3, 5 or 6.
Q.Can I change my mind after I return my proxy?
A.
Yes. If you are a shareholder of record (i.e., you hold your shares directly instead of through a brokerage account) and you change your mind after you return your proxy or you vote electronically over the Internet or by telephone, you retain the power to revoke your proxy or change your vote. You may revoke your proxy at any timeor change your vote before it is voted at the meeting by doing either of the following two things:by:
    bytimely delivering written notice of revocation to Chemical Financial’sour Corporate Secretary, William C. Collins, at 235 E. Main Street, Midland, Michigan 48640; 
timely delivering a new valid proxy bearing a later date either by mail, electronic vote over the Internet or by telephone; or
    by attending the meeting and voting in person.

If you hold your shares through a brokerage account, you must contact your brokerage firm to revoke your proxy.

Q.What are broker non-votes?
A.
Generally, broker non-votes occur when shares held by a broker in street name for a beneficial owner are not voted with respect to a particular proposal because the broker has not received timely voting instructions from the beneficial owner and the broker lacks discretionary voting power to vote those shares. In these cases, the broker can register your shares as being present at the meeting for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum but will not be able to vote on those matters for which specific authorization is required under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange.
Q.What is the quorum requirement for the annual meeting?
A.
To conduct business at the annual meeting, a quorum of shareholders must be present. The presence in person or by properly executed proxy of the holders of a majority of all issued and outstanding shares of Chemical Financial common stock entitled to vote at the meeting is necessary for a quorum. To determine whether a quorum is present, we will include shares that are present or represented by proxy, including abstentions and shares represented by a broker non-vote on any matter.
Q.What vote is necessary to approve the proposals?
A.
Proposal 1: Election of Directors.  A plurality of the shares voting is required to elect directors. This means that, if there are more nominees than positions to be filled, the nominees who receive the most votes
Standard. Assuming a quorum is present, directors will be elected to the open director positions. Abstentions, broker non-votes and other shares that are not voted in person or by proxy will not be included in the vote count. In the event that a nominee currently serving as a director receives a greater number of votes “withheld” from his or her election than votes “for” his or her election, such nominee must promptly tender his or her resignation to the board of directors. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee must promptly consider the resignation and recommend to the board of directors whether to accept or reject the resignation. The board of directors then must act on the committee’s recommendation and determine whether to accept or reject the resignation.
Proposal 2.  Proposal 2 will be approved if a majority of the shares entitled to vote are voted in favor of the proposal. Abstentions, broker non-votes and other shares that are not voted on Proposal 2 in person or by proxy will have the same effect as votes against this proposal.

Proposals 3, 4 and 5.    Proposals 3, 4 and 5 will be approved if a majority of the shares that are voted on each proposal at the meeting are voted in favor of each proposal. Abstentions, broker non-votes and other shares that are not voted on Proposals 3, 4 and 5 in person or by proxy will not be included in the vote count.
Proposal 6.  On Proposal 6, you may vote that an advisory vote on executive compensation should occur every one, two, or three years, or you may abstain from voting. This proposal will be determined by a plurality of the shares voting. Abstentions,votes cast. This means that the 13 nominees who receive the largest number of "FOR" votes cast will be elected as directors. In the event that a nominee currently serving as a director receives a greater number of votes "withheld" from his or her election than votes "for" his or her election, such nominee must promptly tender his or her resignation to the board of directors. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee must promptly consider the resignation and recommend to the board of directors whether to accept or reject the resignation. The board of directors then must act on the committee’s recommendation and determine whether to accept or reject the resignation. Shareholders do not have cumulative voting rights.
Effect of abstentions and broker non-votes. If you fail to vote, mark “ABSTAIN” on your proxy card, or fail to instruct your bank or broker how to vote with respect to Proposal 1, you will be deemed not to have cast a vote with respect to the proposal and other shares that are not voted in person or by proxyit will not be included inhave no effect on the vote count.proposal.

Required VoteProposal 2:Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting for Other Matters.2019.
Standard. We do not knowAssuming a quorum is present, this proposal requires the affirmative vote of any other matters to be presented at the meeting. Generally, any other proposal to be voted on at the meeting would be approved if a majority of the shares that are votedvotes cast at the meeting.



Effect of abstentions and broker non-votes. If you fail to vote, mark “ABSTAIN” on your proxy card, or fail to instruct your bank or broker how to vote with respect to Proposal 2, you will be deemed not to have cast a vote with respect to the proposal and it will have no effect on the proposal.

Proposal 3:Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers.
Standard. Assuming a quorum is present, this proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the meeting are voted in favormeeting.

Effect of abstentions and broker non-votes. If you fail to vote, mark “ABSTAIN” on your proxy card, or fail to instruct your bank or broker how to vote with respect to Proposal 3, you will be deemed not to have cast a vote with respect to the proposal and it will have no effect on the proposal.

Proposal 4:Approval of the proposal. Abstentions,Chemical Financial Corporation Stock Incentive Plan of 2019.
Standard. Assuming a quorum is present, this proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the meeting.

Effect of abstentions and broker non-votes. If you fail to vote, mark “ABSTAIN” on your proxy card, or fail to instruct your bank or broker how to vote with respect to Proposal 4, you will be deemed not to have cast a vote with respect to the proposal and other shares that are not votedit will have no effect on the proposal in person or by proxy would not be included in the vote count.proposal.

Q.May the annual meeting be adjourned?
A.
Yes. TheUnder our bylaws, the Chair of the board or, in his absence the Chief Executive Officer or other presiding officer may, in his or her discretion, adjourn or postpone a meeting of shareholders regardless of whether a quorum is present. In addition, the shareholders present at the meeting, in person or by proxy, may by a majority vote, adjourn the meeting despite the absenceregardless of whether a quorum.quorum is present. Shares represented by proxy may be voted at the discretion of the proxy holder on a proposal to adjourn the meeting.
Q.What does it mean if I receive more than one proxy or voting instruction card?Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials?
A.
It means your shares are registered differently or are in more than one account. Please provide voting instructions for all proxies and voting instruction cards you receive.of your shares.
Q.Where can I find the voting results of the annual meeting?
A.
We will announce preliminary voting results at the annual meeting and publish final results in a Current Report on Form 8-K that will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) within four business days afterof the date of the annual meeting.



Overview of Proposals
This proxy statement contains six proposals requiring shareholder action. Proposal 1 requests the election of 12 directors to the board of directors. Proposal 2 requests approval of an amendment of our Restated Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of our common stock from 100,000,000 shares to 135,000,000 shares. Proposal 3 requests approval of the Stock Incentive Plan of 2017. Proposal 4 requests the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2017. Proposal 5 requests advisory approval of our executive compensation. Proposal 6 requests an advisory vote on the frequency of the advisory approval of our executive compensation.


Proposal 1
Election of 1213 Directors
Following aEach director listed below has been nominated by our board of directors, following review and nomination from therecommendation by our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, the board of directors proposes that the following nominees be elected as directors for termsto serve a one-year term expiring at the 2018our 2020 annual meeting of shareholders:shareholders or until that person's successor is duly elected and qualified:
James R. Fitterling
Ronald A. Klein
Richard M. Lievense
Barbara J. Mahone
Barbara L. McQuade
John E. Pelizzari
David T. Provost
David B. RamakerThomas C. Shafer
Larry D. Stauffer
Jeffrey L. Tate
Gary Torgow
Arthur A. Weiss
Franklin C. Wheatlake
Each proposed nominee currently serves as a director of Chemical Financial Corporation and Chemical Bank for a term that will expire at this year’s annual meeting. Mr. Gary E. Andersonmeeting or until that person's successor is currentlyduly elected and qualified. Each nominee has agreed to serve as a director of Chemical Financial. Mr. Anderson will retire from the board of directors effective at the annual meeting on April 26, 2017 after serving over twelve years on the board of directors of Chemical Financial . The proposed nominees are willing to be elected and serve as directors.if elected. If a nominee is unable to serve or is otherwise unavailable for election, which we do not anticipate, the incumbent board of directors may or may not select a substitute nominee. If a substitute nominee is selected, your proxy will be voted for the person selected. If a substitute nominee is not selected, your proxy will be voted for the election of the remaining nominees. No proxy will be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named above.
Biographical information concerning theeach of our director nominees for director of Chemical Financial appears below under the heading “Board of Directors.” Each of the current directors and nominees for director other than David B. Ramaker,T. Provost, Thomas C. Shafer, Gary Torgow and Richard M. Lievense Gary Torgow, and David T. Provost, qualified as independent directors as defined by NASDAQ Listing Rules,listing rules, including such definitions applicable to each committee of the board of directors upon which he or she serves or served. In making this determination, the board of directors considered all ordinary course loan and other business transactions between the directors and Chemical Bank.
Your Board of Directors and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee
recommendrecommends that you vote FOR the election of all nominees as directors.


Proposal 2
Amendment of our Restated Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of
authorized shares of common stock from 100,000,000 shares to 135,000,000 shares
The board of directors proposes to amend Article IIIRatification of the Corporation’s Restated Articlesappointment of Incorporation to increaseKPMG LLP as our independent
registered public accounting firm for the number of authorized shares of our common stock from 100,000,000 shares to 135,000,000 shares. The purpose of the amendment is to provide additional shares for future issuance.
The board of directors has unanimously approved, and recommends that the Corporation’s shareholders approve, the proposed amendment to the Restated Articles of Incorporation. The board of directors determined the approval of the proposed amendment to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock would be in the best interests of the Corporation and its shareholders.
We currently have 100,000,000 shares of common stock authorized for issuance and 2,000,000 shares of preferred stock authorized for issuance. As of February 27, 2017, 71,068,446 shares of common stock of the 100,000,000 shares authorized for issuance were issued and outstanding and 2,571,337 shares were reserved for issuance under the Corporation’s share-based plans leaving us with 26,360,217 shares of common stock available for future issuance. As of February 27, 2017, no shares of preferred stock were issued and outstanding.year ending December 31, 2019

The boardAudit Committee has appointed KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm to audit our consolidated financial statements as of directors believes that it is advisable to have a sufficient amount of additional authorized shares of common stock available for future issuance for important corporate purposes and provide the ability to react quickly to strategic opportunities. Acquisitions of other organizations continues to be a key strategy for the long-term growthyear ending December 31, 2019 and the effectiveness of the Corporation. Authorized but unissued sharesinternal control over financial reporting as of common stock,December 31, 2019, and to perform such other appropriate audit-related accounting, tax compliance or funds raised in a public offering of shares,other tax services as may be used for these purposes. The additional authorized shares would also be available for possible future stock splits and dividends, equity incentive plans, equity compensation plans to attract and retain talented employees and other corporate purposes that might be considered. The Corporation has no present plans or proposals to issue the additional shares that would be authorizedapproved by the proposed amendment.

All of the additional authorized shares of common stock would be of the same class with the same dividend, voting,Audit Committee. The Audit Committee and liquidation rights as the shares of common stock presently issued and outstanding. If Proposal 2 is approved, our authorized capital stock would continue to include 2,000,000 shares of preferred stock. Shareholders have no preemptive rights to acquire shares of common stock issued by the Corporation under its Restated Articles of Incorporation and shareholders would not acquire preemptive rights with respect to the additional authorized shares of stock under the proposed amendment to the Restated Articles of Incorporation.
The issuance of additional shares of common stock could dilute the voting rights, equity and earnings per share of existing shareholders. The issuance of additional shares of common stock, or the perception that additional shares may be issued, may also adversely affect the market price of our common stock. The additional shares of common stock that would become available for issuance if the amendment is approved could also be used by us to oppose a hostile takeover attempt or to delay or prevent changes in control or management of the Corporation. For example, without further shareholder approval, the board of directors could strategically sell sharespropose and recommend that shareholders ratify the appointment of common stock in a private transaction to purchasers who would oppose a takeover or favorKPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the current board of directors. Althoughyear ending December 31, 2019.
More information concerning our relationship with KPMG LLP appears below under the amendment to increasesubheading “Board Committees–Audit Committee” and the authorized shares of common stock has been prompted by the businessheadings “Audit Committee Report” and financial considerations described above, and not by the threat of any hostile takeover attempt (nor is the board of directors currently aware of any such attempts directed at us), shareholders should be aware that approval of the amendment could facilitate future efforts by us to deter or prevent changes in control.
If the proposed amendment is adopted, the newly authorized shares would be unreserved and available for issuance. No further shareholder authorization would be required prior to the issuance of such shares by the Corporation, except where shareholder approval is required under NASDAQ rules.


“Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.”
If the shareholders approve Proposal 2, wedo not ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP, the Audit Committee will fileconsider a Certificate of Amendment to our Restated Articles of Incorporation to amend the first paragraph of Article III, in its entirety, to read as follows:
The total authorized capital stockchange of the Corporation is 137,000,000 shares of stock divided into two classes, as follows:
A.    135,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $1.00 per share; and
B.    2,000,000 shares of preferred stock, no par value.
Exceptindependent registered public accounting firm for the first paragraph, all of the remaining provisions in Article III of the Restated Articles of Incorporation would remain in full force and effect without change. The text of the proposed amendment is subject to modification to include such changes as the board of directors determines to be necessary or advisable to effect the increase in authorized shares of common stock.next year.
Your Board of Directors and the Audit Committee
recommends that you vote FOR Proposal 2.
Proposal 3
Advisory Approval of Executive Compensation

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank Act) requires, among other things, that we hold a non-binding, advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K in this proxy statement.
This proposal (sometimes referred to as a Say-on-Pay proposal) gives you, as a shareholder, the opportunity to approve or not approve our executive compensation through the following resolution:

“Resolved, that the compensation paid to our named executive officers as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables, and narrative discussion is hereby approved.”
We believe that our executive compensation programs and policies appropriately align named executive officers’ incentives with shareholder interests and are designed to attract and retain high quality executive talent. We believe that our executive compensation programs and policies are and have been competitive within the industry and in comparison with the compensation programs and policies of competitors in the markets that we serve. We also believe that both Chemical and our shareholders benefit from responsive corporate governance policies and dialogue.
This vote is advisory, which means that it is not binding on us or the board of directors, and may not be construed as overruling a decision by the board of directors or creating an additional fiduciary duty of the board of directors. However, the Compensation and Pension Committee will take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation decisions.
Our current policy is to provide shareholders with an opportunity to approve executive compensation each year at the annual meeting of shareholders. The next such vote is scheduled to occur at the 2020 annual meeting of shareholders.

Your Board of Directors and the Compensation and Pension Committee
recommends that you vote FOR Proposal 3.


Proposal 34
Approval of the Stock Incentive Plan of 2017

The Chemical Financial Corporation Stock Incentive Plan of 20152019

The purpose of the Chemical Financial Corporation Stock Incentive Plan of 2019 (the “2015“2019 Stock Plan”) was approvedis to advance our long-term interests by aligning the interests of our officers, directors and key employees with those of our shareholders atthrough equity-based awards. Our board of directors also believes that equity-based awards are necessary to attract, retain and motivate officers, directors and key employees of exceptional abilities, and to recognize the 2015 annual meeting of shareholders. significant contributions these individuals have made to our long-term performance and growth.


Under the 2015Chemical Financial Corporation Stock Incentive Plan 626,353of 2017 (the “2017 Stock Plan”), 1,301,285 shares remained available for issuance as of December 31, 2016.2018. Because there are a limited number of shares available for issuance under the 20152017 Stock Plan, theour board of directors believes that it is advisable to implement the 2019 Stock Plan, which will make additional shares available for restricted stock units (including both performance-based restricted stock performance units and time-vesting restricted stock service-based units), stock options and other equity-based awards. Rather than reload the 2015The 2019 Stock Plan, the board of directors believes it is in the best interest of the Corporation and its shareholders to establish the Chemical Financial Corporation Stock Incentive Plan of 2017 (the “2017 Stock Plan”) toif approved, will replace the 20152017 Stock Plan.
Important Considerations
The board of directors believes aPlan and no new plan is warranted for several reasons. In connection with the recent merger with Talmer Bancorp, Inc. (“Talmer”), the Corporation issued a number of equity-based awards to retain personnel following announcement of the merger. In addition, the Corporation is significantly larger in size following the Talmer merger, with many more employees. The board of directors expects that the Corporation will need more shares available for potential equity-based awards due to the significant increase in the number of employees. Moreover, as a result of the Talmer merger, the Corporation entered into a new peer group for purposes of comparing compensation plans and practices, as well as corporate performance. The board of directors expects that the Corporation’s compensation practices will change in response to the practices of the members of its new peer group, all of which are much larger in size when compared to the members of the Corporation’s previous peer group. A new plan provides additional flexibility to make awards that were not availablebe granted under the 2015 Stock Plan.
The Pension and Compensation Committee has adopted and approved, and recommended that the board of directors adopt and approve, the 2017 Stock Plan. TheHowever, any awards outstanding under the 2017 Stock Plan, and any prior plan, will continue to be outstanding and governed by the provisions of the applicable plans.
If the 2019 Stock Plan is not approved by our shareholders, it will not be adopted and we will continue to operate under the 2017 Stock Plan until it expires. In the event the 2019 Stock Plan is not approved, our flexibility may be limited with respect to our ability to provide incentives and reward employees and directors, to attract and retain such persons on a competitive basis and to align the interests of such persons with ours.
On the approval and recommendation of our Compensation and Pension Committee (the “Compensation Committee”), the board of directors has adopted and approved the 2019 Stock Plan, subject to shareholder approval, and recommends that the Corporation’s shareholders approve, the 2017 Stock Plan because itapproval. The board of directors believes that the design of the 20172019 Stock Plan and the number of shares to be authorized for issuance under the plan are consistent with the interests of shareholders and good corporate governance practices. In adopting and approving the 20172019 Stock Plan, the board of directors was mindful of investor considerations relating to the 2017 Stock Plan,plan, including the following:
Important Plan Features
The total number of shares available for issuance under the 20172019 Stock Plan will be 1,750,000.2,400,000. The 20172019 Stock Plan includes, among other things, the following notable terms:reflects current practices in equity incentive plans that we consider best practices, such as:

No Share Recycling. Recycling. Shares subject to equity-based awards that are cancelled, surrendered, modified, or exchanged for substitute equity-based awards, or that forfeit, expire or terminate prior to exercise or vesting in full and shares that are surrendered to the Corporationus in connection with the exercise or vesting of equity-based awards, whether previously owned or otherwise subject to such equity-based awards, may not be reissued as new equity-based awards under the 2017 Stock Plan.plan.

No Dividends on Unvested Equity Awards. Awards. Holders of unvested equity-based awards will not be entitled to dividend rights with respect to the shares of common stock constituting or subject to such unvested equity-based awards, provided that dividends otherwise payable with respect to such shares of common stock may, at the discretion of the Pension and Compensation Committee, accrue and become payable upon vesting of the equity-based awards.

Minimum Vesting Period of One Year. Year. At least 95% of all equity-based awards granted under the 2017 Stock Planplan must have a minimum vesting period of at least one year.

No Repricing. Repricing. Equity-based awards may not be repriced, replaced, regranted through cancellation, or modified without shareholder approval if such repricing, replacement, regrant or modification would reduce the exercise price of such equity-based awards.

Double-Trigger Acceleration of Vesting of Equity Awards Uponon a Change in Control. UponUnder the plan, unless otherwise stated in any award agreement or separate agreement with the participant, on a change in control of the Corporation,Chemical, the vesting of unvested equity awards would only accelerate only uponon a qualifying termination of employment and, inemployment.

Clawback Policy Implementation. All awards under the case of performance-based equity awards, wouldplan will be subject to pro rata vesting, adjustedany applicable law respecting recapture of compensation and Chemical’s clawback policy for actual performance and the fractional performance period. In addition, absent any qualifying terminationrecoupment of employment, unvested equity awards (including those that are cashed out in connection with the change in control) would remain subjectincentive compensation, as it may be amended from time to their original vesting schedules.time.


Independent Oversight. The plan will be administered by our Compensation Committee, which is a committee of independent board members.

Grant Practices

Burn rate, which is a measure of share utilization rate in equity compensation plans, is an important factor for investors concerned about shareholder dilution. Burn rate is defined as the gross number of equity-based awards granted during a calendar year divided by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the year. The Corporation hasWe have counted full-value awards, which do not include stock options, as 3.0 shares of common stock when calculating the burn rate. TheOur board of directors believes that the Corporation’sour current three-year average burn rate for the period ended December 31, 20162018 of 1.64%1.44% compares favorably to the Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) recommended burn rate benchmark of 2.98%2.81% for Russell 3000 (excluding S&P 500)


banking institutions for meetings occurring on or after February 1, 2017,2019, as set forth in the Appendix D to the ISS report titled “Setting the Bar for Equity-Based Compensation” published“U.S. Equity Compensation Plans Frequently Asked Questions” updated December 21, 2016.19, 2018.
Equity Award Vehicle201620172018
A. Time-vesting RSUs - Granted107,665100,120203,482
B. Performance-based RSUs - Granted (at target)58,21169,132117,561
C. Performance-based RSUs - Vested63,91758,08661,852
D. Restricted and Common Stock - Granted11,97873,8260
E. Stock Options - Granted441,167132,4140
F. Total (A + C + D + E)(1)
991,847828,510796,002
(1) Incorporates full value share multiplier of 3.0   
    
G. Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding (Basic) (in thousands)48,95270,86571,338
    
H. Adjusted 1-Year Burn Rate (F / G)2.03%1.17%1.12%
    
I. Adjusted 3-Year Burn Rate (Average of 2016-2018)  1.44%

TheOur board of directors does not anticipate a significant increase in the Corporation’sour average burn rate and estimates that the additional 1,750,0002,400,000 shares to be authorized for issuance under the 20172019 Stock Plan will be sufficient for threefour to four years.five years as a stand-alone company. However, assuming completion of our recently announced merger with TCF Financial Corporation, which we expect to close in the third or early fourth quarter of 2019 (subject to required shareholder and regulatory approvals), we expect the increase in our size and number of employees to cause the shares to be authorized for issuance under the 2019 Stock Plan to be sufficient for a substantially shorter period of time.
The performance-based restricted stock performance units granted in 2014, 2015,2016, 2017, 2018 and 20162019 are earned from 0.5x0% to 1.5x150% of the number of units originally granted depending on satisfaction of the established performance conditions, and vest upon satisfaction of the service requirement at the end of the restricted period. RestrictedTime-vesting restricted stock service-based units granted in 20142016 and 20152017 generally cliff vest five years after the grant date. TheTime-vesting restricted stock units granted in 2018 and 2019 generally vest in equal annual installments on each anniversary of the grant date over a five year period. Stock options granted in 2014, 2015,2016 and 20162017 vest in one-fifth incrementsequal installments on each anniversary date of the awardgrant date over the firsta five years of the option term. Restricted stock service-based units granted in 2016 cliff vest between two and five years after the grant date.year period.
60% of the equity-based compensation awarded to the Corporation’sour Chief Executive Officer in 20162018 consisted of performance-based restricted stock units with a three-year performance units, while 30%period and 40% consisted of stock options and 10% consisted oftime-vesting restricted stock service-based units.units, which vest in equal annual installments on each anniversary of the grant date over a five year period.
Equity-based awards under the 2017 Stock Plan would be subject to the Corporation’s clawback policy.

Overhang
Overhang is a commonly used measure to assess the dilutive impact of equity programs such as the 20172019 Stock Plan. Overhang shows how much existing shareholder ownership would be diluted if all outstanding equity-based awards plus all remaining shares available for equity-based awards were introduced into the market. Overhang is equal to the number of equity-award shares currently outstanding plus the number of equity-award shares available to be granted, divided by the total diluted shares of common stock outstanding at the end of the year. TheOur board of directors believes that an overhang of less than 15% is generally considered by investors to not raise questions of excessive dilution. The 1,750,0002,400,000 shares subject to the 20172019 Stock Plan would bring the Corporation’sour aggregate overhang to 7.2%5.80%. The table below provides updated overhang data as of March 12, 2019:
Outstanding Equity Awards# of Shares
A. Time-vesting Restricted Stock Units536,081
B. Performance-based Restricted Stock Units298,911
C. Stock Options(1)
680,890
D. Total (A + B + C)1,515,882
(1) Weighted average exercise price of $31.59 and weighted average remaining term of 5.58 years.
Shares Available for Grant# of Shares
E. 2017 Stock Plan (if 2019 Stock Plan approved)0
F. Directors' Deferred Stock Plan232,500
G. 2019 Stock Plan (if approved)2,400,000
H. Total (E + F + G)2,632,500
I. Total Shares Outstanding + Shares Available for Grant (D + H)4,148,382
J. Common Share Outstanding as of Record Date (3/12/2019)71,538,472
K. Overhang (I / J)5.80%

Purposes of 20172019 Stock Plan
TheOur board of directors believes that theour long-term interests of the Corporation are advanced by aligning the interests of its corporate and subsidiaryour officers, directors and key employees with the intereststhose of itsour shareholders through the award of equity-based awards. TheOur board of directors also believes that the award of equity-based awards isare necessary to attract, retain and motivate officers, directors and key employees of exceptional abilities, and to recognize the significant contributions these individuals have made to theour long-term performance and growth of the Corporation and its subsidiaries.growth.
We intend to use the 20172019 Stock Plan to grant equity-based awards that are predominantly performance-based restricted stock performance units and stock options. Other forms of long-term incentive compensation that we intend to award under the 2017 Stock Plan include stock options andtime-vesting restricted stock service-based units. Restricted stock, stock options, stock awards and other awards based on or related to shares of Chemical Financialour common stock may also be awarded under the 20172019 Stock Plan. By combining in a single plan many types of incentives commonly used in long-term incentive compensation programs, the 20172019 Stock Plan is intended to provide the Corporationus with a great deal of flexibility in designing specific long-term incentives to best promote the objectives of the 20172019 Stock Plan and in turn promote the interests of our shareholders.



If the 20172019 Stock Plan is approved by the shareholders, then equity-based awards could be granted to eligible participants under the 20172019 Stock Plan and no additional awards will be made under the 20152017 Stock Plan. The 20172019 Stock Plan is intended to supplement and continue the equity-based compensation policies and practices that we have used for many years. TheOur board of directors adopted and approved the 20172019 Stock Plan on February 20, 2017.March 19, 2019. If the shareholders approve the 20172019 Stock Plan on April 26, 2017,May 7, 2019, it will become effective on that date. Equity-based awards would be granted under the 20172019 Stock Plan to participants for no cash consideration or for such minimum consideration as determined by the Compensation and Pension Committee. If the 2019 Stock Plan is approved, no equity-based awards would be granted under the plan on a date that is more than ten years after the plan’s effective date. The 20172019 Stock Plan would not be qualified under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code and would not be subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). If the 20172019 Stock Plan is not approved by the shareholders, then no equity-based awards will be effectivegranted under the 20172019 Stock Plan for any employee. No equity-based awards would be granted under the 2017 Stock Plan on a date that is more than ten years after the 2017 Stock Plan’s effective date.employee or director


The following is a summary of the material features of the 20172019 Stock Plan; however, it is not complete and, therefore, you should not rely solely on it for a detailed description of every aspect of the 20172019 Stock Plan. The summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the terms of the 20172019 Stock Plan, a copy of which is attached as Appendix A to this proxy statement.Proxy Statement. Included in the summary is information regarding the effect of U.S. federal tax laws upon participants and the Corporation.us. This information is not a complete summary of such tax laws and does not discuss the income tax laws of any state in which a participant may reside, and is subject to change. Participants in the 20172019 Stock Plan should consult their own tax advisors regarding the specific tax consequences to them of participating in and receiving equity-based awards under the 20172019 Stock Plan.
Authorized Shares
Subject to certain anti-dilution and other adjustments, 1,750,0002,400,000 shares of Chemical Financialour common stock, $1.00 par value per share, would be available for equity-based awards under the 20172019 Stock Plan, provided that not more than 60% of such shares may be issued under awards other than stock options.Plan. Shares of common stock authorized under the 20172019 Stock Plan could be either authorized but unissued shares, shares issued and repurchased by the Corporationus (including shares purchased on the open market) or shares issued and otherwise reacquired by the Corporation.us. Shares subject to equity-based awards that are canceled, surrendered, modified, or exchanged for substitute equity-based awards, or that forfeit, expire or terminate prior to exercise or vesting in full, and shares that are surrendered to the Corporationus in connection with the exercise or vesting of equity-based awards, whether previously owned or otherwise subject to such equity-based awards, may not be reissued as new equity-based awards under the 20172019 Stock Plan. The 20172019 Stock Plan would not allow any participant to receive, in any calendar year, equity-based awards issued under the 20172019 Stock Plan with respect to more than 25% of the total number of shares available under the 20172019 Stock Plan. Upon certain changes in the number of shares of Chemical Financialour common stock outstanding (e.g., stock split, recapitalization) or the occurrence of certain corporate events (e.g., merger, stock dividend), the Compensation and Pension Committee could adjust the outstanding equity-based awards and the number of shares available for equity-based awards appropriately. If the shareholders approve the 20172019 Stock Plan, unless the 20172019 Stock Plan is terminated earlier by theour board of directors, equity-based awards could be granted at any time before April 26, 2027,May 7, 2029, when the 20172019 Stock Plan will terminate according to its terms.
Eligible Participants
OfficersApproximately 200 officers and key employees of the CorporationChemical and itsour subsidiaries couldmay receive equity-based awards under the 20172019 Stock Plan. Additionally,Officers, directors, of the Corporation and its subsidiaries may receive awards of restricted stock under the Plan exclusively in lieu of payment of the cash portion of the directors’ compensation. Officers, key employees of Chemical and directors of the Corporation and itsour subsidiaries may be considered to have an interest in the 20172019 Stock Plan because they may in the future receive equity-based awards under it.

New Plan Benefits

No equity-based awards have been granted or received under the 20172019 Stock Plan through the date of this proxy statement.Proxy Statement. Because benefits under the 20172019 Stock Plan will depend on the Compensation and Pension Committee’s actions and the fair market value of Chemical Financialour common stock at various future dates, the benefits payable under the 20172019 Stock Plan and the benefits that would have been payable had the 20172019 Stock Plan been in effect during the most recent fiscal year are not determinable.
Administration of the 20172019 Stock Plan
The 20172019 Stock Plan would be administered by the Compensation and Pension Committee. The committeeCompensation Committee would be authorized and empowered to do all things that it determined to be necessary or appropriate in connection with the administration of the 20172019 Stock Plan. The committeeCompensation Committee would determine, subject to the terms of the 20172019 Stock Plan, the persons to receive equity-based awards, the nature and amount of equity-based awards to be granted to each person (subject to the limits specified in the 20172019 Stock Plan), the time of each grant, the terms and duration of each grant, and all other determinations necessary or advisable for administration of the 20172019 Stock Plan.


Performance-Based Restricted Stock Performance Units, Time-Vesting Restricted Stock Service-Based Units, and Restricted Stock
The 20172019 Stock Plan would also permit the Compensation and Pension Committee to award restricted stock units (including both performance-based restricted stock performance units and time-vesting restricted stock service-based units) and restricted stock, subject to the terms and conditions set by the committeeCompensation Committee that are consistent with the 20172019 Stock Plan. Restricted stock units are equity-based awards denominated in units of our common stock under which the issuance of shares of our common stock is subject to such terms and conditions as the Compensation and Pension Committee deems appropriate (including achievement of performance goals established by the committee and/or continued employment)employment or service as a director). For purposes of determining the number of shares available under the 20172019 Stock Plan, each restricted stock unit would count as the maximum number of shares of our common stock subject to the restricted stock unit. Unless determined otherwise by the Compensation and Pension Committee, each earned restricted stock unit would be equal to one share of Chemical Financialour common stock and would entitle a participant to either shares of our common stock or an amount of cash determined with reference to the value of shares of our common stock.


Shares of restricted stock are shares of our common stock, the retention, vesting and/or transferability of which is subject, for specified periods of time, to such terms and conditions as the Compensation and Pension Committee deems appropriate (including achievement of performance goals established by the committee and/or continued employment)employment or service as a director).
The Compensation and Pension Committee would establish the terms of individual awards of restricted stock units and restricted stock in award agreements. Restricted stock units and restricted stock granted to a participant would “vest” (i.e., the restrictions on them would lapse) in the manner and at the times that the Compensation and Pension Committee determines. The Compensation and Pension Committee would be permitted to vary the terms, conditions and restrictions among participants and among grants to the same participant.
Unless the Compensation and Pension Committee otherwise consents or permits or unlessparticipant, including the terms ofand conditions described below.
If a restricted stock agreementdirector’s service ceases or award provide otherwise, if a participant’s employment is terminated during the restricted period (i.e., the period of time during which restricted stock units or restricted stock are subject to vesting or performance restrictions) for any reason other than death, disability, termination without cause or retirement, each unvested restricted stock unit and restricted stock award of the participant would automatically be forfeited and, in the case of restricted stock, returned to the Corporation. us.
If thea director’s service ceases or a participant’s employment is terminated during the restricted period because of death, disability or termination without cause, then, unless otherwise specified in an applicable award agreement or controlling agreement with respect to the unvested restricted stock units andparticipant, the restrictions remaining on any or all shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units would lapse and would vest automatically with respecton a prorated basis and be convertible into a number of shares of our common stock equal to (a) the number of suchthe participant’s unvested restricted stock or restricted stock units or sharesas of restricted stock (rounded to the nearest whole number) equal toeffective date of the total number of such restricted stock units or shares of restricted stock granted to such participanttermination, multiplied by (b) the quotient of (x) the number of full months that have elapsed since the later of the date of grant divided byor the most recent annual vesting date and the effective date of participant’s termination or cessation of service and (y) the total number of full months remaining in the vesting period since the later of the date of grant or the most recent annual vesting date. We currently anticipate that award agreements for our executives will provide for full vesting upon a termination of employment or cessation of service because of death, disability or termination without cause. For restricted period (providedstock or restricted stock units that any performance-basedare subject to attainment of performance goals, the number of the participant’s unvested restricted stock or restricted stock units that are subject to proration, or full vesting requirements must(if applicable), as of the effective date of his or her termination shall be satisfied before the shares may be issued).target (100%) number of restricted stock or restricted stock units set forth in the applicable equity-based award agreement. All of the unvested restricted stock units and shares of restricted stock would be forfeited and, in the case of restricted stock, returned to the Corporation;us; however, the Compensation and Pension Committee could, either before or after a participant dies or becomes disabled, waive the vesting or performance restrictions remaining on any or all of his or her remaining restricted stock units and shares of restricted stock.
If a participant who is a director ceases providing services as a director due to retirement during the restricted period, then the restrictions remaining on any or all shares of restricted stock shall terminate automatically in full upon retirement. If a participant’s employment is terminated during the restricted period due to the participant’s retirement and the participant fails to provide at least one year’s notice of retirement to the Corporation,us, each unvested restricted stock unit and share of restricted stock of the participant would automatically be forfeited and, in the case of restricted stock, returned to the Corporation.us. If the participant’s employment is terminated during the restricted period due to the participant’s retirement upon not less than one year’s notice of retirement to us, then the Corporation, then unvested restricted stock service-based units andrestrictions remaining on any or all shares of restricted stock subject solely to service-based vesting requirements would automatically vest in full, and unvested restricted stock performance units and restricted stock subject to performance-based vesting requirementsunits would lapse and would vest automatically with respect to thaton a prorated basis, or fully vest (if applicable), and be convertible into a number of restricted stock performance units and shares of restrictedour common stock subject to performance-based vesting requirements (in each case roundedin the manner applicable to the nearest whole number) equal to the respective total numbertermination of such restricted stock performance units and sharesemployment because of restricted stock granted to such participant multiplied by the number of full months that have elapsed since the date of grant divided by the total number of full months in the respective restricted period (provided that the performance-based vesting requirements must be satisfied before the shares may be issued).death, disability, or termination without cause. All of the remaining performance-based restricted stock performance units and shares of restricted stock would be forfeited and, in the case of restricted stock, returned to the Corporation;us; however, the Compensation and Pension Committee could, either before or after a participant retires, waive the vesting or performance restrictions remaining on any or all of his or her remaining restricted stock performance units or shares of restricted stock.


Without Compensation and Pension Committee authorization, until restricted stock units or shares of restricted stock vest, the recipient of the restricted stock units or restricted stock would not be allowed to sell, exchange, transfer, pledge, assign or otherwise dispose of restricted stock units or restricted stock other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution. All rights with respect to restricted stock units and restricted stock would only be exercisable during a participant’s lifetime by the participant or his or her guardian or legal representative. The Compensation and Pension Committee could impose additional restrictions on restricted stock units and shares of restricted stock. Except for restrictions on transferability, holders of restricted stock would enjoy all other rights of a shareholder with respect to the restricted stock, including liquidation and voting rights, subject to the restrictions on payment of dividends as set forth below. Unless the Compensation and Pension Committee determines otherwise, holders of restricted stock units are not entitled to liquidation or voting rights with respect to shares of common stock subject to unvested restricted stock units.
Federal Tax Consequences of Restricted Stock, Performance-Based Restricted Stock Performance Units and Time-Vesting Restricted Stock Service-Based Units
Generally, under current federal income tax laws, a participant would not recognize income upon the award of restricted stock, performance-based restricted stock performance units or time-vesting restricted stock service-based units. However, a participant would be required to recognize compensation income at the time the award vests (when the restrictions lapse) equal to the difference between the fair market value of the stock at vesting and the amount paid for the stock (if any). At the time the participant recognizes compensation income, the Corporationwe would be entitled to a corresponding deduction for federal income tax purposes, except to the extent that the deduction limits of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code apply. If restricted stock, performance-based restricted stock performance units or time-vesting restricted stock service-based units are forfeited by a participant, the participant would not recognize income with respect to the forfeited award and the Corporationwe would not receive a corresponding deduction for federal income tax purposes.
A participant could, within 30 days after the date of an award of restricted stock (but not an award of restricted stock units), elect to report compensation income for the tax year in which the restricted stock is awarded. If the participant makes this election, the amount of compensation income would be equal to the difference between the fair market value of the restricted stock at the time


of the award and the amount paid for the stock (if any). Any later appreciation in the value of the restricted stock would be treated as capital gain and recognized only upon the sale of the shares subject to the award of restricted stock. If, however, restricted stock is forfeited after the participant makes such an election, the participant would not be allowed any deduction for the amount that he or she earlier reported as income. Upon the sale of shares subject to the restricted stock award, a participant would recognize capital gain or loss in the amount of the difference between the sale price and the participant’s basis in the stock.
Stock Options
The 20172019 Stock Plan would permit the Corporationus to grant to participants options to purchase shares of Chemical Financialour common stock at stated prices for specific periods of time. For purposes of determining the number of shares available under the 20172019 Stock Plan, each stock option would count as the number of shares of common stock subject to the stock option. Stock options that could be granted under the 20172019 Stock Plan may only be nonqualified stock options and may not qualify as incentive stock options as defined in Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code.
The Compensation and Pension Committee would establish the terms of individual stock option grants in stock option agreements. These documents would contain terms, conditions and restrictions that the committee determines to be appropriate. These restrictions could include vesting requirements to encourage long-term ownership of shares. The Compensation and Pension Committee would be permitted to vary the terms, conditions and restrictions among participants and among grants to the same participant.
The exercise price of a stock option would be determined by the Compensation and Pension Committee, but must be at least 100% of the market value of Chemical Financialour common stock on the date of grant. No stock option could be repriced, replaced, regranted through cancellation or modified without shareholder approval if the effect of such repricing, replacement, regrant or modification would be to reduce the exercise price of such stock options to the same participants.
When exercising all or a portion of a stock option, a participant couldmay pay the exercise price with cash or, if permitted by the Compensation and Pension Committee, shares of Chemical Financialour common stock. The committeeCompensation Committee could also authorize payment of all or a portion of the exercise price in the form of a promissory note or installment payments, except as limited by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 or other laws, rules or regulations. Any promissory note or installment payments must be with full recourse and at the market rate of interest. TheOur board of directors couldmay restrict or suspend the power of the committeeCompensation Committee to permit such loans, however, and could require that adequate security be provided. In addition, the Compensation and Pension Committee may allowallows broker-assisted cashless exercises of stock options.


Although the term of each stock option would be determined by the Compensation and Pension Committee, no stock option would be exercisable under the 20172019 Stock Plan more than ten10 years and one day after the date it was granted. Stock options generally would be exercisable for limited periods of time if an option holder dies, becomes disabled, retires, is terminated without cause, or voluntarily leaves his or her employment or service to the extent that such options were exercisable on the date of the option holder’s death, disability, or termination of employment. If an option holder is terminated for cause, the option holder would forfeit all rights to exercise any outstanding stock options. Subject to the other terms of the 2017 Stock Plan, if an option holder retires (as specified in the 2017 Stock Plan) as an employee, he or she could exercise options in accordance with their terms following retirement, unless the terms of the option agreement or award provide otherwise.
Restrictions on Transfer
Without Compensation and Pension Committee approval, stock optionsconsent or permission, a participant cannot sell, exchange, transfer, pledge, assign or otherwise dispose of an equity-based award granted under the 20172019 Stock Plan generally could not be transferred, exceptother than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, unless transfer is permitteddistribution. All rights with respect to equity-based awards would only be exercisable during a participant’s lifetime by the terms of the grantparticipant or the applicable stock option agreement.his or her guardian or legal representative. The committeeCompensation Committee could impose otheradditional restrictions on shares of common stock acquired through a stock option exercise.equity-based awards.
Federal Tax Consequences of Stock Options
The 20172019 Stock Plan only provides for awards of nonqualified stock options – those options that do not meet the Internal Revenue Code’s definition of an incentive stock option. Under current federal income tax laws, an option holder would not recognize any income and the Corporationwe would not receive a deduction for federal income tax purposes when a nonqualified stock option is granted or vests. If a nonqualified stock option is exercised, the option holder would recognize compensation income equal to the difference between the exercise price paid and the market value of the stock acquired upon exercise (on the date of exercise). The CorporationWe would then receive a corresponding deduction for federal income tax purposes, except to the extent that the deduction limits of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code apply. The option holder’s tax basis in the shares acquired would be the exercise price paid plus the amount of compensation income recognized. Sale of the stock after exercise would result in recognition of short-term or long-term capital gain (or loss).
Other Stock-Based Awards
The 20172019 Stock Plan would also permit the Compensation and Pension Committee to grant a participant one or more types of awards in the form of Chemical Financialour common stock or based on, or related to, shares of Chemical Financialour common stock, other than the types described above. The committee


Compensation Committee could make stock awards for any amount of consideration, or no consideration, as the committeeCompensation Committee determines. Any such awards would be subject to terms and conditions as the Compensation and Pension Committee deems appropriate, as set forth in the respective award agreements and as permitted under the 20172019 Stock Plan. Stock award recipients would generally have all voting, liquidation and other rights with respect to awarded shares of Chemical Financialour common stock upon becoming the holder of record of the common stock granted pursuant to the award, subject to the restrictions regarding payment of dividends as set forth below. However, the committeeCompensation Committee could impose restrictions on the assignment or transfer of common stock awarded under the 20172019 Stock Plan.
Federal Tax Consequences of Other Stock-Based Awards
The recipient of a stock award generally would recognize compensation income equal to the difference between the fair market value of the stock when it is awarded and the amount paid for the stock (if any). The recipient’s tax basis in the stock would equal the amount of compensation income recognized on the award plus the amount paid by the recipient for the stock (if any). The CorporationWe would be entitled to a corresponding deduction for federal income tax purposes equal to the amount of compensation income recognized by the recipient, except to the extent that the deduction limits of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code apply. Upon a subsequent sale of the stock, the recipient would recognize capital gain or loss equal to the difference between the amount realized on the sale and his or her basis in the stock. Different rules may apply where the stock is transferred subject to a “substantial risk of forfeiture.”
Dividends
Holders of unvested equity-based awards will not be entitled to dividend rights with respect to the shares of our common stock constituting or subject to such unvested equity-based awards; provided, however, that dividends otherwise payable with respect to such shares of our common stock may, at the discretion of the Pension and Compensation Committee, accrue and become payable upon vesting of the equity-based awards.


Effects of a Change in Control of Chemical Financial
UponUnless otherwise stated in any award agreement or separate agreement with the participant under the 2019 Stock Plan, upon the occurrence of a change in control of the CorporationChemical (as defined in the 20172019 Stock Plan), the vesting of unvested equity awards would accelerate only upon a qualifying termination of employment and, in the case of performance-based equity awards, would be subject to pro rata vesting adjusted forat the greater of (a) target performance and (b) actual performance, andmeasured through the fractional performancelatest practicable date before the effective date of the change in control, subject to forfeiture based on the participant’s continued service through the restricted period. In addition, absent any qualifying termination of employment, unvested equity awards (including those that are cashed out in connection with the change in control) would remain subject to their original vesting schedules.
Tax Withholding
If equity-based awards are made under the 20172019 Stock Plan, the Corporationwe could withhold from any cash otherwise payable to a participant or require a participant to remit to the Corporationus amounts necessary to satisfy applicable withholding and employment-related taxes. Unless the Compensation and Pension Committee determines otherwise, tax withholding obligations could also be satisfied by withholding Chemical Financialour common stock to be received upon exercise or vesting of an equity-based award or by delivering to the Corporationus previously owned shares of our common stock. The CorporationWe may reasonably delay the issuance or delivery of shares of Chemical Financialour common stock pursuant to an equity-based award as it determines appropriate to address tax withholding and other administrative matters.
Termination and Amendment of the 20172019 Stock Plan or Awards
TheOur board of directors could terminate the 20172019 Stock Plan at any time and could from time to time amend the 20172019 Stock Plan, as it considers proper and in theour best interests, of the Corporation, provided that no such amendment could be made (except adjustments expressly permitted by the 20172019 Stock Plan) without the approval of our shareholders of the Corporation if itsuch amendment would (i) reduce the exercise price of a stock option below the market value of the underlying stock on the date of the grant, (ii) reduce the exercise price of outstanding stock options, (iii) increase the individual annual maximum award limit, or (iv) otherwise amend the 20172019 Stock Plan in any manner requiring shareholder approval by law or under NASDAQ listing requirements or rules. In addition, no amendment to the 20172019 Stock Plan or to a previously granted equity-based award could impair the rights of a holder of any outstanding equity-based award without the consent of the participant, except in certain circumstances in which such amendment is necessary to satisfy a law or regulation or to meet the requirements of or avoid adverse tax or financial accounting consequences under any tax or accounting standard, law or regulation.
Subject to certain limitations, the Compensation and Pension Committee could amend or modify the terms of any outstanding equity-based award in any manner not prohibited by the 20172019 Stock Plan. However, equity-based awards issued under the 20172019 Stock Plan could not be repriced, replaced, regranted through cancellation or modified without shareholder approval if the effect would be


to reduce the exercise price of such equity-based awards to the same participants. The CorporationWe could also suspend a participant’s rights under the 20172019 Stock Plan for a period of up to sixty60 days while a participant’s termination for cause is considered.
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue CodePerformance-based Awards
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, limits to $1,000,000 the annual income tax deduction that a publicly-held corporation may claim for compensation paid to its chief executive officer and to its four most highly compensated officers other than the chief executive officer. Qualified “performance-based” compensation is exempt from the $1,000,000 limit and may be deducted even if other compensation exceeds $1,000,000. The 20172019 Stock Plan is intended to provide for the ability to grant equity-based awards that qualify asare performance-based compensation. Performance-based compensation under Section 162(m), to permit compensation associated with such awards under the 2017 Stock Plan to be tax deductible to the Corporation while allowing, as nearly as practicable, the continuation of the Corporation’s pre-existing practices with respect to the award of equity compensation. The 2017 Stock Plan will be interpreted, administered and amended if necessary to achieve that intended purpose.
Stock options awarded under the 2017 Stock Plan would automatically qualify as performance-based compensation.
For a restricted stock, restricted stock unit or other stock-based or stock-related award to qualify as performance-based compensation,means the vesting or payment of such equity-based award must be contingent upon the achievement of one or more performance goals established by the Compensation and Pension Committee and must otherwise satisfy the requirements of Section 162(m).Committee. The performance goals for equity-based awards must meet certain other criteria as well to qualify as performance-based compensation, including (i) the performance goals must be established in writing by the Compensation and Pension Committee during the first 90 days of the applicable performance period and before 25% of the performance period has elapsed, (ii) the satisfaction of the performance goals must be substantially uncertain when established by the committee for the performance period, and (iii) the performance goals must be based solely upon objective criteria from which an independent third party with knowledge of the facts could determine whether the performance goal or set of goals is satisfied and from that determination could calculate the performance-based compensation to be paid.


Under the 20172019 Stock Plan, the performance goals that may be established by the Compensation and Pension Committee, with respect to performance-based compensation, would be limited toinclude, without limitation, any one or more of the following measurements of performance, either individually or in any combination, applied to either the CorporationChemical as a whole or to a subsidiaryone of the Corporation,our subsidiaries, either individually or in any combination, and measured against pre-determined levels, the performance of a pre-established peer group or a published or special index: net income; net income per share; return on equity; cash earnings; cash earnings per share, reflecting dilution of the common stock as the committee deems appropriate and, if the committee so determines, net of or including dividends; cash earnings return on equity; operating income; operating income per share; operating income return on equity; return on assets; cash flow; cash flow return on capital; return on capital; productivity ratios; share price (including, without limitation, growth measures or total shareholder return); expense or cost levels; margins; operating efficiency; efficiency ratio; customer satisfaction, satisfaction based on specified objective goals or a Corporation-sponsoredChemical-sponsored customer survey; economic value added measurements; market share or market penetration with respect to specific designated products or services, product or service groups and/or specific geographic areas; reduction of losses, loss ratios, expense ratios or fixed costs; employee turnover; specified objective social goals; noninterest income; interest income; net interest income; deposit growth; and loan growth.
An equity-based award intended to qualify asbe performance-based compensation could provide that any evaluation of performance could include or exclude certain specific events or their effects that occur during the performance period, including asset write-downs; litigation or claim judgments or settlements; changes in tax laws, accounting principles, or other laws or provisions affecting reported results; any reorganization and restructuring programs; extraordinary nonrecurring items as described in Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 225-20 and/or in management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations appearing in the Corporation’sour annual report to shareholders for the applicable year; acquisitions, mergers or divestitures (including nonrecurring transaction-related expenses); securities offerings; accounting changes; amortization of goodwill or other intangible assets; discontinued operations; and other special charges or extraordinary items.
No participant in the 20172019 Stock Plan may be granted, in any calendar year, awards representing more than 25% of the total number of shares of Chemical Financialour common stock available for awards under the 20172019 Stock Plan. Performance-based compensation would be paid only after written certification by the Compensation and Pension Committee that the applicable performance goals have been satisfied.
Clawback
Equity-based awards under the 20172019 Plan would be subject to Chemical Financial’sour clawback policy. For more information, see “Elements of Compensation-Clawback Policy” below.
Registration of Shares
The Corporation intendsWe intend to register shares covered by the 20172019 Stock Plan under the Securities Act of 1933 before any performance-based restricted stock performance units, time-vesting restricted stock service-based units, restricted stock, stock awards or other stock-based or stock-related awards are granted and before any stock options could be exercised.

Required Vote
The 2019 Stock Plan will be approved if a majority of the shares that are voted on this proposal at the meeting are voted in favor of the proposal. Abstentions, broker non-votes and other shares that are not voted on this proposal in person or by proxy will not be included in the vote count.
Your Board of Directors and Compensation Committee
recommends that you vote FOR Proposal 3.



Proposal 4
Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent
registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2017

The Audit Committee has appointed KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm to audit the consolidated financial statements of the Corporation and its subsidiaries as of and for the year ending December 31, 2017 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, and to perform such other appropriate audit-related accounting, tax compliance or other tax services as may be approved by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee and the board of directors propose and recommend that shareholders ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2017.
More information concerning the relationship of the Company with its independent registered public accounting firm appears below under the subheading “Board Committees – Audit Committee” and the headings “Audit Committee Report” and “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.”
If the shareholders do not ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP, the Audit Committee will consider a change of the independent registered public accounting firm for the next year.
Your Board of Directors and Audit Committee
recommend that you vote FOR Proposal 4.
Proposal 5
Advisory Approval of Executive Compensation

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank Act) requires, among other things, that the Corporation permit a non-binding, advisory vote to approve the compensation of its named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K in this proxy statement.
This proposal (sometimes referred to as a Say-on-Pay proposal) gives you, as a shareholder, the opportunity to approve or not approve executive compensation through the following resolution:

“Resolved, that the compensation paid to the Corporation’s named executive officers as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables, and narrative discussion is hereby approved.”
The Corporation believes that our executive compensation programs and policies appropriately align named executive officers’ incentives with shareholder interests and are designed to attract and retain high quality executive talent. We believe that our executive compensation programs and policies are and have been competitive within the industry and in comparison with the compensation programs and policies of competitors in the markets that we serve. We also believe that both the Corporation and shareholders benefit from responsive corporate governance policies and dialogue.
The vote is advisory and not binding upon the Corporation and its board of directors, and may not be construed as overruling a decision by the board of directors or creating an additional fiduciary duty of the board of directors. However, the Compensation and Pension Committee will take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation decisions.
The Corporation’s current policy is to provide shareholders with an opportunity to approve executive compensation each year at the annual meeting of shareholders. The next such vote is scheduled to occur at the 2018 annual meeting of shareholders.

Your Board of Directors and Compensation and Pension Committee
recommend that you vote FOR Proposal 5.


Proposal 6
Advisory vote on the frequency of the advisory approval of executive compensation

The Dodd-Frank Act requires the Corporation to obtain, at least once every six years, a shareholder vote on the frequency of a shareholder advisory approval of executive compensation.
This proposal gives the Corporation’s shareholders the opportunity to vote on whether the frequency of a shareholder advisory approval of executive compensation will occur every one, two or three years. Shareholders may also abstain from casting a vote on this proposal.
The vote is advisory and not binding upon the Corporation and its board of directors, and may not be construed as overruling a decision by the board of directors or creating an additional fiduciary duty of the board of directors. However, the Compensation and Pension Committee will take into account the outcome of the vote when considering the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation.
Our shareholders voted on a similar proposal in 2011, with the majority voting for the shareholder advisory approval of executive compensation vote to occur each year. The board of directors believes that having an advisory approval of executive compensation each year is the appropriate approach because an annual advisory vote allows shareholders to provide ongoing, consistent and timely input regarding the Corporation’s executive compensation programs and policies.

Your Board of Directors and Compensation and Pension Committee
recommend that you vote ONE YEAR on Proposal 6.




Board of Directors
General
Our bylaws provide for a board of directors consisting of not fewer than five nor more than 25 individuals with the exact number to be fixed by the board of directors. The board of directors presently consists of thirteen individuals. Mr. Anderson will retire fromhas fixed the boardnumber of directors effectiveconstituting the entire board at 13.

If elected, all nominees shall serve for a term commencing on the date of the annual meeting on April 26, 2017. The term of office for each ofand continuing until the directors is one year and expires at the2020 annual meeting of shareholders or until each year.person's successor is duly elected and qualified. Each director is currently a director of Chemical and Chemical Bank.
Chemical Financial’s
Nominees for Election as Directors
Except as otherwise indicated, each director and nominee has had the same principal occupation and employment during the past five years. The age of each director and nominee is as of December 31, 2016.2018.
James R. Fitterling, age 55,57, has served as a director of Chemical Financialthe Corporation since July 2010 and is ChairmanChair of the CompensationCorporate Governance and PensionNominating Committee and a member of the Audit, Corporate GovernanceCompensation and NominatingPension, Risk Management and Risk ManagementStrategic Initiatives Committees. Mr. Fitterling served as a director of Chemical Bank from July 2010 until April 2015. Mr. Fitterling is President and Chief OperatingExecutive Officer of The Dow Chemical Company (Dow).and Chief Operating Officer of the Materials Science Division of DowDuPont. Dow is a diversified science and technology company that manufactures chemical, plastic and agricultural products. Mr. Fitterling joined Dow in 1984. After serving in a variety of sales, marketing and supply chain positions in Liquid Separations, he was named Commercial Director for Liquid Separations, Dow Pacific in 1994. In 1998, he was appointed Global Business Director for Liquid Separations and President and CEO of FilmTec Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Dow. In 2000, he was named General Manager for Dow Thailand and Managing Director for SCC-Dow Group of joint venture companies. In 2002, he became CEOChief Executive Officer of The OPTIMAL Group, affiliate of Petroliam Nasional Berhad (PETRONAS), Malaysia’s state-owned oil corporation and Dow. He added responsibility for the Southeast Asia and Australia region in 2004. Mr. Fitterling was named Business Vice President for Polyethylene in 2005; President, Basic Plastics in 2007; Vice President of Corporate Development in 2009; Senior Vice President of Corporate Development in April 2010; Executive Vice President of Dow and President, Plastics and Hydrocarbons in August 2010; and Executive Vice President of Dow and President, Corporate Development and Hydrocarbons in March 2011. Mr. Fitterling assumed additional executive oversight of Dow’s Chemicals and Energy Division in August 2011, assumed executive oversight for Feedstocks, Performance Plastics, Asia and Latin America in September 2012, was named Vice Chairman, Business Operations in October 2014, Vice Chairman and Chief Operating Officer in October 2015 and was named to his current role in February 2016. Mr. Fitterling is a member of Dow’s Office of the Chairman and CEO.Chief Executive Officer. He also serves as a member of the board of directors of Sadara Chemical Company. In nominating Mr. Fitterling, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee considered as important factors Mr. Fitterling’shis management experience, financial knowledge and leadership capabilities, including his experience as a leader in a large, geographically diverse publicly-held corporation, his experience and familiarity with financial statements of large business organizations, and his familiarity with an important market area in which Chemical Financial competes.we compete.
Ronald A. Klein, age 58,60, was appointed to the board of directors of Chemical Financialthe Corporation upon completion of theour merger with Talmer Bancorp, Inc. on August 31, 2016, and is Chair of both the Asset and Liability Committee ("ALCO") and Strategic Initiatives Committees and a member of the Audit, Corporate GovernanceCompensation and NominatingPension, Trust and Wealth Management, Credit Administration & Risk Managementand Technology Committees. Mr. Klein previously served as a director of Talmer Bancorp, Inc. and Talmer Bank and Trust beginning in April 2010. Since February 1999, Mr. Klein has served as a director and Chief Executive Officer of Origen Financial, Inc., a financial services company, that was formerly a publicly-traded Mortgage Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) that originated securitized and serviced manufactured home loans.loans until 2008, after which it has managed its securitized loan portfolio and other assets. Mr. Klein is also a principal in JK Ventures, a real estate investment company. Mr. Klein has served on the board of directors of Sun Communities, Inc., a publicly traded REIT that owns and operates manufactured housing communities, since January 2015. In nominating Mr. Klein, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee considered as important factors his financial acumen and his professional experience, including his experience and familiarity with the financial statements and financial disclosure of publicly-held bank holding companies, his experience serving as a director of publicly-held companies, his familiarity with an important market area in which Chemical Financial haswe have expanded itsour operations, and his experience as a chief executive officer of a formerly publicly-held financial services company. In addition, the merger agreement governing the Talmer merger required that Mr. Klein be nominated for election as a director at the 2017 annual meeting.



Richard M. Lievense, age 63,65, has served as a director of Chemical Financialthe Corporation since June 1, 2015 and is Chair of the Trust and Wealth Management and Technology Committees and is a member of the ALCO, Credit Administration & Risk Management Committee.and Bank Secrecy Act ("BSA") Committees. Mr. Lievense is founder and Chairman of InSite Capital, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Chemical Financial.the Corporation, a position he has held since 2016. Mr. Lievense formerly served as Chairman of the board of directors of Lake Michigan Financial Corporation (merged into Chemical Financialuntil its merger with the Corporation on May 31, 2015).2015. Mr. Lievense was the principal founder of Lake Michigan


Financial Corporation, (LMFC),which was established in April 1998, and also served as its President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Lievense served as Chief Executive Officer and President of The Bank of Holland, a formerwholly-owned subsidiary of LMFC.Lake Michigan Financial Corporation. Mr. Lievense started his career at Ohio Citizens Bank. He was also employed by National City Bank and Old Kent Bank and served in various executive management positions. Mr. Lievense serves as a Director of Riverview Development Group and Chairmanon the board of of Grand Angels, LLC. In nominating Mr. Lievense, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee considered as important factors Mr. Lievense’shis extensive experience in the banking industry, his experience in leading a business organization, and his familiarity with an important market area in which Chemical Financial haswe have expanded and operates.operate.

Barbara J. Mahone, age 70,72, was appointed to the board of directors of Chemical Financialthe Corporation upon completion of theour merger with Talmer Bancorp, Inc. on August 31, 2016, and is a member of the Audit, Compensation and Pension, Corporate Governance and Nominating, and Risk Management, ALCO and Strategic Initiatives Committees. Ms. Mahone previously served as a director of Talmer Bancorp, Inc. and Talmer Bank and Trust beginning in March 2013. Ms. Mahone retired from General Motors in 2008 as Executive Director, Human Resources, after 38 years of service. Ms. Mahone served on the board of directors for William Beaumont Health System from 1997 until 2015 and on the board of directors of Charter One Bank from 2002 until 2004. In nominating Ms. Mahone, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee considered as important factors Ms. Mahone’sher depth of knowledge and executive level experience in human resources, her experience and familiarity with the financial statements and financial disclosure of publicly-held bank holding companies, her experience serving as a director of a publicly-held company, and her familiarity with an important market area in which Chemical Financial haswe have expanded and operates. In addition, the merger agreement governing the Talmer merger required that Ms. Mahone be nominated for electionoperate.

Barbara L. McQuade, age 54, has served as a director of the Corporation and Chemical Bank since April 25, 2018 and is a member of the Risk Management, Trust and Wealth Management, ALCO and BSA Committees. She has more than 19 years of experience in leadership positions and public service, including serving as the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan from 2010 until 2017, and serving as vice chair of the Attorney General’s Advisory Committee and co-chair of the Terrorism and National Security Subcommittee. She served as Assistant U.S. Attorney in Detroit for 12 years, serving as Deputy Chief of the national Security Unit. Ms. McQuade is currently a law professor at the 2017 annual meeting.University of Michigan, teaching criminal law, criminal procedure and national security law. She is also a contributor as a legal analyst for MSNBC. She serves on the Board of Directors for SafeHouse Center, Crime Stoppers of Michigan, the Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan and the Hudson-Webber Foundation. In nominating Ms. McQuade, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee considered as important factors her depth of knowledge, substantial executive leadership experience and public service, particularly in the State of Michigan.

John E. Pelizzari, age 61,63, has served as a director of Chemical Financialthe Corporation and Chemical Bank since November 1, 2014 and is Chair of the Credit Administration & Risk and BSA Committees and is a member of the Audit, CompensationCorporate Governance and PensionNominating, ALCO, Technology, Trust and RiskWealth Management and Strategic Initiatives Committees. Mr. Pelizzari is also a community advisory director. Mr. Pelizzari formerly served as Chairman of the board of directors of Northwestern Bancorp, Inc. (merged into Chemical Financial on October 31, 2014) from May 15, 2013 throughuntil it was merged into the Corporation on October 31, 2014. Mr. Pelizzari has served as Chief Operating Officer of Burnette Foods, Inc., a family-owned company that operates fruit and vegetable processing plants in western Michigan, since 2009. Mr. Pelizzari served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Fifth Third Bank of Northern Michigan from 1997 through 2006 and President and Chief Executive Officer of Fifth Third Bank Central Indiana from 2006 through 2009. Mr. Pelizzari serves as Chairman ofhas served on the board of directors of Munson Health Care and has been a director since 2009. Mr. Pelizzari has also served as a director of Crystal Enterprises, Inc. since 2012. In nominating Mr. Pelizzari, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee considered as important factors Mr. Pelizzari’shis experience in the banking industry, his experience in leading a business organization, his familiarity with an important market area in which Chemical Financial haswe have expanded and operates,operate, and his experience in running and managing the financial needs of a business that is typical of many of Chemical Financial’sour customers.
David T. Provost, age 62,64, is Chief Executive Officer and President of the Corporation. Mr. Provost was appointed to theour board of directors of Chemical Financial upon completion of theour merger with Talmer Bancorp, Inc. on August 31, 2016, servesand served as Vice-Chairman of the board of directors of Chemical Financial,our Vice Chairman until June 21, 2017, when he was named Chief Executive Officer and is a member of the Risk Management Committee.President. Mr. Provost previously served as Chief Executive Officer, President and a director of Talmer Bancorp, Inc., and as Chief Executive Officer of Talmer Bank and Trust beginning in 2008 and Chairman of Talmer Bank and Trust beginning in December 2009. Mr. Provost served as President of Talmer Bank and Trust from December 2009 until September 2014. Prior to joining Talmer Bancorp, Inc., Mr. Provost served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of The PrivateBank-Michigan, then a subsidiary of Chicago-based PrivateBancorp, Inc. Mr. Provost also served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Bloomfield Hills Bancorp, and as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of The Private Bank. Mr. Provost also spent 13 years in various capacities at Manufacturers National Bank of Detroit and Manufacturers National Bank of Novi (now Comerica Bank). Mr. Provost has served as a member of the board of directors of Plastipak Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries and as Chairman of its Audit Committee. In nominating Mr. Provost, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee considered as important factors Mr. Provost’shis experience in the banking industry, his extensive experience in leading a business organization, his experience and familiarity with the financial statements and financial disclosure of publicly-held bank holding companies, his experience serving as a director of a publicly-held company, and his familiarity with an important market area in which Chemical Financial haswe have expanded and operates. In addition, the merger agreement governing the Talmer merger required that Mr. Provost be nominated for election as a director at the 2017 annual meeting.operate.



David B. Ramaker, Thomas C. Shafer, age 61, is Chief Executive Officer and President of Chemical Financial. Mr. Ramaker60, was appointed Chief Executive OfficerVice Chairman and President in January 2002 and Chairman in April 2006. Mr. Ramaker has been a director of Chemical Financial since October 2001the Corporation and served as Chairman of the Chemical Financial board of directors until August 31, 2016, preceding Mr. Torgow. Mr. Ramaker is a member of the Risk Management Committee. Mr. Ramaker also serves as Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of Chemical Bank. Mr. Ramaker joined Chemical Bank as Vice President on November 29, 1989. Mr. Ramaker became President of Chemical Bank Key State (merged into Chemical Bank on December 31, 2000) in October 1993. Mr. Ramaker became President and a member of the board of directors of Chemical Bank in September 1996 and Executive Vice President and Secretary to the board of Chemical Financial and Chief Executive Officer of Chemical Bank on January 1, 1997.June 21, 2017. Mr. RamakerShafer was Executive Vice President and Director of Regional and Community Banking of Chemical Bank from November 2016 until June 21, 2017. Mr. Shafer served as Vice Chairman of Talmer Bancorp, Inc. from 2011 until September 2014, and subsequently served as Chief Operating Officer of Talmer Bancorp, Inc. and President of Talmer Bank from September of 2014 until November 2016. Mr. Shafer also served as Chief Executive Officer and President of Chemical Bank until December 31, 2001. He resumed these positions on January 1, 2006. Mr. Ramaker became Chairman of the board of directors of Chemical Bank in January 2002. During the last five years, Mr. Ramaker has servedand as a director of all of the Corporation’s subsidiaries. Mr. Ramaker is also a member of the Executive Leadership Team and the Senior Leadership Team of ChemicalFirst Place Bank, and the board of managers of InSite Capital, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Chemical Financial.Talmer Bancorp, Inc., from January 2013 until it was merged into Talmer Bank in February 2014. Before joining Talmer, Mr. Shafer served Citizens Republic Bancorp for a 16-year period in various executive-level positions, including as Executive Vice President-Regional Banking, Executive Vice President-Commercial Banking, Chief Credit Officer and Executive Vice President-Specialty Banking. In nominating Mr. Ramaker,Shafer, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee considered as important factors Mr. Ramaker’s leadership of, service to and familiarity with Chemical Financial, his extensive experience in the banking industry, his extensive experience in leading a business organization, commercial and familiarity with the financial statements and financial disclosure of publicly-held bank holding companies,retail delivery and his familiarity with the variousan important market areasarea in which Chemical Financial competes.we have expanded and operate.

Larry D. Stauffer, age 71,73, has served as a director of Chemical Financialthe Corporation and Chemical Bank since January 2006 and is ChairmanChair of the Audit Committee and a member of the Corporate GovernanceRisk Management and Nominating and Risk ManagementBSA Committees. Mr. Stauffer formerly served as a director of Chemical Bank West (mergedfrom May 2004 until it was merged into Chemical Bank on December 31, 2005) from May 2004 through December 31, 2005. Mr. Stauffer served from 1984 tountil November 2007 as President of Auto Paint Inc. and Auto Wares Tool Company, both divisions of Auto Wares Inc., an automotive parts distribution company that serves the Midwest section of the United States, headquartered in Grand Rapids, Michigan. Mr. Stauffer served as a consultant ofto Auto Wares Inc. from November 2007 until his retirement in March 2013. In nominating Mr. Stauffer, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee considered as important factors Mr. Stauffer’shis experience in leading a geographically diverse business organization, his familiarity with an important market area in which Chemical Financial competes,we operate and compete, his experience in the automotive industry, and his experience in running and managing the financial needs of a business that is typical of many of Chemical Financial’sour customers.
Jeffrey L. Tate, age 47,49, was appointed to the board of directors of Chemical Financialthe Corporation on March 1, 2017, and is Chair of the Risk Management Committee and a member of the Audit and Risk Management Committees.Committee.  Mr. Tate is Vice President and Business Finance Director for the Corporate Auditor forPackaging and Specialty Plastics segment of The Dow Chemical Company, a position he has held since December 2012.  As leader ofAugust 2017.  He directs and oversees all finance activities to provide strategic and financial counsel for the Corporate Audit department, Mr. Tate is responsible for assessing the adequacy of accounting, financial, and operating controls of Dow’s global operations.businesses. Mr. Tate began his career with Dow career in Louisiana in 1992 and held a variety of accounting and controller roles before relocating to Michigan for several finance leadership assignments in Dow Automotive, Investor Relations, Performance Materials and Performance Plastics. In March 2012, hehis most recent role as corporate auditor, Mr. Tate held oversight for Dow’s Corporate Auditing department and was named to Savoy Magazine’s Top 100 Most Influential Blacks in Corporate America.responsible for ensuring the adequacy and accuracy of all accounting, financial and operating controls of Dow’s global operations. In 2010, Mr. Tate was chosen as a recipient of the National Achievement in Industry Award by the National Association of Black Accountants (NABA).  In 2012, he was named to Savoy Magazine’s Top 100 Most Influential Blacks in Corporate America. He is also a member of the Financial Executives International (FEI); the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA); the Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA); National Black MBA Association; and Omega Psi Phi Fraternity, Incorporated.  Mr. Tate is a Certified Public Accountant and serves on the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s (PCAOB) Standing Advisory Group and the Corporate Advisory Boards of both Consortium and NABA. He also serves in his community on the board of directors of the Midland Community Center Operating Board. Internally, he presides over the Finance function’s diversity and inclusion initiatives and served as past National Co-Chair of the African American Network. He actively recruits on college campuses on behalf of the Company and is often invited to speak on leadership, mentoring, and diversity topics across the country. Mr. Tate earned a Bachelor’s degree in Accounting from the University of Alabama. He also completed various executive education programs including the American Graduate School of International Management at Thunderbird, the Dartmouth College Strategic Finance Leadership Executive Program, and the University of Chicago Booth School of Business Executive Program for Prospective CFOs. In nominating Mr. Tate, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee considered as important factors Mr. Tate’shis experience as a leader in a large, geographically diverse publicly-held corporation, his experience and background as an auditor and certified public accountant, his familiarity with financial statements of large business organizations, and his familiarity with an important market area in which Chemical Financial competes.we operate and compete.



Gary Torgow, age 59,62, was appointed to the board of directors of Chemical Financialthe Corporation upon completion of theour merger with Talmer Bancorp, Inc. on August 31, 2016, and serveshas served as the Executive Chairman of the board of directors succeeding Mr. Ramaker. Mr. Torgow is a member of the Risk Management Committee.since August 2016. Mr. Torgow previously served as Chairman of the board of directors of Talmer Bancorp, Inc. beginning in December 2009 and also served Talmer Bank and Trust in an executive capacity beginning in January 2010. Prior toBefore joining Talmer Bancorp, Inc., Mr. Torgow served asis the founderFounder and Chairman of the Sterling Group, a Michigan-based real estate, development investment and managementinvestment company. Mr. Torgow also served as a board member of the Bank of Bloomfield Hills, on the Michigan Board of The PrivateBank, on the board and audit committee of Jackson National Life Insurance of New York, andYork. Mr. Torgow serves on the board and finance committeeBoard of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan. Mr. Torgow also serves on theis an executive board member of Business Leaders forof Michigan and is a Trustee and board member of the Community Foundation of Southeastern Michigan. He is on the Foundation Board of Wayne State University and is a member of the Beaumont Health trustees. Mr. Torgow is on the Executive Board of the Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Detroit, and is the Board President of Yeshiva Beth Yehudah. In nominating Mr. Torgow, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee considered as important factors Mr. Torgow’shis experience leading a business organization, his experience and familiarity with the financial statements and financial disclosure of publicly-held bank holding companies, his experience serving as a director of a publicly-held company, and his familiarity with an important market area in which Chemical Financial has expandedwe operate and operates. In addition, the merger agreement governing the Talmer merger required that Mr. Torgow be nominated for election as a director at the 2017 annual meeting.compete.
  


Arthur A. Weiss, age 67,69, was appointed to the board of directors of Chemical Financialthe Corporation upon completion of theour merger with Talmer Bancorp, Inc. on August 31, 2016, and is Chair of the Compensation and Pension Committee and a member of the Audit, Corporate Governance and Nominating, CommitteeTrust and the NominatingWealth Management, Technology, Credit Administration & Risk and Risk ManagementStrategic Initiatives Committees. Mr. Weiss previously served as a director of Talmer Bancorp, Inc. and Talmer Bank and Trust beginning in May 2007. Mr. Weiss is a shareholder and Chairman of the board of directors of the law firm of Jaffe, Raitt, Heuer & Weiss, P.C., where he has practiced law since 1976. Mr. Weiss has served on the board of directors of Sun Communities, Inc., a publicly traded Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) that owns and operates manufactured housing communities, since 1996. Mr. Weiss has also served on the board of USMM, LLC, a majority-owned subsidiary of Centene Corporation, a publicly traded company. In nominating Mr. Weiss, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee considered as important factors Mr. Weiss’his years of legal experience, his experience leading a business organization, his experience and familiarity with the financial statements and financial disclosure of publicly-held bank holding companies, his experience serving as a director of a publicly-held company and his familiarity with an important market area in which Chemical Financial haswe have expanded and operates. In addition, the merger agreement governing the Talmer merger required that Mr. Weiss be nominated for election as a director at the 2017 annual meeting.operate.

Franklin C. Wheatlake, age 69,71, has served as a director of Chemical Financialthe Corporation and Chemical Bank since January 2006 and is Chairman of the Corporate Governance and Nominating and Risk Management Committees and a member of the Audit, Corporate Governance and Nominating, Risk Management, Compensation and Pension and Strategic Initiatives Committees. Mr. Wheatlake serves as our Lead Independent Director, a position he has held since April 2014.2014 and has served as the Chairman of the board of Chemical Bank since June of 2017. Mr. Wheatlake served as a director of Chemical Bank West (mergedfrom 2001 until it was merged into Chemical Bank on December 31, 2005) from 2001 through December 31, 2005. Mr. Wheatlake is Chairman of Utility Supply and Construction Company, a company that provides supply chain, material distribution, logistics support and construction services to the electric and gas utility industry and a dealer/principal of Crossroads Chevrolet, an automobile/light truck dealership, both located in Reed City, Michigan.Michigan, a position he has held since 1990. In nominating Mr. Wheatlake, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee considered as important factors Mr. Wheatlake’shis experience in leading a diverse business organization, his familiarity with an important market area in which Chemical Financial competes,we operate and compete, and his experience in running and managing the financial needs of a business that is typical of many of Chemical Financial’sour customers.



Board Committees
Among others, the board of directors has established the following four standing committees:
    Audit Committee
    Compensation and Pension Committee
    Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee
    Risk Management Committee

The following table shows each person currently serving as a director whetherand the person is an independent director and whether thecommittees each director served on the committees identified below during 2016:2018:
Director
Independent
Director(1)
Audit
Committee
Compensation and
Pension
Committee
Corporate
Governance and
Nominating
Committee
Risk Management
Committee
     
Gary E. Anderson(4)
Yes
Member(2)
MemberMemberMember
James R. FitterlingYes
MemberM(2)(1)
ChairmanMMemberCMemberM
Ronald A. Klein(3)
Yes
Member(2)
 MemberMMember
Richard M. LievenseNo
Barbara J. MahoneMMMM
Barbara L. McQuade   Member
Barbara J. Mahone(3)
YesMember MemberMemberM
John E. PelizzariYesMemberMember MemberM
David T. Provost(3)
No   Member
David B. RamakerNoThomas C. Shafer   Member
Larry D. StaufferYesChairmanC MemberMemberM
Jeffrey L. Tate(5)
Yes
MemberM(1)(2)
  MemberC
Gary Torgow(3)
No   Member
Arthur A. Weiss(3)
YesMember MemberCMemberM
Franklin C. WheatlakeYesMMemberMMemberMChairmanChairmanM
M - Member
C- Chair
(1)Independent as that term is defined by NASDAQ Listing Rules, including such definitions applicable to each committee of theThe board of directors upon which he serveshas determined that these individuals have "banking or served. In making this determination,related financial expertise" as defined by the board of directors considered all ordinary course loan and other business transactions between the directors and Chemical Bank.FDIC.
(2)The board of directors has determined that these individuals arethis individual is an “audit committee financial experts”expert” as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission.SEC.
(3)Appointed to the board of directors effective August 31, 2016.
(4)Mr. Anderson will retire from the board of directors effective at the 2017 annual meeting.
(5)Appointed to the board of directors effective March 1, 2017.

Director Independence. NASDAQ listing rules require a majority of our directors and each member of our Audit, Compensation and Pension, and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committees to be independent. The Federal Reserve Board’s Enhanced Prudential Standards also require the chair of our Risk Management Committee to be independent. Our board of directors has adopted Categorical Director Independence Standards to help fulfill its obligations under NASDAQ rules to determine whether any director has a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of the director’s independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director, which we refer to as a “material relationship.” The categorical standards provide that the following relationships are not material relationships for such purposes:

Deposit or lending relationships involving a director or his or her immediate family members if the products being offered are being provided in the ordinary course of our business and on substantially the same terms and conditions, including interest rates and collateral (if applicable), as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with persons not related to us, and, with respect to loans, did not involve more than a normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features and such loans are not nonaccrual, past due, restructured or potential problem loans;

Any relationship between us or one of our subsidiaries, on the one hand, and another entity, including a corporation, limited liability company or partnership, in which a director, or an immediate family member of a director, is a partner in, a controlling shareholder of, or an executive officer of, on the other hand, to which we have made, or from which we have received, payments for property or services, if such payments did not exceed the lesser of $120,000, or 1% of the other entity’s consolidated gross revenues in the current fiscal year or any of the past three fiscal years, and excluding (a) payments arising solely from investments in our securities; or (b) payments under non-discretionary charitable contribution matching programs; and



Contributions made or pledged to any charitable organization, provided, that, neither the director, nor an immediate family member of the director, is currently an executive officer or director of such charitable organization and such contributions did not exceed the greater of $200,000, or 5% of such organization’s annual consolidated gross revenues, in the current fiscal year or any of the past three fiscal years, and excluding non-discretionary charitable contribution matching programs.

Our board of directors, in coordination with our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, evaluated the relevant relationships between each director/director nominee (and his or her immediate family members and affiliates) and Chemical and our subsidiaries and affirmatively determined that all of our directors/director nominees are independent, except for Mr. Provost, Mr. Torgow and Mr. Shafer, due to their employment with Chemical, and Mr. Lievense, due to his previous employment with InSite Capital, LLC, one of our subsidiaries, from 2016 until 2018. Specifically, the following nine of our 13 directors/director nominees are independent under NASDAQ listing rules and our categorical standards: Mr. Fitterling, Mr. Klein, Ms. Mahone, Ms. McQuade, Mr. Pelizzari, Mr. Stauffer, Mr. Tate, Mr. Weiss and Mr. Wheatlake.
Audit Committee.    The Audit Committee was established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. TheOur Audit Committee oversees the accounting and financial reporting processes and audits of theour consolidated financial statements of the Corporation and its subsidiaries on behalf of the board of directors of the Corporation and reports the results of its activities to the board of directors. The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention, evaluation and oversight of the work of theour independent registered public accounting firm engaged by the Corporation.firm. The Audit Committee also oversees and reviews the performance of the Corporation’sour internal audit function. The Audit Committee has the full power and authority to perform the responsibilities of a public company audit committee under applicable law, regulations, NASDAQ Listing Ruleslisting rules and public company custom and practice. The Audit Committee may establish subcommittees with such powers and authority as specifically determined and delegated by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee operates pursuant to a written charter, a current copy of which is available on Chemical Financial’s corporate website at www.chemicalbankmi.com under “Investor Information.” The Audit Committee is comprised solely of “independent directors” as defined by NASDAQ Listing Rules. The Audit Committee has a Pre-Approval Policy to pre-approve the audit and non-audit services performed by theour independent registered public accounting firm. All services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm are either within general pre-approved limits or specifically approved by the Audit Committee. The general pre-approval limits are detailed as to each particular service and are limited by a specific dollar amount for each type of service per project. Subject to certain limitations, the authority to grant pre-approvals may be delegated to one or more members of the Audit Committee. The Pre-Approval Policy requires the Audit Committee to be informed of the services provided under the pre-approval guidelines at the next regularly scheduled Audit Committee meeting. The Audit Committee has the authority to engage consultants, advisors and legal counsel at the expense of the Corporation.
The Audit Committee operates pursuant to a written charter, a current copy of which is available on our corporate website at www.chemicalbank.com under “Investor Information.” The Audit Committee is comprised solely of “independent directors” as defined by NASDAQ listing rules. The Audit Committee met fourtwelve times during 2016.2018.


Compensation and Pension Committee.    TheOur Compensation and Pension Committee (the "Compensation Committee") determines and oversees the Corporation’sour executive compensation philosophy, structure, policies and programs, assesses whether the Corporation’sour compensation structure establishes appropriate incentives for management and employees, reviews salaries, bonuses and other compensation of all executive officers of Chemical Financialthe Corporation and itsour subsidiaries, administers Chemical Financial’sour share-based compensation plans, makes recommendations to the board of directors regarding the grants of share-based compensation awards under these plans, and annually reviews the Corporation’sour benefit programs, including the pension, supplemental pension, nonqualified deferred compensation and 401(k) savings plans. The Compensation and Pension Committee has full power and authority to perform the responsibilities of a public company compensation committee under applicable law, regulations, NASDAQ Listing Rules,listing rules, and public company custom and practice. The Compensation and Pension Committee may establish subcommittees and delegate authority and responsibility to subcommittees or any individual member of the Compensation Committee. In addition, under its Charter, the Compensation Committee can delegate to the Chief Executive Officer authority to determine or recommend the amount or form of compensation paid to other executive officers and Pension Committee.associates subordinate to the Chief Executive Officer. The Compensation and Pension Committee operates pursuanthas also delegated to a written charter, a current copycertain executive officers the authority to make grants of which is available on Chemical Financial’s corporate website at www.chemicalbankmi.com under “Investor Information.” The Compensation and Pension Committee is comprised solely of “independent directors”equity awards to employees that are not otherwise executive officers as defined by NASDAQ Listing Rules.Rule 3b-7 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Compensation and Pension Committee has the authority to engage consultants, advisors and legal counsel at the expense of the Corporation.
The Compensation and PensionCommittee operates pursuant to a written charter, a current copy of which is available on our corporate website at www.chemicalbank.com under “Investor Information.” The Compensation Committee is comprised solely of “independent directors” as defined by NASDAQ listing rules. The Compensation Committee met foureight times during 2016.2018.
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee.    TheOur Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee oversees the Corporation’sour corporate governance responsibilities on behalf of the board of directors and is responsible for the identification and recommendation of individuals qualified to become members of the board of directors for each vacancy that occurs and for each election of directors at an annual meeting of shareholders of the Corporation or itsour subsidiaries. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee has full power and authority to perform the responsibilities of a public company nominating and corporate governance committee under applicable law, regulations, NASDAQ Listing Rules,listing rules, and public company custom and practice. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee may establish subcommittees and delegate authority and responsibility to subcommittees or any individual member of the committee. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee has the authority to engage consultants, advisors and legal counsel at the expense of the Corporation.
The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee operates pursuant to a written charter, a current copy of which is available on Chemical Financial’sour corporate website at www.chemicalbankmi.comwww.chemicalbank.com under “Investor Information.” The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is comprised solely of “independent directors” as defined by NASDAQ Listing Rules. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee has the authority to engage consultants, advisors and legal counsel at the expense of the Corporation.listing rules. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee met threefour times during 2016.2018.
Risk Management Committee.   TheOur Risk Management Committee oversees and assesses the adequacy of the Corporation’sour management of key risks, including credit risk, asset/liability risk, liquidity risk and operational risk. The committeeRisk Management Committee is also responsible for monitoring the Corporation’sour risk management profile and obtaining reasonable assurance of adherence to the Corporation’sour risk management policies. The committee may delegate responsibility for the assessment of certain risks to various committees of management or the board of directors, which must report and make recommendations to the committee concerning specific areas of risk. The committeeRisk Management Committee is responsible for the coordination of the assessment of risks among the various committees to which it delegates any responsibility, and is responsible for ensuring that the Corporation haswe have adequate procedures and processes for assessing risk across all of the Corporation’sour operations. The Risk Management Committee reviews the fiduciary activities of the Corporation and Chemical Bank and has overall responsibility for evaluating and approving the fiduciary policies of the Corporation and Chemical Bank. The committee has the full power and authority to perform the responsibilities of a public company risk management committee under applicable law, regulations, NASDAQ Listing Rules,listing rules, and public company custom and practice. The Risk Management Committee operates pursuant to a written charter, a current copy of which is available on Chemical Financial’s corporate website at www.chemicalbankmi.com under “Investor Information.” In discharging its oversight role, the Risk Management Committee is empowered to investigate any matter brought to its attention, with full access to all books, records, facilities, and personnel of the Corporation. The Risk Management Committee has the authority to engage consultants, advisors and legal counsel at the expense of the Corporation.

The Risk Management Committee operates pursuant to a written charter, a current copy of which is available on our corporate website at www.chemicalbank.com under “Investor Information.” The Risk Management Committee met foursix times during 2016.2018.



Corporate Governance
Board and Annual Meeting Attendance
During 2016, the Chemical Financial2018, our board of directors held six regular meetings and four specialtwelve meetings. All of the directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate number of meetings of the board of directors and meetings of committees on which they served during the year (during the periods that they served). The Corporation hasWe have a policy that requires all members ofdirectors and director nominees to the board of directors to attend theour annual meeting of shareholders each year.shareholders. All of theour directors serving at April 18, 2016and director nominees attended the Corporation’s 2016our 2018 annual meeting.meeting of shareholders.
Director Nominations
The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will consider director candidates recommended by shareholders, directors, officers, third-party search firms and other sources. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will ultimately determine whether a shareholder recommendation will result in a nomination under this process. In considering potential nominees, the committee will review all candidates in the same manner, regardless of the source of the recommendation.recommendation, and will consider the current composition of the board in light of the diverse communities and geographies we serve and the interplay of the candidate’s experience with the experience of the other board members, as well as such other factors as the committee deems appropriate.
NominationsUnder our bylaws, nominations by shareholders may only be made by sending a notice to theour Corporate Secretary of Chemical Financial that sets forth:
    the name, age, business address and residence address of each nominee;
    the principal occupation or employment of each nominee;
    the number of shares of Chemical Financialour common stock beneficially owned by each nominee;
    a statement that each nominee is willing to be nominated and to serve if elected; and
such other information concerning each nominee as would be required under the rules of the Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC to be provided in a proxy statement soliciting proxies for the election of each nominee.

You must send this notice to theour Corporate Secretary of Chemical Financial not less than 120 days before the date of an annual meeting and not more than seven days following the date of notice of a special meeting called for the election of directors. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will evaluate and consider every nominee so proposed by a shareholder and report each such nomination and the committee’s recommendation to the full board of directors. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee may also, in its discretion, consider shareholders’ informal recommendations of possible nominees.
In considering possible candidates for election as a director, the committee and the other directors will be guided by applicable rules and regulations, any specific criteria established by the committee and the following criteria:
Each candidate should:should have:
be
a demonstrated breadth and depth of management and/or leadership experience, preferably in a senior leadership role (e.g. chief executive officer, managing partner, president);
financial literacy or other professional or business experience relevant to an individualunderstanding of the highest characterCorporation and integrityits business; and have an inquiring mind, vision
a demonstrated ability to think and act independently as well as the ability to work well with others;constructively in a collegial environment.
be free of any conflict of interest that would violate any applicable law or regulation or interfere with the proper performance of the responsibilities of a director;
possess substantial and significant experience that would be of particular importance to the Corporation in the performance of the duties of a director;
have sufficient time available to devote to the affairs of the Corporation in order to carry out the responsibilities of a director; and
    have the capacity and desire to represent the balanced, best interests of the shareholders as a whole.
In addition, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee may consider factors such as business and industry experience, public company experience, education, independence, gender, race, national origin, and familiarity with the Corporation’sour market areas. The board of directors believes that the Corporation and itsour shareholders are best served by having a board of directors that brings a diversity of education, experience, skills, and perspective to board meetings. The board of directors welcomes opportunities to include diverse perspectives, talents, ideas and contributions. Consistent with this philosophy, the board of directors may consider factors and characteristics that are pertinent to diversity, such as race and gender, when evaluating nominees to stand for election or re-election to the board.

Shareholder Communication with the Board
Shareholders and interested parties may communicate with members of Chemical Financial’sour board of directors by sending correspondence addressed to the board as a whole, a specific committee, or a specific board member c/o William C. Collins, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, Chemical Financial Corporation, 235 E. Main Street, Midland, Michigan 48640. All correspondence will be forwarded directly to the applicable members of the board of directors.

Board Leadership Structure
The positionsboard does not have a policy regarding the separation of the roles of Chief Executive Officer of Chemical Financial and ChairmanChair of the board because the board believes it is in our best interests to make that determination based on the membership of directorsthe board. The board believes that presently it is in our best interest that the positions of Chair and Chief Executive Officer are held by separate individuals. Succeedingseparate. The board believes that this separation is presently appropriate as it allows Mr. Ramaker,Provost, as Chief Executive Officer, to focus primarily on leading our day-to-day operations, while Mr. Torgow, was appointedthe Chair, can focus on leading the board in its consideration of strategic issues and monitoring corporate governance, community relations and shareholder issues. The board has also determined that having Mr. Torgow, who also serves as our Executive Chairman, serve as Chair of the board is in the best interest of directors effective August 31, 2016. Mr. Provost was appointed Vice-Chairman of the board of directors effectiveour shareholders at the same time. The board of directors believesthis time because this structure is appropriate from a governance perspectivemakes the best use of Mr. Torgow's extensive experience in light of the importance of successfully integrating Talmer withboard and into Chemical Financial. community relations, particularly in our market areas.

In order to provide for a greater role for the independent directors in theour oversight, of the Company, the Company haswe have also appointed a Lead Independent Director, Mr. Wheatlake. Chemical Financial hasWe also have an independent director serving as the chairpersonChair of each of the Audit Committee, the Compensation and Pension Committee, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, and the Risk Management Committee.

The duties and responsibilities of the Lead Independent Director include:
acting as a liaison and channel for communication between the Chief Executive Officer, the Executive Chair and the other directors;
providing leadership to ensure the board works cohesively and independently and during times of crisis;
advising the Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Chair as to the quality, quantity and timeliness of the flow of information from Chemical Financial’sour management to the directors;
being available as a resource to consult with the Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Chair and the other directors on corporate governance practices and policies;
together with management where appropriate, considering questions of conflicts of interest of the Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Chair and the other directors;
coordinating the assessment of board committee structure, organization and charters and evaluating the need for change;
coordinating, developing the agenda for, and leading executive sessions of the independent directors and communicating the results thereof to the Chief Executive Officer;
ensuring the appropriate segregation of duties between the directors and management; and
together with the chairperson of the Compensation and Pension Committee, communicating the board’s evaluation of the performance of the Chief Executive Officer.
Common Stock Ownership Guidelines
In January 2008, the board of directors established stock ownership guidelines for its directors. Directors, as of April 30, 2008, are required to retain ownership equal to five times the paid annual equity retainer, with a five year timeframe to attain the designated ownership level. Directors appointed to the board after April 2008 are required to retain ownership equal to five times the paid annual retainer (sum of equity and cash retainers) with a five year timeframe to attain the designated ownership level.
In December 2008, the Compensation and Pension Committee implemented stock ownership guidelines that set forth the expected investment in shares of Chemical Financialour common stock for the named executive officers and other executive and senior officers of the Corporation and Chemical Bank. Expected ownership is expressed as a percentage of base salary, as determined from time to time. The expected ownership for the named executive officers is as follows: Mr. RamakerProvost - 500%; Mr. Klaeser - 300%; Ms. GwizdalaMr. Torgow - 300%; Mr. Amat – 300%; Mr. KohnShafer – 300%; and Mr. RathbunRyan – 300%. Each named executive officer, as well as each other executive and senior officer of the Corporation, or Chemical Bank, is allowed five years from the date the guidelines first become applicable to him or her to achieve the expected stock ownership.

Individuals who acquire shares of common stock under the Corporation’sour equity-based incentive plans must hold at least 50% of all net after-tax acquired shares until the earlier of the time such stock ownership guidelines are satisfied or 36 months following acquisition.

Anti-Hedging Policy
Our anti-hedging policy aligns the interests of our directors and executive officers with our shareholders. The policy prohibits our directors and executive officers from engaging in any transaction which could hedge or offset decreases in the market value of Chemical Financial’sour common stock, including short-selling, put or call options, forward sale or purchase contracts, equity swaps, and exchange funds.

Boards Role in Risk Oversight
Chemical Financial hasWe have appointed a Risk Management Committee of the board of directors. The Risk Management Committee is discussed under the subheading “Board Committees – Committees–Risk Management CommitteeCommittee” of this proxy statement.
Board Tenure Limits
The policies of the board of directors require that directors retire from the board at the next annual meeting of the Corporationour shareholders which occurs after the director’s 72nd birthday. Mr. Stauffer, a member of our board and Chair of our Audit Committee, turned 72 in 2017, and Ms. Mahone, a member of our board, turned 72 in 2018. However, given our pending merger with TCF Financial Corporation, each of their breadth of knowledge with respect to our operations, and, with respect to Mr. Stauffer, his role as Chair of our Audit Committee, and, with respect to Ms. Mahone, her executive level experience in human resources, the board of directors determined that it was in our best interests to waive the mandatory retirement policy with respect to Mr. Stauffer and Ms. Mahone in 2019, and re-nominate each to serve an additional one-year term. In addition, directors are required to submit a resignation in the event of a significant change in the director’s personal or professional circumstances that would reasonably cause a re-examination of the director’s continued membership on the board. The resignation must be submitted annually to the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, and the decision whether to accept the resignation is madedetermined by vote of the full board.

The board of directors has adopted a policy limiting the tenure of any director to a maximum period of twelve12 years. Under the policy, members of the board of directors who were serving as of the date of adoption of the policy may serve for up to an additional period of twelve12 years from that date, subject to the Corporation’sour policy requiring mandatory retirement for directors at age 72. Prospectively, newly elected directors may serve for a period of twelve12 years, or until mandatory retirement at age 72, whichever occurs first. The policy provides that the twelve12 year service limitation may be modified by the board of directors in individual cases, if the particular expertise of a director and the needs of the Corporation make it desirable to grant such an extension.

Directors that are appointed to the board of directors in connection with an acquisition will be subject to annual reelection to one year terms assuming they continue to satisfy the qualification requirements. Such directors will serve for a predetermined transition period following the acquisition, not to exceed two years. At the end of the predetermined transition period, such directors must submit to the board of directors a resignation and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will determine whether or not to accept such resignation.

Uncontested Election Director Resignation Policy

In an uncontested election of directors (i.e., an election where the only nominees are those recommended by the board of directors), any nominee for director who receives a greater number of votes “withheld” from his or her election than votes “for” his or her election must promptly tender his or her resignation to the board of directors. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee must promptly consider the resignation and recommend to the board of directors whether to accept or reject the resignation. The board of directors must then act on the committee’s recommendation and determine whether to accept or reject the recommendation. Following the board’s decision, the Corporationwe will promptly disclose the board of directors’ decision and process (including, if applicable, the reasons for rejecting the resignation) in a periodic or current report filed with the SEC. Any director who tenders his or her resignation is not permitted to participate in the committee’s recommendation or the board’s decision.
Assessment of Board Performance
The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is responsible for coordinating the annual evaluation of the board of directors’ performance. The committee will receive comments from all directors relative to the board’s performance and such comments will be discussed with the full board. The purpose of the evaluation is to increase the effectiveness of the board as a whole and not to focus on the performance of individual directors. The Corporate Governance and Nominating committee will also utilize the results of this evaluation process when determining the characteristics and assessing critical skills required of prospective candidates for nomination or appointment to the board and making recommendations to the board with respect to assignments of directors to the various board committees.
The board of directors and each committee of the board of directors conducts an annual self-assessment survey. The survey utilizes questionnaires completed by each board and committee member. The responses are compiled and shared with the board, and provide a useful tool for evaluation of the effectiveness of theour governance and management of the Corporation.management.


Audit Committee Report
The Audit Committee oversees the Company’sour financial reporting process and itsour internal control over financial reporting and related disclosure controls and procedures on behalf of the board of directors. Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process, including the application of accounting and financial principles, the preparation, presentation and integrity of the financial statements, the systems of internal controls and other procedures designed to ensure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations.
In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited consolidated financial statements and related disclosures that are included in the Company’s 2016our 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K with management, including a discussion of the quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments and estimates, the clarity of disclosures in and concerning the financial statements, and the internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures that support management’s accounting and disclosure judgments and the certifications of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer that theour financial statements of the Company fairly present, in all material respects, theour financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the Company.flows. The Audit Committee also reviewed management’s report on its assessment of the effectiveness of Chemical Financial’sour internal control over financial reporting and the independent registered public accounting firm’s report on the effectiveness of Chemical Financial’sour internal control over financial reporting.
All audit and non-audit services provided to the Companyus by itsour independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP ("KPMG"), and the associated fees are pre-approved by the Audit Committee or by the Chair of the Audit Committee pursuant to delegated authority, and the committeeCommittee considers the compatibility of such non-audit services with the registered public accounting firms’firms' independence. The Audit Committee evaluated the performance of KPMG, LLP, including the senior audit engagement team, and determined to retain KPMG LLP to serve as the Company’sour independent registered public accounting firm for the year ended December 31, 2016.2019. In doing so, the Audit Committee considered the quality and efficiency of the services provided by the independent registered public accounting firmKPMG and theits technical expertise, of the independent registered public accounting firm, tenure as the Company’sour independent registered public accounting firm, and knowledge of the Company’sour operations and industry. Although the Audit Committee has the sole authority to appoint the independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee continued its long-standing practice of recommending that the board of directors ask shareholders to ratify the appointment of theour independent registered public accounting firm at the 20162019 Annual Meeting (see Proposal 42 – Ratification of Appointment of KPMG). KPMG LLP).has served as the Corporation's independent registered public accounting firm for thirteen years. The Audit Engagement Partner rotates every five years, and the Audit Committee is involved in the selection of the Audit Engagement Partner.
The Audit Committee’s meetings included executive sessions with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firmKPMG and with the Company’sour director of internal audit. The Audit Committee meets with the Company’sour internal audit staff and the independent registered public accounting firm,KPMG, with and without management present, to discuss the overall scope and plans for their respective audits, results of their examinations, their evaluations of internal controls, including internal controls over financial reporting, and the overall quality of the Company’sour financial reporting. The Audit Committee’s meetings also included reviewing the Company’sour planned public disclosures of quarterly and annual financial results, including review with management and the independent registered public accounting firmKPMG of theour financial statements and management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations disclosures in the Company’sour Annual Report on Form 10-K and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q filings prior tobefore filing with the SEC and of matters relating to the Company’sour internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures for such filings.

Numerous other informal meetings and communications among the Audit Committee Chair, various Audit Committee members, the independent registered public accounting firm,KPMG, the director of internal audit, the chief financial officer and the director of risk management also occurred. The agenda for each of the Audit Committee’s meetings is established by the Audit Committee Chair and the director of internal audit.
In its meetings with representatives of the independent registered public accounting firm,KPMG, the Audit Committee asked them to address, and discuss their responses to, questions relevant to the Audit Committee’s oversight. These discussions included significant accounting judgments or estimates made by management in preparing theour financial statements, fair presentation to investors in the financial statements of the Company’sour financial position and performance in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and SEC disclosure requirements, and implementation of internal controls and internal audit procedures that are appropriate for the Company.


Corporation.
The independent registered public accounting firmKPMG is responsible for expressing an opinion as to whether theour consolidated financial statements of Chemical Financial are presented fairly, in all material respects, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The Audit Committee has also discussed with KPMG the independent registered public accounting firmfirm's assessment of our internal controls and the matters required to be discussed with the Audit Committeedisclosed by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s Auditing Standard No. 16, 1301, "Communications with Audit Committees." The Audit Committee has also received and discussed the written disclosures and the letter from KPMG required by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Rule 3526, "Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence", and has conducted a discussion with KPMG regarding its independence. In addition, the Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accounting firm required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent registered public accounting firm’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the independent registered public accounting firm’s independence. In addition, the Committee has received written materials addressing KPMG LLP’sKPMG’s internal quality control procedures.


Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the board of directors (and the board approved) that the audited consolidated financial statements and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of Chemical Financial’sour internal control over financial reporting be included in Chemical Financial’sour Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20162018 to be filed with the SEC.(1) A copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K is part of the Annual Report to Shareholders included with these proxy materials.
Respectfully Submitted,
 
Larry D. Stauffer, ChairmanChairJohn E. Pelizzari
Gary E. AndersonArthur A. WeissJeffrey L. Tate
James R. FitterlingFranklin C. Wheatlake
Ronald A. KleinBarbara J. Mahone 


(1)Mr. Tate joined the Audit Committee in March 2017 and did not participate in the review and discussion referred to under Audit Committee Report.




Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
KPMG LLP served as theour independent registered public accounting firm for Chemical Financial for the years ended December 31, 20162018 and 2015.2017. The Audit Committee has reappointed KPMG LLP for the year ending December 31, 2017.2019. In accordance with prior practice, representatives of KPMG LLP are expected to be present at the annual meeting of shareholders on April 26, 2017,May 7, 2019, will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so, and are expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.
Fees
A summary of the fees paid and payable to KPMG LLP for each of the two calendar years ended December 31, 20162018 are as follows:
20162015
  20182017
Audit Fees(1)
$1,733,846
$1,089,287
$1,879,077
$1,778,620
Audit-Related Fees(2)
387,645
159,710
80,000
81,050
Tax Fees(3)
876,803
449,998
751,465
1,083,379
All Other Fees



Total$2,998,294
$1,698,995
$2,710,542
$2,943,049
(1)Audit of the consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year (including services relating to the audit of internal control over financial reporting under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), procedures related to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act, quarterly review procedures for Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and acquisition-related audit procedures.

(2)Services related to accounting matters not arising as part of the audit, including fees related to acquisition-related matters in 2015 and 2016.assurance services related to mortgage operations.

(3)Fees primarily related to tax consulting and acquisition-related tax matters and also includes tax compliance services beginning in 2015.services.

All services provided by the independent registered public accounting firmKPMG in 20162018 and 20152017 were either within general pre-approved limits established by the Audit Committee or specifically approved by the Audit Committee. For additional information about the Audit Committee’s pre-approval policy, see “Board Committees – Committees–Audit Committee.Committee.


Ownership of Chemical Financial Common Stock
Five Percent Shareholders
The following table lists the only shareholders known by the Corporationus to have been the beneficial owners of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Chemical Financialour common stock as of December 31, 2016:March 12, 2019:
Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock(1)
 
Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock(1)
 
Name and Address of
Beneficial Owner
Sole
Voting
Power
 Shared
 Voting
 Power(2) 
Sole
Dispositive
Power
Shared
Dispositive
Power(2) 
Total
Beneficial
Ownership
Percent
of Class
Sole
Voting
Power
 Shared
 Voting
 Power(2) 
Sole
Dispositive
Power
Shared
Dispositive
Power(2) 
Total
Beneficial
Ownership
Percent
of Class
  
BlackRock, Inc.(3)
6,621,650

6,892,417

6,892,417
9.6%8,303,126

8,480,147

8,480,147
11.9%
55 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10022
  
  
55 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10055
  
The Vanguard Group(4)
97,391
7,408
5,538,068
101,416
5,639,484
7.9%70,560
8,208
6,766,754
71,607
6,838,361
9.6%
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, PA 19355
    
  
  
  
(1)The numbers of shares stated are based on information furnished by each shareholder listed and include shares beneficially owned by that shareholder under applicable regulations. Under these regulations, a beneficial owner of a security includes any person who, directly or indirectly, has or shares voting power or dispositive power with respect to the security. We have based our calculation of the percentage of beneficial ownership on 71,538,472 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 12, 2019.

(2)These numbers include shares over which the listed shareholder is legally entitled to share voting or dispositive power by reason of joint ownership, trust, or other contract or property right.

(3)Based on information filed with the SEC on Schedule 13G13G/A on January 23, 2017.24, 2019. BlackRock, Inc., an investment management firm, in its role as investment advisor or manager, possesses investment and/or voting power over these shares of Chemical Financialour common stock and may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of these shares.

(4)Based on information filed with the SEC on Schedule 13G13G/A on February 10, 2017.11, 2019. The Vanguard Group, an investment management firm, in its role as investment advisor or manager, possesses investment and/or voting power over these shares of Chemical Financialour common stock and may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of these shares.
 



Ownership of Chemical Financial Common Stock by Directors and Executive Officers
The following table sets forth information concerning the number of shares of Chemical Financialour common stock held as of December 31, 2016March 12, 2019 by each of Chemical Financial’sour directors, and nominees for director, (except for Messrs. Provost and Torgow), each of the named executive officers who are included in the Summary Compensation Table,officer, and all of Chemical Financial’sour directors nominees for director and executive officers as a group. For Messrs. Provost and Torgow, the table sets forth information concerning the number of shares of Chemical Financial common stock held as of January 31, 2017 due to their exercising stock options and selling a portion of their Chemical Financial common stock during January 2017.
Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock(1)  
 
Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock(1)  
 
Name of
Beneficial Owner
Sole Voting
or 
Dispositive
Power
Shared
Voting or
Dispositive
Power(2)
Stock Options
Exercisable
Within 60 Days
Stock
Units(3)
Total
Beneficial
Ownership
Percent
of Class
Sole Voting
or 
Dispositive
Power
Shared
Voting or
Dispositive
Power(2)
Stock Options
Exercisable
Within 60 
Days
Stock
Units(3)
Total
Beneficial
Ownership
Percent
of Class
  
L. Amat1,444
9,497
17,434
2,193
30,568
*
G. E. Anderson14,664
12,993


27,657
*
J. R. Fitterling21,544



21,544
*18,414


6,442
24,856
*
L. A. Gwizdala48,395
650
50,765
6,375
106,185
*
D. L. Klaeser78,776

76,185

154,961
*49,413



49,413
*
R. A. Klein31,949

20,317
126
52,392
*20,725

17,698
2,554
40,977
*
T. W. Kohn44,217
8,034
52,251
6,626
111,128
*
R. M. Lievense15,000
44,597
28,030

87,627
*
18,000

4,738
22,738
*
B. J. Mahone19,278


126
19,404
*13,278


4,363
17,641
*
B.L. McQuade


2,831
2,831
*
J. E. Pelizzari4,481


9
4,490
*4,481


5,251
9,732
*
D. T. Provost101,768
283


102,051
*94,394
283


94,677
*
D. B. Ramaker1,013
90,969
156,119
17,403
265,504
*
R. S. Rathbun
9,266
22,718
1,416
33,400
*
J. B. Ryan




*
T. C. Shafer25,175

5,843

31,018
*
L. D. Stauffer18,706
4,434


23,140
*
14,053

6,315
20,368
*
J. L. Tate




 


5,467
5,467
*
G. Torgow104,068
1,339


105,407
*93,338
1,339


94,677
*
A. A. Weiss43,933


251
44,184
*16,433


6,406
22,839
*
F. C. Wheatlake6,110
82,294


88,404
*6,430
82,294

2,422
91,146
*
Group Total555,346
264,356
423,819
34,525
1,278,046
1.8%342,081
115,969
23,541
46,789
528,380
*
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (23 persons)651,361
282,913
577,770
43,487
1,555,531
2.2%
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (24 persons)415,617
143,393
113,914
46,789
719,713
1.0%
*LessDenotes less than 1%. ownership.
(1)We have based our calculation of the percentage of beneficial ownership on 71,538,472 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 12, 2019. The numbers of shares stated are based on information furnished by each person listed and include shares beneficially owned by that person under applicable regulations. Under these regulations, a beneficial owner of a security includes any person who, directly or indirectly, has or shares voting power or dispositive power with respect to the security. A person will also be considered the beneficial owner of a security if the person has a right to acquire beneficial ownership of the security within 60 days. Shares held in various fiduciary capacities through the Wealth Management Department of Chemical Bank are not included. Chemical FinancialThe Corporation and the directors and officers of Chemical Financialthe Corporation and Chemical Bank disclaim beneficial ownership of shares held by the Wealth Management Department in fiduciary capacities.

(2)These numbers include shares over which the listed person is legally entitled to share voting or dispositive power by reason of joint ownership, trust, or other contract or property right, and shares held by spouses and children over whom the listed person may have influence by reason of relationship. Shares held in various fiduciary capacities through the Wealth Management Department of Chemical Bank are not included. Chemical Financial and the directors and officers of Chemical Financial and Chemical Bank disclaim beneficial ownership of shares held by the Wealth Management Department in fiduciary capacities.

(3)These numbers include stock units credited to each director’s account under the Chemical Financial Corporation Directors’ Deferred Stock Plan. Distributions of shares of our common stock of Chemical Financial equal to the number of stock units in the participating director’s account will occur upon the director’s retirement, termination of service, death or a change in control of Chemical Financial. These numbers also include restricted stock performance units earned by the named executive officers as of December 31, 2016 that became vested on February 28, 2017.Corporation.



Executive Officers
Our executive officers are appointed annually by, and serve at the pleasure of, the board of directors. Biographical information for Mr. RamakerProvost, Mr. Shafer and Mr. Torgow is included in the “Board of Directors” section of this proxy statement. The following sets forth biographical information concerning our executive officers who are not directors. Except as otherwise indicated, each executive officer has had the same principal occupation and employment during the past five years. The age of each executive officer is as of December 31, 2016.2018.
Leonardo AmatGregory R. Bixby, age 48,53, is Executive Vice President, Chief Technology and Chief OperatingOperations Officer, – Business Operations of Chemical Bank. Mr. Amat joined Shoreline Bank, a bank subsidiary of Shoreline Financial Corporation (Shoreline) in 1991. Shoreline merged with Chemical Financialposition he was named to in January 2001.2019. Before that, Mr. Amat was named Vice President and Regional Manager – Commercial Loans in 1998 andBixby served as a Community Bank President from 2002 to 2007. Mr. Amat served as Regional President of the South Region from 2007 to May 2012 and as Executive Vice President, and Chief Risk ManagementDelivery Officer from May 2012September 2017 until December 2018. With over 30 years of experience in technology and operations, he is responsible for Information Technology, Deposit Operations, Loan Operations, Electronic Banking, Business Intelligence and the Project Management Office. Prior to April 19, 2015.joining Chemical Bank, Mr. AmatBixby was namedan executive of Sunflower Bank leading a transformational merger. From 2011 to 2016, Mr. Bixby was Executive Managing Director, Chief Information Officer for Talmer Bank and Trust. He also served as Chief Operating Officer – Business Operations on April 20, 2015.of First Place Bank from May 2013 until February 2014, when First Place Bank was merged with and into Talmer Bank. Mr. AmatBixby’s previous roles included Chief Information Officer for Capitol Bancorp Ltd. from 2007 through 2011, Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer for Republic Bancorp Inc. from 1997 through 2007, and Vice President of Information Technology for Republic Bancorp Mortgage Inc. from 1993 through 1996. Mr. Bixby is a member of the Executive Leadership Team and the Senior Leadership Team of Chemical Bank.
William C. Collins, age 64,66, is Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Chemical Financialthe Corporation and Chemical Bank, a position he has held since May 16, 2011. Mr. Collins served as a partner of the law firm of Currie Kendall PLC from 1983 tountil 2005 and as its managing partner from 2005 tountil May 15, 2011. Mr. Collins is a member of the Executive Leadership Team and the Senior Leadership Team of Chemical Bank.
Lori A. Gwizdala, age 58, is Executive Vice President of Special Projects of Chemical Bank. Prior to August 31, 2016, Ms. Gwizdala served as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Chemical Financial and Chemical Bank. Ms. Gwizdala joined Chemical Financial as Controller on January 1, 1985 and was named Chief Financial Officer in May 1987, Senior Vice President in February 1991, Treasurer in April 1994 and Executive Vice President in January 2002. Ms. Gwizdala served as a director of Chemical Bank West (consolidated into Chemical Bank) from January 2002 until December 31, 2005. From May 2015 to December 2016, Ms. Gwizdala served on the board of managers of InSite Capital, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Corporation. Ms. Gwizdala is a member of the Executive Leadership Team andthe Senior Leadership Team of Chemical Bank. Ms. Gwizdala has served as Treasurer of the Chemical Bank Foundation’s Board of Trustees since January 2013. Ms. Gwizdala has served as a member of Ferris State University’s Board of Trustees since December 2012. Ms. Gwizdala is a certified public accountant.
Lynn M. Kerber, age 48, is Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer of Chemical Bank. Ms. Kerber joined Citizen’s Trust and Savings Bank, a subsidiary of Shoreline Financial Corporation (Shoreline) in 1990. Shoreline merged with Chemical Financial in January 2001. Ms. Kerber was named Vice President and Commercial Loan Officer in 2000, Senior Vice President in 2004 and a Community Bank President in 2005. Ms. Kerber served as Regional President of the West Region from 2009 to May 2012 and as Executive Vice President and Regional President of the South Region from May 2012 to April 19, 2015. Ms. Kerber was named Chief Risk Management Officer on April 20, 2015. Ms. Kerber is a member of the Executive Leadership Team and the Senior Leadership Team of Chemical Bank. Ms. Kerber has served as President of the Chemical Bank Foundation’s Board of Trustees since January 2013.
Dennis L. Klaeser, age 59,61, is Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Chemical Financialthe Corporation and Chemical Bank. Mr. Klaeser is alsoBank and Treasurer of Chemical Financial.the Corporation, a position he has held since August 2016. Before that, Mr. Klaeser served as Chief Financial Officer and an Executive Managing Director of Talmer Bancorp, Inc. from May 2010 tountil Talmer Bancorp's merger with the Corporation on August 31, 2016. Mr. Klaeser also served as Chief Financial Officer and a director of First Place Bank following its acquisition by Talmer Bancorp, Inc. from January 2013 until it was merged into Talmer Bank and Trust in February 2014. Mr. Klaeser is a member of the Executive Leadership Team and the Senior Leadership Team of Chemical Bank. Mr. Klaeser has also served on the board of managers of InSite Capital, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Corporation, since December 2016. Mr. Klaeser was a senior Midwest bank analyst with Raymond James from April 2009 to May 2010. From 2003 until 2009, Mr. Klaeser was Chief Financial Officer of PrivateBancorp, Inc., where he was responsible for financial and accounting functions as well as strategic planning, capital markets, SEC, regulatory and board reporting, Sarbanes-Oxley, and investor relations. From 2000 through 2002, Mr. Klaeser was Managing Director and Head of the Financial Institutions Group for Anderson Corporate Finance, a division of Arthur Andersen, where he was responsible for advising financial institutions on complex merger and acquisition transactions, restructuring, and divestures. Mr. Klaeser also spent seven years as an investment banker and was head of the Financial Institutions Group at EVEREN Securities, which was acquired by First Union Securities.
Thomas W. Kohn, age 62, is Chief Executive Officer Mr. Klaeser has served as Treasurer of InSite Capital, LLC and Vice Chairman of Chemical Bank. Mr. Kohn became affiliated with the Company on December 31, 1981 through a bank acquisition and served the Company in various capacities until 1986. Mr. Kohn rejoined the Company in 1991 as President of Chemical Bank Montcalm (consolidated into Chemical Bank West) andFoundation’s Board of Trustees since May 2017. Mr. Klaeser also has served in that position until January 2002. Mr. Kohn served as President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of


Chemical Bank West (consolidated into Chemical Bank) from January 2002 until December 31, 2005. Mr. Kohn was Executive Vice President, Community Banking, of Chemical Bank from January 1, 2006 until April 2015 and Secretary of Chemical Financial from April 2007 to May 16, 2011. Mr. Kohn was named Vice Chairman of Chemical Bank and a member of the Board of Trustees for Lawrence University of Wisconsin since November 2018.
Sandra D. Kuohn, age 54, is Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resource Officer for the Corporation and Chemical Bank board of directors on April 20, 2015. Mr. KohnBank. Ms. Kuohn was appointed to this position upon completion of our merger with Talmer Bancorp, Inc. on August 31, 2016. Ms. Kuohn previously served as the Chief ExecutiveHuman Resource Officer for Talmer Bank beginning in July 2011. Prior to Talmer Bank, Ms. Kuohn spent 11 years as the Global Vice President of Human Resources for Urban Science, Inc. headquartered in Detroit, Michigan. In that capacity, she was responsible for recruiting, compensation and tobenefits, career development, and performance management across ten different countries around the board of managers of InSite Capital, LLC,world. Before, Ms. Kuohn owned her own consulting business for five years and started her career with Anderson Consulting in Detroit. Ms. Kuohn is a wholly-owned subsidiarymember of the Corporation, on August 17, 2015. Mr. KohnExecutive Board of Trustees for the CATCH charity and chairs their annual Detroit News/CATCH Outstanding Graduates program. Ms. Kuohn is a member of the Executive Leadership Team and the Senior Leadership Team of Chemical Bank.
Christopher McComish, age 54, is Executive Vice President and Chief Banking Officer of Chemical Financial and Chemical Bank, a position he has held since June 18, 2018. Mr. Kohn hasMcComish previously served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Scottrade Bank from September 2015 to June 2018. He also served as Chief Operating Officer at BMO Harris Bank from 2008 to 2015 and served as Community Banking Executive Director with Wachovia Bank from 1987 to 2008. Mr. McComish is a Vice Presidentmember of the Executive Leadership Team and the Senior Leadership team of Chemical Bank Foundation’s Board of Trustees since January 2013.Bank.


Robert S. Rathbun, age 53,55, is Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer – Customer ExperienceRegional President of the East Region of Chemical Bank. Mr. Rathbun joined Chemical Bank in 1987, working in Corporate Loan Review and Corporate Compliance before transferring to commercial lending in 1997. In 2003, he was promoted to Senior Vice President, Commercial Lending and in 2007 was named Community President of the Midland Community Bank and Senior Lender for the Owosso, Clare and Midland Community Banks. Mr. Rathbun served as Regional President of the East Region of Chemical Bank from May 2012 to April 19, 2015.2015 and was re-appointed to that position on November 13, 2017. Mr. Rathbun was namedserved as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer - Customer Experience onfrom April 20, 2015.2015, until November 13, 2017. Mr. Rathbun was appointed to the board of managers of InSite Capital, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Corporation, on May 31, 2015. Mr. Rathbun is a member of the Executive Leadership Team and the Senior Leadership Team of Chemical Bank. Mr. Rathbun has served as a Vice President of the Chemical Bank Foundation’s Board of Trustees sincefrom January 2013.2013 until August 2017.
Thomas C. ShaferTimothy D. Regan, age 58,57, is Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer of the Corporation and Chemical Bank, a position he has held since August 2017. Mr. Regan previously served as the Director of RegionalBusiness Risk for the Corporation upon completion of our merger with Talmer Bancorp, Inc. on August 31, 2016, and Community Bankingserved as the Chief Risk Officer of Chemical Bank.Talmer Bank and Trust from May 2015 until August 2016. Before that, Mr. ShaferRegan served as the Director of Enterprise Risk from April 2013 until May 2015 and as Director of Internal Audit and Enterprise Risk from 2010 until April 2013 of Talmer Bank and Trust. He has over 35 years of financial institution experience, including as Corporate Secretary, Director, Controller, Chief Financial Officer, General Auditor and Enterprise Risk Officer. Mr. Regan previously served as a member of Trustees of Port Huron Hospital and is currently a member of the McLaren - Port Huron Hospital’s Audit Committee. Mr. Regan is a member of the Executive Leadership Team and the Senior Leadership Team of Chemical Bank. Mr. Shafer served as

J. Brennan Ryan, age 49, is Executive Vice Chairman of Talmer Bancorp, Inc. from 2011 until September 2014,President and subsequently served as Chief Operating Officer of Talmer Bancorp, Inc.the Corporation and President of Talmer Bank.Chemical Bank, a position he has held since July 9, 2018. Mr. Shafer alsoRyan previously served as Chiefa partner at Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP, a 600+ attorney law firm with offices across the United States, where he helped lead the firm’s services in financial institution activities, mergers and acquisitions, public and private capital financings, and multi-company acquisition strategies for large corporate entities. Mr. Ryan is a member of the Executive OfficerLeadership Team and President and as a directorthe Senior Leadership Team of First Place Bank, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Talmer Bancorp, Inc., until it was merged into Talmer Bank in February 2014. Before joining Talmer, Mr. Shafer served Citizens Republic Bancorp for a 16-year period in various executive-level positions, including as Executive Vice President, Regional Banking Executive Vice President of Commercial Banking, Chief Credit Officer and Regional President, and Executive Vice President, Specialty Banking.Chemical Bank.

Daniel W. Terpsma, age 62,64, is Executive Vice President of Commercial Lending of Chemical Bank, a position he has held since September 14, 2015. Mr. Terpsma previously served Chemical Bank as Managing Director - Strategic Growth from November 1, 2014 tountil September 13, 2015. Before that, Mr. Terpsma served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Northwestern Bank from 2013 to October 31, 2014, whenuntil it was acquired by Chemical Financial.the Corporation on October 31, 2014. Mr. Terpsma previously held senior management positions from 1983-2012 with Old Kent Financial Corporation, LaSalle Bank/ABN Amro Corporation, Bank of America Corporation and Westwater Group. Mr. Terpsma is a member of the Executive Leadership Team and the Senior Leadership Team of Chemical Bank.

James E. Tomczyk, age 64,67, is Executive Vice President and SeniorChief Credit Officer of Chemical Bank.Bank, a position he has held since January 2006. Mr. Tomczyk joined Shoreline Bank in February 1999 as Executive Vice President of its Private Banking, Trust and Investment divisions and became Senior Executive Vice President of these divisions in October 2000. Mr. TomczykHe served as President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Chemical Bank Shoreline (consolidated into Chemical Bank) from January 2002 until December 31, 2005. Mr. Tomczyk was appointed to the board of managers of InSite Capital, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Corporation, on May 31, 2015. Mr. Tomczyk became Executive Vice President and Senior Credit Officer in January 2006. Mr. Tomczyk is a member of the Executive Leadership Team and the Senior Leadership Team of Chemical Bank.

Kathleen S. Wendt, age 45, is Executive Vice President and Deputy Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation and Chemical Bank, a position she has held since July 2018. Ms. Wendt previously served as Executive Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer, a position she held since October 2017. On February 27, 2018, our board appointed Ms. Wendt to serve as our principal accounting officer. Ms. Wendt served as Chief Accounting Officer and an Executive Managing Director of Talmer Bancorp, Inc. from June 2011 until its merger with the Corporation on August 31, 2016. She served as First Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Chemical Bank following the merger with Talmer Bancorp, Inc. until March 2017. Ms. Wendt is a certified public accountant with experience in financial reporting, accounting policy and the management of controls over financial reporting.  Ms. Wendt served in a number of positions with Comerica Incorporated, a financial institution with more than $60 billion in total assets, from May 2003 until June 2011, including Senior Vice President, Director of External Reporting and Senior Vice President, Director of Accounting Policy and Financial Procedures and Controls. Before that, Ms. Wendt served as an Assurance Manager at PricewaterhouseCoopers located in Chicago, Illinois and Zurich, Switzerland. Ms. Wendt is a member of the Executive Leadership Team and the Senior Leadership Team of Chemical Bank.



Compensation and Pension Committee Report
In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Compensation and Pension Committee (“Compensation Committee”) reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by SEC Regulation S-K Item 402(b) with the Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation.. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation and Pension Committee recommended to the board of directors (and the board approved) that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement for the Corporation’s 2017our 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.2018.
Respectfully Submitted,
Arthur A. Weiss, ChairBarbara J. Mahone
James R. Fitterling ChairmanJohn E. Pelizzari
Gary E. AndersonFranklin C. Wheatlake
Barbara J. MahoneRonald A. Klein 
Compensation and Pension Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During 2016,2018, the Compensation and Pension Committee was composed of Mr. Weiss (Chair), Mr. Fitterling, Chairman, Messrs. Anderson, Pelizzari and Wheatlake, Mr. Moore until his retirement effective at the 2016 annual meeting, andKlein, Ms. Mahone beginning on August 31, 2016.and Mr. Wheatlake. None of these members were, during the last fiscal year, an officer or employee of the Corporation or formerly an officer of the Corporation. None of the Corporation’sour executive officers served as a member of a compensation committee (or board committee performing a similar function) of another entity, or served as a director of another entity, for which any executive officer of these entities served as a member of the Compensation and Pension Committee or as a director of the Corporation.

Compensation Consultant

As discussed further under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” in determining the terms and conditions of the executive employment agreements, the Compensation and Pension Committee engaged Aon Hewitt, an independent compensation consultant, to provide compensation analyses of a select group of peer companies. Aon Hewitt was paid aggregate fees of $41,328 for such services. In addition to these services, McLagan, a division of Aon Hewitt, provided incentive plan benchmarking and review services to the Corporation during 2016 and was paid aggregate fees of $187,200 for such services. Management recommended, and the committee approved, such additional services.


Executive Compensation
In this section, we sometimes refer to the Compensation and Pension Committee as the “Committee.”
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
This section discusses materialCompensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) describes our compensation programs, our underlying compensation philosophy and the fundamental elements of the Corporation’s compensation of thepaid to our named executive officers, whose 2018 compensation information is provided in the tables following this discussion. In this proxy statement, our “named executive officers” are the individuals who served as our principal executive officer, our principal financial officer and our three other most highly compensated executive officers in 2018, as set forth in the following table.
Named Executive Officers
David T. ProvostPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Dennis L. KlaeserExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Gary TorgowExecutive Chairman of the Board of Directors
Thomas C. ShaferVice Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Chemical Bank
J. Brennan RyanExecutive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

2018 Financial Highlights

In 2018, we emphasized our “Big Four Initiative,” which represented our top four initiatives for 2018:

generating strategic organic loan and deposit growth;
increasing our operating efficiency and accountability;
developing an exceptional customer service model; and
creating the Chemical culture.

We implemented these initiatives by:

successfully recruiting an outstanding team of commercial lenders to drive growth in our West Michigan, Southeast Michigan and Cleveland markets;
targeting lending growth in products with higher returns;
upgrading our core operating systems to assist in our preparation for future growth, regulatory compliance and customer satisfaction;
reducing expenses; and
becoming Detroit’s Hometown Bank with the city’s selection of Chemical Bank as its new primary banking partner for managing the city’s operating accounts, with expected balances of up to $500 million in deposits, and the move of our headquarters to Detroit.

We produced solid earnings and balance sheet growth in 2018, and reinvested a portion of our cost savings from our 2017 restructuring efforts into enhancements in our core operating systems and the hiring of commercial lenders and other matters relevantkey operational staff, all while maintaining a strong efficiency ratio.

Key performance highlights during the year included:

Continued Net Income Growth

Our net income was $284.0 million in 2018, representing an increase of 90.0% over 2017 and 162.9% over 2016. Our 2018 annual incentive plan included a corporate performance metric based on our adjusted core net income, which was earned at 142.9% of target based on our 2018 adjusted core net income of $276.9 million. See the “Elements of Compensation - Annual Cash Incentive Plan” section of this CD&A for additional information about our adjusted core net income.



Efficiency Ratio

Our efficiency ratio is a measure of operating expenses as a percentage of net interest income and noninterest income. Our efficiency ratio was 54.3% for 2018, 60.1% for 2017 and 67.2% for 2016. Our 2018 annual incentive plan included a corporate performance metric based on our adjusted efficiency ratio, which was achieved at 100% of target based on an adjusted efficiency ratio of 52%. See the “Elements of Compensation - Annual Cash Incentive Plan” section of this CD&A for additional information about our adjusted efficiency ratio.

Strong Loan and Deposit Growth

We experienced organic loan growth of $2.10 billion for 2018, compared to 2017, partially offset by run-off in our acquired loan portfolio of $982.8 million. Our total loans were $15.3 billion at December 31, 2018, an increase of $1.11 billion, or 7.9%, from total loans of $14.2 billion at December 31, 2017. When considering growth, we consider the Corporation’s compensation program.
The Compensationhighest quality loan growth for us to be in commercial and Pension Committee (the Committee) assists the board of directors in discharging its responsibilities relating to executive compensationindustrial loans and in fulfilling its responsibilities relatingowner-occupied commercial real estate, which contributed $616.9 million and $246.0 million, respectively, of our loan growth for 2018. Together, these two loan categories were responsible for 77.4% of our loan growth during 2018.

We grew our total deposits by $1.95 billion, or 14.3%, to Chemical Financial’s compensation and benefit programs and policies. The Committee administers and makes recommendations with respect$15.59 billion for 2018, compared to Chemical Financial’s compensation plans and reviews and approves the compensationtotal deposits for 2017 of executive and senior management. The Committee recommends to the full board of directors$13.64 billion. While competition for approval all components of executive compensation. The Committee currently consists of five directors, all of whom are independent under NASDAQ Listing Rules. The Committee receives recommendations from Chemical Financial’s Chief Executive Officer regarding the compensation of executive and senior management (other than the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer).
Executive Summary
How Did we Perform in 2016?
Chemical Financial’s performance in 2016deposits remained strong on both an absolute basisthroughout our markets during 2018 and relative2017, our efforts to expand deposit relationships with existing and new customers, our peers. Additionally, we successfully completed the merger of Talmer withfinancial strength and into the Chemical family.a general trend in customers holding more liquid assets have resulted in continuing increases in customer deposits.
Chemical Financial’s


Total Shareholder Return

We believe that our total shareholder return, for 2016 was 62% comparedas measured over the long-term, is a valuable and useful tool in gauging company performance and executive compensation alignment with that performance. We also recognize that proxy advisory firms use total shareholder return to 39% forassist in their determination of executive pay alignment over one- and three-year periods. We believe using metrics at specific points in time may result in misleading conclusions when taken out of context or without an understanding of the dynamics driving the results. Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2018, amid concerns over the health of the broader economy, bank stocks in addition to the S&P 500 index as a whole, including our company and many of our peer banks, experienced erosion in stock price and market capitalization. As a result of this recent market volatility, our one-year total shareholder return decreased from December 31, 2017 to December 31, 2018, although our total shareholder return over the one-year period continued to compare favorably to the KBW NASDAQ Regional Banking Index and 12% for theIndex.

chart-a0e7e32477e45637929.jpg
Source: S&P 500 Index. Over the five-year period endingGlobal Market Intelligence

The relative total shareholder return on a $100 investment in our common stock compared to other indices on December, 31 2016 we have significantly outperformed these indexes, as well. Furthermore, we increased our annual cash dividend in 2016 to $1.06 from $1.00 in 2015.2013 (assuming all dividends are reinvested) is shown below:

  December 31,
  2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Chemical Financial Corporation $100
 $99.92
 $115.31
 $186.87
 $188.56
 $132.21
KBW NASDAQ Regional Banking Index 100
 102.42
 108.48
 150.80
 153.45
 126.59
S&P 500 Stock Index 100
 113.69
 115.26
 129.05
 157.22
 150.33


performancea02.jpg
The dollar values forBoth of the cumulative total shareholder returnindices in the table above graph are shown below:

  December 31,
  2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Chemical Financial Corporation  $100.00   $115.71   $159.28   $159.16   $183.67   $297.64 
KBW Nasdaq Regional Banking Index 100.00  113.25  166.31  170.34  180.41  250.80 
S&P 500 Stock Index 100.00  116.00  153.57  174.60  177.01  198.18 

Source: SNL Financial LC, Charlottesville, VA. SNL Financial is a research and publishing firm specializing in the collection and dissemination of data on the banking, thrift and financial services industries.
Note: Both of these indices are based upon total return (including reinvestment of dividends) and are market-capitalization-weighted indices. The S&P 500 Stock Index is a broad equity market index published by S&P. The KBW NasdaqNASDAQ Regional Banking Index is published by Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. (KBW), an investment banking firm that specializes in the banking industry. The KBW NasdaqNASDAQ Regional Banking Index is composed of 50 small and mid-cap U.S. regional banks or thrifts thatwhose shares are publicly traded. The stock performance graph assumes that $100 was invested on December 31, 2011, and that all dividends were reinvested. It should be noted that historical

Note: Historical performance information is nonot a guarantee of future performance.

How Does Performance Relate
Overview of Key Events and Named Executive Officer Compensation for 2018

Below we have summarized key events and compensation decisions regarding our named executive officers that the Committee made regarding 2018 compensation.

Annual Incentive Plan and Metrics

On February 27, 2018, based on the recommendation of the Committee, our board of directors approved the Chemical Financial Corporation Executive Annual Incentive Plan, which we refer to as our annual incentive plan. The Committee also established performance objectives under the plan for 2018, including adjusted net income and adjusted efficiency ratio, as well as individual performance objectives.

Cash incentive payouts in 2018 under our annual incentive plan for all employees, including our NEOs, were earned at 127.5% of target based on our performance and each executive's individual performance, but included the application of negative discretion by the Committee reducing cash payments to 102% of target, as follows:

Specifically, the Committee noted that while our total shareholder return, or TSR, over the preceding five-year period was higher than the KBW NASDAQ Regional Banking Index, the general stock market decline in the fourth quarter of 2018 resulted in a decline in our share value at year-end, causing the Committee to exercise its discretion to reduce actual incentive payouts despite our achievement of the financial metrics under the plan (representing 80% of total award for NEOs) at a level equal to 134.3% of target to 102% of target for Mr. Klaeser and Mr. Shafer

The Committee further determined that to more closely align the interests of David Provost, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and Gary Torgow, our Executive Chairman, with those of our shareholders, it would exercise its discretion under the annual incentive plan not to award a cash incentive payment to either Mr. Provost or Mr. Torgow in 2018. Instead, the Committee awarded each of Mr. Provost and Mr. Torgow 20,364 shares of time-vesting restricted stock units (“TRSUs”) under the 2017 Stock Plan with a grant date fair value equal to approximately $950,000, which approximates the target amount Mr. Provost and Mr. Torgow would have been eligible to receive under the annual incentive plan despite corporate and individual performance earned at 127.5% of target in 2018. Under the restricted stock unit agreement, the TRSUs will vest in equal annual installments over a three-year-period, subject to each officer’s continued service through the vesting date, subject to certain exceptions.

Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards and Metrics

Long-term equity incentive grants in 2018 consisted of annual grants and a strategic award, each consisting of a mix of 60% performance-based restricted stock units, or PRSUs, and 40% TRSUs, as set forth in the table below. The TRSUs vest over a period of five years. The performance metrics underlying the PRSUs are cumulative earnings per share and relative total shareholder return. Mr. Ryan’s long-term equity awards in 2018 were made pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement.

In granting the strategic award, the Committee looked at a number of factors, including each executive’s (a) evolving roles and additional responsibilities, (b) unique ability to drive business to our bank, (c) ability to build strategic partnerships that advance our key business objectives, and (d) their involvement and visibility within our communities that elevates both our visibility and standing. In light of these factors, the Committee also considered the unvested equity position of each executive in Chemical and the potential for disruption to our business, as well as the impact on shareholder value should any of our named executive officers leave, particularly Mr. Provost and Mr. Torgow, and determined that it was in the best interests of Chemical and our shareholders to grant additional equity-based awards. The strategic awards are not intended to be an ongoing component of our named executive officer annual compensation and the 2019 target long-term annual incentive awards approved by the Committee in February 2019 (to be disclosed in next year’s proxy statement) were, on average (excluding Mr. Ryan), 33% less than the total target long-term annual incentive awards granted in 2018.


  Approximate Grant Date Fair Value
  2018 Annual LTI 2018 Strategic LTI 2018 Total LTI
Executive 
PRSUs(1)
 TRSUs 
PRSUs(1)
 TRSUs 
David T. Provost $600,000
 $400,000 $1,200,000
 $800,000
 $3,000,000
Dennis L. Klaeser $264,000
 $176,000  $ 336,000
 $224,000
 $1,000,000
Gary Torgow $600,000
 $400,000 $1,200,000
 $800,000
 $3,000,000
Thomas C. Shafer $450,000
 $300,000 $ 150,000
 $100,000
 $1,000,000
J. Brennan Ryan 
 $520,000 
 
 $ 520,000
(1)Amount shown is the target amount of the award. The range of PRSUs actually earned can be in the range of 0% of target for below threshold performance, to 50% of target for threshold performance, to 150% of target for maximum performance.

(2)Under Mr. Ryan’s employment agreement, on July 9, 2018, he received TRSUs with a grant date fair value of $520,000 that vest on December 15, 2019.

(3)Not calculated for Mr. Ryan, since his 2018 award was made pursuant to his employment agreement.
New Employment Agreements

On February 27, 2018, we entered into new employment agreements with David Provost, our Chief Executive Compensation?Officer and President, and Gary Torgow, our Executive Chairman, which, among other things, increased each of their base salaries from $1.00 to $950,000 effective July 1, 2018.

On July 1, 2018, we entered into new employment agreements with Thomas C. Shafer, Chief Executive Officer of Chemical Bank, and Dennis Klaeser, our Chief Financial Officer, which, among other things, provide for an annual base salary of $950,000 for Mr. Shafer and $750,000 for Mr. Klaeser.

Hiring of J. Brennan Ryan as Chief Operating Officer

We hired J. Brennan Ryan to serve as our Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice President on July 9, 2018. Under his employment agreement, for 2018, he received an annual base salary of $650,000, a guaranteed incentive payment of $520,000 in 2018, and TRSUs with a grant date fair value of $520,000 that vest on December 15, 2019.

Overview of Our Executive Compensation Program

Our executive compensation program is aligned with our growth-oriented business strategy and is designed to drive short- and medium-term performance results as well as long-term, shareholder value creation. We provide pay packages to our executives that are intended to compensate fairly, attract the best leaders in the banking industry, and engage and motivate them to deliver strong results.

The Compensation Committee considers peer group market data and the advice of its independent consultant when establishing compensation packages for executives or making decisions related to incentive plan design. We seek to create and annually calibrate an appropriate mix of cash and non-cash compensation, short and long-term incentives, and fixed and at-risk compensation to balance internal priorities with shareholder expectations, short-term results with long-term vision and stability with innovation. The Compensation Committee believes that performance expectations should be clearly articulated and directly tied to compensation outcomes. Our executive pay program consists of three major elements and a number of practices explicitly designed to promote good governance. Each component helps us attract and retain high-performing executives. In addition, these compensation elements have the objectives described below:



2018 Key Compensation Elements
ComponentObjectivePeriod
Base Salaryl
Provide a measure of income stability to allow executives to focus on the execution of our strategic goals



Annual
Annual Cash Incentivesl
Encourage, recognize and reward achievement of annual corporate financial goals and individual performance objectives

Annual
Long-term Equity Incentive Compensation
l


l

Align executive and shareholder goals by providing management with a direct interest in our future success
Reward achievement of sustained long-term performance while providing adequate exposure to equity performance risk

Long-term

Compensation Program Governance
What We DoWhat We Don't Do
üWe tie the majority of our named executive officer compensation to performanceûOur incentive programs do not encourage excessive risk taking
üOur change-in-control provisions require a double-triggerûWe prohibit hedging of our securities
üWe maintain strong stock ownership guidelines of 5x salary for our CEO, and 3x salary for our other named executive officersûOur equity plan does not allow repricing of underwater options without shareholder approval
üWe have stock holding guidelines, until minimum share ownership requirements are achievedûWe do not provide excise tax-gross ups
üWe have adopted a clawback policyûWe do not provide significant executive perquisites
üWe have appropriate caps on incentive plan payouts
üOur Compensation Committee is comprised entirely of independent directors
üOur Compensation Committee engages an independent consultant
üOur Compensation Committee regularly meets in executive session without management present
üWe perform an annual risk assessment of the compensation program

Objectives and Philosophy

Our philosophy on executive compensation is to align the interests of our executive management with the interests of our shareholders and to ensure that the total compensation paid to our executive officers is reasonable, motivating and competitive. We also recognize the need to differentiate compensation by individual, reflecting on his or her role, experience, performance, and expected contributions.



Guiding Principles
Align Executive Compensation with Shareholder ValueCreation

Within our overall compensation strategy, we use equity-based compensation to align the financial interests and objectives of our named executive officers with those of our shareholders. In addition, our annual and long-term incentive goals and payouts are designed so that target and above-target compensation levels are achieved only when our financial and relative market performance indicate that intrinsic value has been created.

Attract, Retain and Motivate High-Performing Executive Talent

We operate in a competitive employment environment and our employees, led by our named executive officers, are essential to our success. The compensation of our named executive officers, while designed to be competitive within the marketplace for similar positions with bank holding companies of comparable size, is also designed to motivate the named executive officers to maximize our performance. We believe that our high-performing executives should receive compensation that reflects their value to our organization and retains them in our service.

Link Pay to Performance

Our compensation program is designed to provide a strong correlation between the performance of the named executive officers and the compensation the named executive officers receive. We accomplish this by including compensation elements that are designed to reward our named executive officers based on our overall performance and the executives’ abilities to achieve the performance priorities established by the Committee.

Manage Risk

We employ features to mitigate against our executives taking excessive risk in order to maximize pay-outs, including varied and balanced performance targets, discretionary authority of the Committee to reduce award pay-outs, maximum caps on annual incentive payments, and an incentive compensation recoupment policy, or “clawback” policy.


2018 Say-on-Pay Vote Results

At our 2018 annual meeting of shareholders, approximately 96% of the votes cast on the Say-on-Pay proposal were in favor of approving the resolution. The Compensation Committee considers the results of this advisory resolution when evaluating and establishing our executive compensation programs. The Compensation Committee believes that these voting results reflect strong confidence in our board to exercise good judgment in structuring a thoughtful executive compensation program that benefits our shareholders. The Compensation Committee intends to continuously improve our executive compensation arrangements and programs to meet evolving business conditions, address retention concerns and ensure consistent alignment with shareholder interests.

Compensation Decision-Making Process

Role of the Compensation and Pension Committee

The Compensation Committee assists the board of directors in discharging its responsibilities relating to executive compensation and in fulfilling its responsibilities relating to our compensation and benefit programs and policies. Under the Compensation and Pension Committee Charter, the Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving total compensation, including base salary, bonus, annual cash incentive awards, long-term incentive awards, benefits and other compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and all other executive officers of the Corporation. The Committee also is also responsible for, among other things:

Annually reviewing and approving the corporate and individual goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer;

Annually reviewing and approving the compensation of our other executive officers;

Reviewing, recommending and approving the design of retirement, stock incentive, cash incentive, welfare and other compensation and benefit plans and administering such plans as approved by the board, subject to the provisions of each plan; and

Reviewing, recommending and approving employment agreements and other arrangements for executive officers.

The Committee currently consists of five directors, all of whom are independent under NASDAQ listing rules.



Role of Leadership

The Committee, along with the entire board of directors, believes that an empowered leadership team is critical to our ability to respond efficiently and successfully to important business issues. As such, the Committee has delegated limited reasonable authority for certain decisions and activities, as permitted by the Compensation Committee Charter, to the Chief Executive Officer, the Vice Chair, President and Chief Executive Officer of Chemical Financial’sBank, and other members of our executive leadership team. In that regard, the Committee has delegated to certain executive officers, by means of our Equity Grant Delegation Policy, the authority to award a limited number of TRSUs to employees who are not executive officers as defined by Rule 3b-7 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

The Committee calls upon our executive leadership team from time to time to support the Committee in the fulfillment of its duties. Executive leadership provides recommendations related to a number of matters that are subject to the Committee’s review and approval, including the compensation of executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer, the design of our incentive plans and the financial goals on which these incentive plans are based. The Committee retains absolute discretion in determining whether to approve recommendations made by our executive leadership.

Role of Compensation Consultants

From 2011 until September 2018, the Committee engaged Aon Hewitt, which we refer to as Aon, to serve as independent compensation consultant to advise the Committee on matters related to executive and director compensation. Specifically, Aon assisted the Committee in the design of the Chemical Financial Corporation Executive Annual Incentive Plan adopted in February 2018. Aon also helped the Committee select performance objectives under the plan and gave the Committee an analysis of compensation practices of peer companies so the Committee could analyze how our programs fit within industry standards.

In September 2018, the Committee concluded its relationship with Aon and engaged Pay Governance LLC to serve as independent compensation consultant. In its role, Pay Governance has consulted with the Committee and has provided information on peer group selection, market analysis for executive compensation, and has reviewed our incentive plans.

The Committee conducted a review of its relationships with Aon and Pay Governance in 2018 and determined that their work did not create any conflicts of interest. The Compensation Committee also determined that both Aon and Pay Governance are independent under the criteria included in NASDAQ listing standards.

Compensation Risk Assessment

The Committee annually evaluates our compensation programs to assess whether our programs, by design or administrative process, would facilitate or encourage excessive risk-taking by executives or other employees. In 2018, the Committee reviewed our compensation programs, including an internal risk assessment, and concluded that our compensation programs are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Corporation. With respect to our executive compensation programs alignspecifically, the Committee based its conclusion, in part, on the fact that our programs contain the following design elements:

the amounts that may be earned under annual and long-term incentive awards are limited, which diminishes the potential reward of excessive risk taking;

financial metrics for incentive awards are aligned with our financial goals and drive shareholder value creation. Thestrategic plan and are both challenging and reasonable, which motivates our executives to take appropriate, rather than risky or excessive, actions to achieve those goals; and

stock ownership guidelines require executives to have significant “skin-in-the-game,” creating a disincentive for imprudent decision-making.

Additional best practices we employ to mitigate executive compensation risk include: an anti-hedging policy, multi-year vesting of equity awards, a formal clawback policy and double-trigger change of control arrangements.

Competitive Market Analysis

Our Committee compares our executive compensation levels and programs are intended to align each executive’sa group of like peer companies with whom we compete for talent. The Committee reviews peer group market data and practices at least annually, and evaluates it as one important reference point when making decisions. The Committee meets at least once annually in executive session to review market assessments provided by its independent consultant for Mr. Torgow, Mr. Provost and Mr. Shafer. The Committee also reviews


market assessments for our other executive officers, and in conjunction with Mr. Shafer’s recommendations, makes appropriate adjustments to their compensation, as needed.

2018 Peer Group

Each year the Committee works with our performance – both inindependent compensation consultant to review compensation for executive positions within a designated peer group of companies to ensure the short-term through anoverall appropriateness and competitiveness of our compensation levels and programs, although the Committee did not benchmark the amount of 2018 compensation or otherwise target our compensation to any specific percentile or range with respect to our peer group.

Our 2018 Peer Group consisted of the following 16 companies:
BancorpSouth, Inc.Hancock Holding CompanyTFS Financial Corp
BankUnited, Inc.IBERIABANK CorporationTrustmark Corporation
F.N.B. CorporationMB Financial, Inc.UMB Financial Corporation
Flagstar Bancorp, Inc.Old National BancorpUnited Bankshares, Inc.
Fulton Financial CorporationTCF Financial CorporationValley National Bancorp
Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc.

As we evolve, we continue to revisit and refine our peer group, as needed. To select peers for 2018, we worked with Aon to consider regional banks or chartered thrifts that generally fit within the following criteria:

Assets between $10 billion and $25 billion, based on fiscal year 2017 results; and
Market capitalization of at least $500 million.
Elements of Compensation

The compensation of our named executive officers primarily consists of base salary, annual cash incentive awards and in the long-term through performance-basedannual grants of equity awards. The program isamount and mix of these elements are individually calibrated to deliver fair levelseach executive based on his or her level of responsibility and expected effect on our results. Executives also participate in our retirement plans, and may receive discretionary awards to recognize extraordinary performance as approved by the Committee. Each component of compensation is intended to attract, motivate and retain key executives.accomplish one or more of the compensation objectives discussed earlier.

Our program consists of three main components: base salary, annual bonus, and long-term incentives.Base Salary

Base Salary.Annual base salaries are calibratedestablished to provide fair and competitive levels of compensation and to attract and retain executives and senior officers with exceptional abilities and talent. The Committee determinesIn 2018, we entered into new employment agreements with each of our named executive officers. Each of these employment agreements set the officer’s base salary, subject to annual review by the Committee. When determining the base salaries by consideringunder each executive’s new employment agreement, the Committee considered a variety of factors including for each executive, including:

individual performance, skills and achievements,achievements;
level of experience and corresponding current compensation, responsibilities within the Corporation,if applicable; and
ability to contribute to our performance.

The Committee also considered current competitive practices of companies in our peer group, companies. While the Committee considersCommittee’s philosophy of paying salaries that are competitive with organizations of comparable size and complexity, and the recommendations of our Chief Executive Officer and the Vice Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Chemical Bank (for executives other than themselves). After considering all of these factors, it


ultimately determinesthe Committee determined that the employment agreement with each of Mr. Provost, Mr. Torgow, Mr. Klaeser, Mr. Shafer and Mr. Ryan provided an annual base salaries, in its judgment, based on what it considers to besalary at a level that the Committee considered reasonable, appropriate and in the best interest of the Corporation and itsour shareholders.
Annual Cash Bonus Incentives.   Annual cash bonus incentives align executive and senior officer compensation with the Corporation’s overall financial performance, and differentiate based on their individual contributions to this performance. Target incentive opportunities are set by the Committee taking into account the executives’ role and responsibilities and opportunities for similar roles at our peers. 2016 performance goals for our named executive officers (other than Mr. Klaeser, who did not participate in the Chemical Financial incentive plan in 2016) are comprised of corporate goals and individual goals, as well as department goals for Messrs. Amat and Rathbun. The 2016 weightings of these goals for each of the named executive officers were as follows:
NEOCorporateDepartmentIndividual
    
Ramaker80%20%
Gwizdala70%30%
Kohn70%30%
Amat40%40%20%
Rathbun40%40%20%

The corporate goals are what we consider to be the most prescient financial measures of the short and long-term success of our business. The corporate goals and weightings underlying the 2016 annual incentive plan were as follows:
Diluted EPS (60% of the corporate goal) which is a critical measure of the overall profitability of the Corporation;
Deposit growth (20% of the corporate goal) which provides the fuel for expanding our lending activities;
Noninterest expense (20% of the corporate goal) which directly impacts our profitability and is wholly controllable by the Corporation, in contrast to certain macroeconomic factors affecting our business.

Individual and department goals are also key indicators of performance with respect to objectives that enhance shareholder value. The results measured by these goals are more specific to the executive’s individual role or department. These goals may be either qualitative or quantitative in nature, and in the case of Messrs. Amat and Rathbun include financial objectives that are specific to their department.
Each of the corporate, department and individual goals has a payout range from 0% of the target payout for below threshold performance, to 50% of target for threshold performance, to 150% of target for maximum performance.
In addition to the corporate, department and individual goals, two overall qualifiers are applied to the annual cash bonus incentives that may reduce the payouts under certain circumstances.
First, if the Corporation’s diluted earnings per common share for the year does not equal or exceed the shareholder cash dividends paid per share for the year, the payout to the named executive officers is reduced by 50%.
Second, if the overall achievement with respect to the corporate components of the plan is not greater than 80% of target, the payout to the named executive officers that is tied to the individual performance may not exceed 100% of the target payout.

The Company achieved both of these overall qualifiers in 2016. The Committee further determined and the board of directors approved that payouts with respect to the corporate component of the plan were earned at 132.46% of target for 2016. The combination of corporate goal achievement with individual performance achievement and department achievement in the cases of Messrs. Amat and Rathbun resulted in the following annual cash incentive bonus payouts for 2016.
 Target OpportunityActual Payout
Name% of Salary$ Value% of Salary$ Value
Mr. Ramaker80%$549,809
131%$720,091
Ms. Gwizdala60%206,741
130%269,228
Mr. Amat60%185,596
130%241,248
Mr. Kohn50%164,304
130%213,964
Mr. Rathbun60%185,596
130%241,248



Long-term Incentives. A significant portionThe following table details the base annual salary of eachour named executive officer’s compensation is delivered through long-term incentive compensation.officers under their employment agreements as in effect for the periods presented. See “Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards under Chemical Financial’s long-term equity-based compensation plan are designed to:Table -

closely align executive officer and shareholder interests;
reward officersSummary Compensation Table” below for building shareholder value;
rewardthe actual salary paid to each of our named executive officers for the achievement of targeted financial2017 and other performance goals; and2018 fiscal years.
encourage long-term investment in the Corporation by participating officers.

To achieve these goals, we use three types of long-term incentive equity compensation:
Named Executive Officer Year-End 2017 Base Annual Salary 2018 Base Annual Salary through June 30, 2018 2018 Base Annual Salary beginning July 1, 2018
David T. Provost 
$1.00(1)
 $1.00 
$950,000(3) 
Dennis L. Klaeser $550,000 $550,000 
$750,000(3)
Gary Torgow 
$1.00(1)
 $1.00 
$950,000(3)
Thomas C. Shafer 
$750,000(1)
 $750,000 
$950,000(3)
J. Brennan Ryan 
--(2)
 
--(2)
 
$650,000(3)
1.(1)Restricted stock performance units (60% of the total awardRepresents salary provided for under his Employment Agreement entered into in 2016) reward executives for the achievement of key financial goals. These goals for the performance period beginning in 2014 and ending in 2016 were diluted EPS (weighted 65%) and efficiency ratio (weighted 35%).September 2017.

2.(2)Restricted stock service-based units (10% of the total award in 2016) encourage executive retention and vest in their entirety five years from the date of grant.We hired Mr. Ryan on July 9, 2018.

3.(3)Stock options (30% of the total awardRepresents salary provided for under his Employment Agreement entered into in 2016) align executive and shareholder interests by providing an incentive for long-term shareholder value creation. They also encourage executive retention and vest over a five year period beginning one year from the date of grant.2018.

In determining
Annual Cash Incentive Plan

We provide an annual cash-based incentive plan in which our executive officers participate because we believe it is a critical tool for:

holding executive leadership accountable for the financial results of the organization;
rewarding and reinforcing the behaviors and achievements that produce positive financial results; and
hiring and retaining the best executive talent in the banking industry.

On February 27, 2018, based on the recommendation of the Committee, our board of directors approved the Chemical Financial Corporation Executive Annual Incentive Plan, which we refer to as the annual incentive plan. Under the annual incentive plan, each year, the Committee selects eligible executives who will participate in the plan and sets the amount of long-termeach participant’s threshold, target and maximum award that can be awarded under the annual incentive compensation to be delivered to each executive, the Committee establishes a target for each named executive officer equal toplan, determined as a percentage of his or herthe participant’s base salary. The number of shares granted is determined by dividing this total award opportunity byCommittee also establishes one or more performance measures and a formula to determine the established mixamount of the three award vehicles, and then converting the dollar amount into a numberthat will be earned at different levels of shares utilizing the fair valueachievement of the awards onperformance measures. For 2018, the dateCommittee set the potential incentive payment, expressed as a percentage of grant.base salary, as follows.
lti.jpg
Name Threshold (%) 

Threshold
Incentive Payment
($)(1)
 


Target
(%)
 
Target
Incentive Payment
($)(1)
 Maximum (%) 

Maximum
Incentive Payment ($)(1)
David T. Provost 50% $475,000 100% $950,000 150% $1,425,000
Dennis L. Klaeser 40% $300,000 80% $600,000 140% $900,000
Gary Torgow 50% $475,000 100% $950,000 150% $1,425,000
Thomas C. Shafer 50% $475,000 100% $950,000 150% $1,425,000
(1)Potential incentive payments are based on each executive’s December 31, 2018 base salary, as the Committee determined that each executive would receive the benefit, on a relative basis, for increases in base salary that occurred after the potential incentive payments were determined in February 2018.

Mr. Ryan was hired in July 2018 and therefore did not participate in the annual incentive plan. Under his employment agreement, he was entitled to a guaranteed incentive payment of $520,000 in 2018.



Retention Restricted Stock Unit Awards. 2018 Performance Metrics

Under the annual incentive plan, the Committee is responsible for establishing the corporate and individual performance measures that, when compared to actual results, determine the amount of payout that is earned with respect to the plan. In accordancesetting these goals, the Committee considers a number of factors, including our annual budget, our short- and long-term business strategy, investor performance expectations, and guidance provided by our executive leadership team. In the first quarter of 2018, the Committee determined that the performance measures under the annual incentive plan for each named executive officer would consist of corporate financial metrics weighted at 80% and individual performance metrics weighted at 20%.

The 2018 corporate financial metrics, weighted at 80%, were (a) adjusted core net income, and (b) adjusted efficiency ratio. The Committee believes these metrics reflect the most reliable, comprehensive financial indicators of our performance relative to our key 2018 strategic priorities of increasing profitable loan growth and improving our operating efficiency.

The target corporate financial goals were set at challenging levels representing significant growth and improvement over 2017, and generally corresponded to or exceeded our budgeted financial plan. In 2018, adjusted core net income replaced earnings per share as the core financial metric underlying the annual incentive plan to avoid overlap with our PRSUs granted under our long-term incentive plan.

The Committee established threshold, target and maximum performance goals for each of the two corporate financial metrics for 2018, with threshold representing the minimum level of performance for which the executive officer will earn a payment. If performance is below the threshold level for one of the corporate financial metrics, the executive officer will not earn a payment for that metric; however, the executive officer will earn a payment for the other metric if the threshold performance level is achieved. Maximum represents the maximum level of performance required to achieve the maximum (150%) payment on each of the metrics. If performance exceeds the maximum level for any corporate or individual performance metric, the executive officer will not earn a further incentive above the maximum incentive for such metric. Payments for achievement of the threshold, target and maximum goals are 50%, 100% and 150% of the target payment, respectively. Actual performance between threshold, target and maximum performance levels is interpolated linearly to determine the exact level of achievement.

The individual performance metrics, weighted at 20%, that the Committee considered were based on non-formulaic objectives, such as the implementation of actions to achieve revenue growth and profitability by attracting new customers, improving practices related to risk management, identifying potential merger and acquisition targets, engaging in leadership development, and continuing to build the Chemical brand and culture.

2018 Annual Incentive Payments

In February 2019, the Committee determined that we achieved the corporate metrics at the level detailed in the following table.

   
2018 Corporate Goal Levels
(% payout opportunities)
 2018 Actual Performance  
 Assigned Weight 
Threshold
(50%)
 
Target
(100%)
 
Maximum
(150%)
 $ % 
Weighted Average Achievement(1)
Adjusted Core Net Income(1)
80% $258.7M $272.3M $277.7M $276.9 142.9% 114.3%
Adjusted Efficiency Ratio(2)
20% 55% 52% 49% 52.0% 100.0% 20.0%
Total100%       134.3%
(1)Adjusted Core Net Income under our annual incentive plan is our reported net income, excluding (a) the benefit of lower than anticipated expenses related to our core operating system conversion and the change in timing of realizing executive officer incentive expense related to our Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, (b) the change in fair value of loan servicing rights, and (c) certain unanticipated benefits to our income tax expense provision.

(2)Adjusted Efficiency Ratio under our annual incentive plan is our total operating expenses, excluding (a) the impairment of income tax credits, (b) amortization of intangibles, and (c) the excluded items described in footnote (1) above, divided by the sum of (i) net interest income, excluding the net interest income fully-tax equivalent adjustment, and (ii) noninterest income, excluding the change in fair value of loan servicing rights and gain on sales of investment securities.

In addition, the Committee determined that each executive achieved his individual performance metrics at 100% of target. These performance outcomes resulted in potential incentive payments equal to 127.5% of the target incentive payment, as set forth in


the table below. While adjusted core net income and the adjusted core efficiency ratio were the chosen corporate metrics used by the Committee in determining awards under the annual incentive plan, the Committee also determined, in its exercise of negative discretion, to consider our total shareholder return. Although our total shareholder return over the preceding 5-year period was higher than the KBW NASDAQ Regional Banking Index, the stock market decline in the fourth quarter of 2018 resulted in decline in our share value at year-end. Accordingly, the Committee exercised its discretion to decrease overall incentive payments as a result of its review of our total shareholder return for 2018. As a result, the Committee determined to fund Mr. Klaeser’s and Mr. Shafer’s incentive payments at 102% of target. In addition, with respect to Mr. Provost and Mr. Torgow, as noted above, the Committee re-evaluated their terms, all unvested Chemical Financialparticipation in the annual incentive plan and determined that to more closely align their interests with those of our shareholders and to increase the retention effect of their compensation packages, the Committee would exercise its discretion not to award Mr. Provost and Mr. Torgow any cash incentives under the annual incentive plan for 2018. Instead, the Committee determined to grant to each of Mr. Provost and Mr. Torgow a supplemental equity award in February 2019 with a grant date fair value equal to approximately $950,000, which approximates the target amount Mr. Provost and Mr. Torgow would have been eligible to receive under the annual incentive plan despite corporate and individual performance earned at 127.5% of target in 2018. This supplemental equity grant consists of time-vesting restricted stock units, (RSUs) granted before 2016or TRSUs, that vest in equal annual installments over a three-year period, in each case subject to continued service through the vesting date, subject to certain exceptions.

The following table reflects amounts earned and actually paid under the annual incentive plan to those named executive officers who participated in, and received payments under, the annual incentive plan in 2018.

      Performance Metrics        
  Target Incentive Corporate Individual Potential Payout    
Named Executive Officer % of Salary Value Result Weight Result Weight % of Target Value Negative Discretion Actual Payout
Dennis L. Klaeser 80% $600,000 134.3% 80% 100% 20% 127.5% $764,736 $(152,736) $612,000
Thomas C. Shafer 100% $950,000 134.3% 80% 100% 20% 127.5% $1,210,832 $(241,832) $969,000

Other 2018 Cash Bonus Payment

Under Mr. Ryan’s employment agreement, he received a guaranteed incentive payment of $520,000 in 2018.


Long-Term Equity Compensation

We deliver a significant portion of our executive officer compensation through long-term equity grants that are specifically designed to:

ensure that executives have material “skin in the game,” thereby aligning executive and shareholder interests;
reward executives for building long-term, sustainable shareholder value; and
complement our annual cash incentive plan to appropriately balance executive focus on both short- and long-term objectives.

In 2018, awards were scheduledprovided under the 2017 Stock Plan, which our shareholders approved at the 2017 annual meeting.



Annual Long-Term Incentive Awards - February 2018

In February 2018, we continued our long-standing practice of awarding our annual long-term equity grants to fully vest upon completionour named executive officers. In setting the amount of equity awards in 2018, the Talmer merger, entitling holdersCommittee considered a variety of RSUs to receive one sharefactors, including the terms of Chemical Financial common stock for each RSU awarded. Prior to completionexecutive officer’s employment agreement, peer group data and the Committee’s assessment of individual retention risk. In 2018, the Talmer merger, certain holders of RSUs received additional RSUsCommittee established annual long-term incentive awards with grant date fair values equal to 25%between 80% and 105% of the holder’s outstanding unvested RSUs, which modified their existing unvested RSUs to forego immediate vesting and, instead, kept unvested RSUs subject to the existing performance-based or time-based vesting schedules. In addition, the additional RSUs provide, and the existing unvested RSUs were modified to provide, that upon a changeeach executive’s base salary in control of the Corporation, accelerated vesting occurs only upon a qualifying termination of employment post-change in control. Mr. Klaeser did not participate as he was not a Chemical Financial employeeeffect at the time of the offer. Mr. Ramaker elected to preserveaward, as indicated in the original performance-based or time-based vesting requirements of his RSUs, but chose to forgotable below. The actual value that the additional 25% retention award. The remaining named executive officers wererealize from these 2018 long-term equity awards may differ from the grant date fair value of such awards due to share price appreciation or depreciation and the level at which the PRSU component of the long-term equity awards is earned. The 2018 annual long-term equity incentive awards granted the additional RSUs shownto our named executive officers in the following table in August, 2016.February consisted of 60% PRSUs and 40% TRSUs, as described below under “Components of Annual Long-term and Strategic Awards.”

Name Retention Shares In $
Mr. Ramaker 0 $0
Mr. Amat 1,781  82,336
Ms. Gwizdala 3,976  183,810
Mr. Kohn 4,132  191,022
Mr. Rathbun 1,246  57,603
Name Base Salary on Grant Date Long-Term Incentive Award as a Percent of Base Salary Approximate Grant Date Fair Value of Award
David T. Provost(1)
 $950,000 105% $1,000,000
Dennis L. Klaeser $550,000 80% $440,000
Gary Torgow(1)
 $950,000 105% $1,000,000
Thomas C. Shafer $750,000 100% $750,000
J. Brennan Ryan(2)
   
(1)At the time of the grant, the award for each of Mr. Provost and Mr. Torgow was based on his $950,000 base salary that was approved in February 2018 to become effective in July 2018.

(2)Mr. Ryan was not hired until July 2018.

Strategic Awards - February 2018

2014In addition to the annual long-term incentive awards, the Committee granted a special strategic award in 2018. In granting the strategic award, the Committee looked at a number of factors, including each executive’s (a) evolving roles and additional responsibilities, (b) unique ability to drive business to our bank, (c) ability to build strategic partnerships that advance our key business objectives, and their involvement and visibility within our communities that elevates both our visibility and standing. In light of these factors, the Committee considered the unvested equity position of each executive in Chemical and the potential for disruption to our business as well as the impact on shareholder value should any of our named executive officers leave, particularly Mr. Provost and Mr. Torgow, and determined that it was in the best interests of Chemical and our shareholders to grant additional equity awards. The strategic awards are not intended to be an ongoing component of our named executive officer annual compensation and the 2019 target long-term annual incentive awards approved by the Committee in February 2019 (to be disclosed in next year’s proxy statement) were, on average (excluding Mr. Ryan), 33% less than the total target long-term annual incentive awards granted in 2018. The 2018 strategic awards granted to our named executive officers in February consisted of 60% PRSUs and 40% TRSUs, as described below under “Components of Annual Long-term and Strategic Awards.”

Components of Annual Long-Term and Strategic Awards

Both the 2018 annual long-term equity incentive awards and the strategic awards granted to our named executive officers in February 2018 consisted of 60% PRSUs and 40% TRSUs. The TRSUs vest in equal 20% increments on each of the first five anniversaries of the February 27, 2018 grant date. The PRSUs are subject to conditional vesting based on the attainment of pre-established corporate performance metrics and continued service through 2016 Restricted Stock Performance Unit Cycle Payout
For the 2014 through 2016date our audit opinion is issued at the end of the three-year performance period payouts of restricted stockJanuary 1, 2018 through December 31, 2020. The corporate performance unitsmetrics for the PRSUs awarded in February 2018 are cumulative earnings per share, weighted at 75%, and relative total shareholder return, weighted at 25%. The Committee established threshold, target and maximum performance levels for each selected goal. Payments for achievement of the threshold, target and maximum goals are 50%, 100% and 150% of the target payment, respectively. Actual performance between threshold, target and maximum performance levels will be interpolated to determine the amount of payment based on relative achievement of the corporate performance metrics. See “Overview of Key Events and Named Executive Officer Compensation for 2018” for a table that describes the grant date fair value of both the annual long-term and strategic awards.



Long-Term Incentive Grant - July 2018

Under the terms of his employment agreement, on July 9, 2018, upon joining the Corporation, Mr. Ryan received an initial equity award valued at $520,000 in the form of TRSUs that will vest in full on December 15, 2019, subject to continued service through the vesting date.

January 4, 2017 PRSU Payouts

The performance period for the January 4, 2017 PRSUs granted to Mr. Klaeser and Mr. Shafer concluded in 2018. The performance metrics to which these PRSUs were dependent on performance relative to two goals:subject were adjusted diluted earnings per share, (weighted 65%)weighted 75%, and adjusted efficiency ratio, (weighted 35%)weighted 25%. GoalsSimilar to the 2018 PRSU grant, performance for the 2014 through 2016 cycle performance period were set at the beginningeach of the performance period and represent 29% growth in diluted EPS and 6.5% improvement in the efficiency ratio over the performance period.
Each of thethese goals is subject to a payout rangewas measured on an interpolated scale ranging from 0% of target for below threshold performance, to 50% of target for threshold performance, to 100% of target for target performance to 150% of target for maximum performance. The Compensation Committee further determined and the Board of Directors approved that payouts with respect to the performance measurementgoals were earned at 150%90.0% of target for the 2014 through 2016 cycle.
The payout of the 2014 through 2016 performance restricted stock units will occur in March 2017 with the named executive officers receiving the following payouts based on the payout at 150% of target and an 84% increase in stock price over the performance period.
  
Target Opportunity
($29.45 stock price)
 
Total Payout
($54.17 stock price)
Name Shares In $ 
% of
Target
 Shares In $
Mr. Ramaker 11,602 $341,679 150% 17,403 $942,721
Ms. Gwizdala 4,250  125,163 150% 6,375  345,344
Mr. Kohn 4,417  130,081 150% 6,626  358,903
Mr. Amat 1,462  43,056 150% 2,193  118,795
Mr. Rathbun 944  27,801 150% 1,416  76,705

Merger Completion Awards.   To recognize the substantial contributions of our executives towards the successful completion of the Talmer merger, the Board of Directors approved discretionary recognition awards to the named executive officers, paidperiod, as indicated in the form of shares of common stock. The value of the discretionary awards granted to the named executive officers was as follows: Mr. Ramaker – $0; Mr. Klaeser – $75,000; Ms. Gwizdala – $75,000; Messrs. Amat and Rathbun – $70,000; and Mr. Kohn – $50,000. Mr. Ramaker did not receive an award under this program.



2016 Say-on-Pay Resultstable below.

The Corporation provides its shareholders with the opportunity to cast an annual advisory vote on executive compensation (Say-on-Pay proposal). At the Corporation’s annual meetingcalculation of shareholders held in April 2016, a 94% of the votes cast on the Say-on-Pay proposal at2018 financial achievement includes certain non-GAAP adjustments that meeting were voted to approve the Corporation’s executive compensation for 2015. The Committee believes this affirms shareholders’ support of the Corporation’s approach to executive compensation. In light of the voting results, the Committee did not materially change its approach to executive compensation in 2016. The Committee will continue to consider the outcome of advisory votes on the Corporation’s Say-on-Pay proposals when making future compensation decisions for the named executive officers.

Corporate Governance Highlights

Our executive compensation programs feature a number of leading compensation governance practices:

A separate Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and additionally, a Lead Independent Director;
Significant stock ownership guidelines, which were increased in for 2017 to require the CEO to retain 5 times his salary in common stock and the other named executive officer’s to retain 3 times their salary in common stock;
Holding requirements were also added in 2017 requiring executives to retain 50% of the net shares they receive from equity awards until they reach stock ownership guidelines;
Maximum payout opportunities for annual and long-term incentives;
Qualifiers that limit annual incentive pay if not achieved;
Peer group comparison of executive pay;
Limited perquisites;
Double-trigger change in control provisions;
Independent compensation consultant;
A clawback policy;
No repricing of stock options without shareholder approval; and
No gross-ups of change in control payments.

Executive Compensation Actions Relating to the Merger with Talmer Bancorp, Inc.
In connection with the merger with Talmer Bancorp, Inc. (Talmer), the Committee and the board of directors determined that a number of actions with respect to Chemical Financial’s executive compensation program were appropriate. A summary of these actions follows.
Executive Employment Agreements. Chemical Financial historically has not used executive employment agreements as part of its executive compensation program. However, in connection with the Talmer merger, the Committee and the board of directors determined that entering into executive employment agreements with select executive officers was appropriate and in the best interests of the Corporation has in prior years regularly and its shareholders. In making this determination, the Committee and the board considered, among other factors:
the perceived benefitscustomarily made to the Corporation of ensuring the retention and hiring of a highly qualified executive management team to lead the Corporation post-merger;
the perceived benefits to the Corporation of having clearly defined terms and conditions of employment with members of the executive management team, including terms and conditions relating to the protection of the Corporation’s confidential information and obligations of the executive officer not to compete with, and not to solicit customers or employees of, Chemical Financial during and for a period of time following employment with the Corporation;
the perceived benefits to the Corporation and the executive officer of providing the executive officer with certain severance benefits following a termination of employment, including in the event of a change in control of the Corporation, such as providing the executive officer with a competitive compensation package relative to peers, retention of the executive officer, generally, and incentivizing the executive officer to maximize shareholder value by remaining with the Corporation during the process of a potential change in control transaction and to assure the effective and orderly completion of a change in control transaction;


negotiations and discussions with the Talmer board of directors and management during the merger process that entering into executive employment agreements with select executive officers would occur in connection with completion of the merger; and
the practices of peers and analyses of Aon Hewitt as discussed further below.
In determining the terms and conditions of the executive employment agreements, the Committee engaged Aon Hewitt, an independent compensation consultant, to provide the Committee with independent and objective analyses of the compensation practices of a select group of peer companies with a total asset size of between $10 billion and $30 billion. The selected peer companies were:
Astoria Financial CorporationMB Financial Inc.TFS Financial Corp.
BancorpSouth, Inc.Old National BancorpTrustmark Corporation
BankUnited, Inc.PacWest BancorpUMB Financial Corporation
F.N.B. CorporationPrivateBancorp, Inc.United Bankshares Inc.
Fulton Financial CorporationTexas Capital BancShares, Inc.Valley National Bancorp
IberiaBank Corp.

Specifically, the Committee instructed Aon Hewitt to perform peer group comparison analyses relating to the following compensation metrics:
base salary
target annual cash incentive compensation
target total cash compensation
target long-term equity incentive compensation
target total compensation
severance and change in control multiplier
After considering the Aon Hewitt analyses, the Committee determined to:
model target total compensation in accordance with entry level into the peer group; and
in determining severance benefits under certain circumstances, including a change in control, use a multiplier for Messrs. Ramaker and Klaeser and Ms. Gwizdala of times two, and a multiplier of times one for the remaining executive officers, of current base salary plus the three-year average cash bonus.
Effective as of the effective time of the Talmer merger, the Corporation entered into executive employment agreements with David B. Ramaker, Chief Executive Officer and President, Dennis L. Klaeser, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Lori A. Gwizdala, Executive Vice President Special Projects, Leonardo Amat, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer – Business Operations, Robert S. Rathbun, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer – Customer Experience, Thomas C. Shafer, Executive Vice President and Director of Regional and Community Banking, Daniel W. Terpsma, Executive Vice President of Commercial Lending and James E. Tomczyk, Executive Vice President and Senior Credit Officer. A description of the material terms of each named executive officer’s executive employment agreement may be found under the heading “Narrative to Summary Compensation Table and Equity-Based Awards and Values Tables” below, which description is here incorporated by reference.


Services Agreements. As required under the terms of the merger agreement governing the Talmer merger, the Corporation entered into a services agreement with Gary Torgow, former Chairman of Talmer, and appointed Mr. Torgow a director and Chairman of Chemical Financial, and entered into a services agreement with David T. Provost, former Chief Executive Officer and President of Talmer, and appointed Mr. Provost a director and Vice-Chairman of Chemical Financial, which services agreements and appointments became effective as of the effective time of the Talmer merger. In addition to services relating to their roles as a director and Chairman and Vice-Chairman of Chemical Financial, respectively, the services agreements require each of Messrs. Torgow and Provost to provide services as requested by Chemical Financial’s board of directors and Chief Executive Officer to assist in the integration of Talmer with Chemical Financial. These services are focused on maximizing the benefits of the Talmer merger to Chemical Financial shareholders and achieving a successful integration of the companies, the magnitude of which is significant to Chemical Financial, and have included and will continue to include, among others, facilitating the transition and retention of customers and employees, business and customer development, investor relations, service on select transition committees and community relations. A description of the material terms of the services agreements follows:
Mr. Torgow’s services agreement has a term of 24 months beginning on the effective date of the Talmer merger. Under the agreement, he will receive an annual salary of $1.0 million, which may not be adjusted downward during the term. He will also be eligible for a $600 per month car allowance, as well as a membership in a country club of his choice. Under the agreement, if Chemical Financial terminates his employment with or without cause during the term, Chemical Financial will continue to pay Mr. Torgow his annual salary through the end of the term. Under the services agreement, Mr. Torgow agreed to waive his change in control payment under his former Talmer employment agreement that would have been owing as a result of the Talmer merger. Mr. Torgow’s services agreement with Chemical Financial does not contain change in control provisions or protections. The services agreement further provides that Mr. Torgow is not expected to be eligible for Chemical Financial’s annual cashits incentive plan or long term equity incentive plan or any other bonus or incentive planfinancial results, including the exclusion of Chemical Financial or any stock options, restricted stock units or other equity awards under any Chemical Financial equity plan. Mr. Torgow’s services agreement also contains provisions related to non-competition and non-solicitation that generally preclude Mr. Torgow, for a period of 18 months following the termination of the agreement, from engaging, directly or indirectly, in the operation of a bank in Michigan or any other state in which Chemical Financial or one of its subsidiaries operated a bank during the term of his agreement, or from diverting from Chemical Financial any trade or business with any customer or supplier with whom Mr. Torgow had contact during his employment, subject to certain conditions and exceptions.
The terms of Mr. Provost’s agreement are substantially similar to those described above for Mr. Torgow.

Retention Restricted Stock Unit Awards. In accordance with their terms, all unvested RSUs granted before 2016 were scheduled to fully vest upon completion of the Talmer merger, entitling holders of RSUs to receive one share of Chemical Financial common stock for each RSU awarded. Prior to completion of the Talmer merger, certain holders of RSUs received additional RSUs equal to 25% of the holder’s outstanding unvested RSUs, which modified their existing unvested RSUs to forego immediate vesting and, instead, kept unvested RSUs subject to the existing performance-based or time-based vesting schedules. In addition, the additional RSUs provide, and the existing unvested RSUs were modified to provide, that upon a change in control of the Corporation, accelerated vesting occurs only upon a qualifying termination of employment post-change in control. Mr. Klaeser did not participate as he was not a Chemical Financial employee. Mr. Ramaker agreed to keep unvested RSUs subject to the existing performance-based or time-based vesting schedules but chose to forgo the additional 25% of unvested RSUs. As a result, in 2016 the Corporation issued 33,622 additional RSUs, including 11,135 RSUs in the aggregate to the named executive officers.

Amendments to Compensation Plans and Deferral of Accelerated Benefits. Effective as of the effective time of the Talmer merger, the Committee and the board of directors adopted amendments to the Chemical Financial Corporation Stock Incentive Plan of 2012 (the “2012 Stock Plan”), the Chemical Financial Corporation Stock Incentive Plan of 2015 (the “2015 Stock Plan”), the Chemical Financial Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”), the Chemical Financial Corporation Directors’ Deferred Stock Plan (the “Directors’ Deferred Stock Plan”) and the Chemical Financial Corporation Supplemental Retirement Plan (the “SERP”). A description of the amendments to the plans follows:
2012 Stock Plan and 2015 Stock Plan – The amendment to these plans (i) revised the default definition of a change in control in the plan to conform to the definition of a change in control that the Compensation Committee utilized for the restricted stock unit awards made in February of 2016, and (ii) added a provision that allows, but does not require, Chemical Financial to delay a payment under the plan that Chemical Financial reasonably anticipates would not be deductible under Section 162(m) of the Code.
Deferred Compensation Plan – The amendment to this plan (i) revised the default definition of a change in control in the plan to conform to the definition of a change in control that the Compensation Committee utilized for the restricted stock unit awards made in February of 2016, (ii) added a provision that allows, but does not require, Chemical Financial to delay a payment under the plan that Chemical reasonably anticipates would not be deductible under Section 162(m) of the Code, (iii) allows deferrals from bonus compensation beginning in 2017, (iv) increased the deferral limit under


the plan from 75% of compensation to 85% of compensation, (v) clarified the treatment of the plan accounts related to payments due upon a change in control, and (vi) allows the participants to elect a subsequent deferral of payments due upon a change in control.
Directors’ Deferred Stock Plan – The amendment to this plan (i) clarified the eligibility of Chemical Financial and Chemical Bank directors to participate in the plan, (ii) clarified the treatment of the plan accounts related to payments due upon a change in control, and (iii) revised the default definition of a change in control in the plan to conform to the definition of a change in control that the Compensation Committee utilized for the restricted stock unit awards made in February of 2016.
SERP – The amendment to this plan (i) clarified the calculation of future benefits based on the impact of amounts payable upon a change in control, (ii) revised the default definition of a change in control in the plan to conform to the definition of a change in control that the Compensation Committee utilized for the restricted stock unit awards made in February of 2016, and (iii) added a provision that allows, but does not require, Chemical Financial to delay a payment under the plan that Chemical Financial reasonably anticipates would not be deductible under Section 162(m) of the Code.
As a result of the Talmer merger, a change in control of Chemical Financial occurred under the plans, which caused all outstanding and unvested equity awards under the 2012 Stock Plan and the 2015 Stock Plan to become fully vested (subject to the modifications of RSUs described above), all deferred compensation under the Deferred Compensation Plan to become payable in a lump-sum payment, all deferred compensation under the Director’s Deferred Stock Plan to become payable in a lump-sum payment and the benefit owing Mr. Ramaker under the SERP to become payable in a lump-sum payment.
Pursuant to the amendments described above, the Committee and the board of directors determined to delay payment of the amounts owing under the Deferred Compensation Plan and the SERP to Mr. Ramaker on the basis that such payments would not be deductible under Section 162(m) of the Code, with such payments to be made to Mr. Ramaker during the period beginning with the date of Mr. Ramaker’s separation from service and ending on the later of the last day of the taxable year in which Mr. Ramaker separates from service or the 15th day of the third month following Mr. Ramaker’s separation from service.
Modifications to Target Annual Cash Bonus Incentives. In reward for the extensive additional efforts required to complete the Talmer merger, the Committee and the board of directors determined to increase the target annual cash bonus incentive (as discussed below) for the named executive officers (other than Mr. Klaeser, who continued to participate in the Talmer annual bonus plan for 2016) as follows: Mr. Ramaker: 70% to 80% of base salary; and Ms. Gwizdala and Messrs. Amat and Rathbun: 50% to 60% of base salary. Mr. Kohn’s target annual cash bonus incentive was not increased.
2016 Executive Compensation – In General
Compensation Philosophy and Objectives.   In 2016, the Committee continued its efforts to effectively align executive compensation with long-term shareholder return, while paying competitive base salaries and minimizing risks to the Corporation. The Committee believes that certain components of executive compensation should be based, in part, on financial returns of the Corporation and how the Corporation’s long-term shareholder returns compare with benchmarked peer companies and the overall banking industry. The peer companies were as follows (note that this peer group is different than the peer group identified above, which was considered in determining executive compensation post-Talmer merger under the executive employment agreements):
1st Source Corp.First Midwest BancorpOld National Bancorp
Bank of the OzarksGreat Southern BancorpPark National Corporation
Community Trust BancorpHeartland FinancialPinnacle Financial Partners
First CommonwealthHome BancsharesS&T Bancorp
First Financial BancorpMB FinancialUnited Bankshares, Inc.
First Merchants Corp.National Penn BancsharesWesBanco, Inc.
To that end, the Committee reviewed base salaries to assess their reasonableness as compared to salaries paid by benchmarked peers; continued annual bonus awards for executives based upon achievement of specific corporate goals, individual goals and, in certain cases, department goals with greater weight placed on corporate and department goals; and continued long-term incentives in the form of restricted stock performance units, stock options and restricted stock service-based units. The Committee continued to emphasize weighing the long-term incentive compensation for the Corporation’s named executive officers heavily to performance-based awards consisting of restricted stock performance units and stock options. Assuming all targets are met, performance-based awards would constitute 90% of long-term incentive compensation for the named executive officers.


Correspondingly, restricted stock service-based awards would represent 10% of long-term incentive compensation if all targets are met.
The Committee has considered the potential risks arising from the Corporation’s compensation policies and practices for all employees and does not believe the risks from those compensation policies and practices are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Corporation.
In summary, the Committee believes that the Corporation’s total compensation program drives the appropriate behaviors in management, is competitive in the marketplace and fairly distributes the earnings of the Corporation to the shareholders and to the employees.
Elements of Compensation
Chemical Financial’s executive compensation program has consisted primarily of the following elements: (i) base salary and benefits; (ii) annual cash bonus incentives; (iii) long-term equity-based incentives in the form of restricted stock performance units, stock options and restricted stock service-based units; (iv) participation in the Corporation’s retirement plans; and (v) discretionary awards as approved by the board of directors. Each component of compensation is intended to accomplish one or more of the compensation objectives discussed above.
Base Salary.  To attract and retain executive and senior officers with exceptional abilities and talent, annual base salaries are set to provide competitive levels of compensation. The Committee determines base salaries by considering a variety of factors, including individual performance and achievements, current compensation, responsibilities within the Corporation, and current compensation practices of other peer group companies. While the Committee considers all of these factors, it ultimately determines annual base salaries, in its judgment, based on what it considers to be reasonable and appropriate for the Company.
Annual Cash Bonus Incentives.  Annual cash bonus incentives are used to reward executive and senior officers for the Corporation’s overall financial performance, taking into consideration individual performance.
The Corporation uses a formula approach for awarding annual incentive cash bonuses to named executive officers. For each named executive officer (other than Mr. Klaeser, who continued to participate in the Talmer annual bonus plan for 2016) the Committee set a bonus target as a percentage of base salary. For 2016, the bonus targets as a percentage of base salary for each of the named executive officers (other than Mr. Klaeser) were as follows: Mr. Ramaker – 70%; and Ms. Gwizdala and Messrs. Amat, Kohn and Rathbun – 50%. The Committee may change the bonus targets each year. Actual payout may vary from 0% of target to 150% of target depending on actual performance. The discussion above under the under the heading “Modifications to Target Annual Cash Bonus Incentives” is here incorporated by reference.
After determining the bonus target for each named executive officer, the Committee then weighted the amount of the bonus between achievement of financial performance goals by the Corporation, achievement of individual goals and, in the case of Messrs. Amat and Rathbun, the achievement of department performance goals. For named executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Executive Officer recommends the individual goals to the Committee. The Committee reviews, modifies, and approves the recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer. The Committee determines the individual goals for the Chief Executive Officer.
For 2016, the weighting for each of the named executive officers (other than Mr. Klaeser) was as follows: Mr. Ramaker - 80% (financial performance goals), 20% (individual goals); Ms. Gwizdala and Mr. Kohn – 70% (financial performance goals), 30% (individual goals); and Messrs. Amat and Rathbun – 40% (financial performance goals), 40% (department performance goals), 20% (individual goals). The Committee, at its own discretion, may change the weighting between financial performance goals and individual goals each year.
The Committee further weighted the bonus amount for achievement of financial performance goals by the Corporation in 2016. The specific goals and weighting were as follows: diluted earnings per common share (60%), organic customer deposit growth (20%) and amount of actual expenses compared to budget (20%). The Committee, at its own discretion, may change the specific goals and weightings each year.
If all of the Corporation’s financial performance goals and department goals, as applicable, are met and a named executive officer meets all of his or her individual goals, then the named executive officer is paid the full amount of his or her bonus target, subject to the overall qualifiers discussed below. If some, but not all, of the Corporation’s financial performance goals, department goals, as applicable, or individual goals are met and subject to the overall qualifiers discussed below, then the named executive officer’s bonus amount is reduced by the weighting given each goal that was not met. The Corporation’s financial performance goals, department goals, as applicable, and individual performance goals can be met from 0% to 150% of the target. If none of the


Corporation’s financial performance goals, department goals, as applicable, or individual goals are met, then the named executive officer is not paid a bonus.
The Committee uses overall qualifiers to the annual cash bonus incentives. If the Corporation’s diluted earnings per common share in 2016 does not equal or exceed the shareholder cash dividends paid per share in 2016, the payout to the named executive officers is reduced by 50%. 2016 diluted earnings per common share were $2.17 and 2016 shareholder cash dividends paid were $1.06 per share. In addition, if the overall achievement of the Corporation’s financial performance goals is not greater than 80%, the payout to the named executive officers based on individual goals is limited to a 100% payout.
The annual cash bonus incentive program awards that were earned in 2016 were paid in February 2017 to the named executive officers were based on the Corporation exceeding its financial performance goals in 2016, on an overall basis, each named executive officer achieving or exceeding his or her individual performance goals and, in the case of Messrs. Amat and Rathbun, achieving or exceeding department goals. Annual cash bonus incentives are included in the Summary Compensation Table in the column “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation.”
Long-Term Equity-Based Incentives.    A portion of potential compensation is also linked to corporate performance through equity-based compensation awards, including restricted stock performance units, stock options and restricted stock service-based units. Other forms of equity-based compensation may be awarded by the Committee. Awards under Chemical Financial’s equity-based compensation plan are designed to:
more closely align executive officer and shareholder interests;
reward officers for building shareholder value;
reward officers for the achievement of targeted financial and other performance goals; and
encourage long-term investment in the Corporation by participating officers.
The Committee believes that stock ownership by management has been demonstrated to be beneficial to shareholders, and equity-based awards have been granted by Chemical Financial to executive officers pursuant to various plans for many years. The Committee administers all aspects of the Corporation’s incentive compensation plans and also has authority to determine the individuals to whom, and the terms upon which, equity-based compensation awards are granted.
The Committee believes that the number of equity-based awards that have been historically granted is consistent with the interests of shareholders and good corporate governance practices, based, in part, on the Corporation’s historical burn rate. The burn rate is a measure of the rate at which companies use shares available for grant in their equity compensation plans and is an important factor for investors concerned about shareholder dilution. Burn rate is defined as the gross number of equity awards granted during a calendar year divided by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the year. The Corporation has counted full-value awards, which do not include stock options, as 3.0 shares of common stock when calculating the burn rate. The Committee believes that the Corporation’s current three-year average burn rate for the period ended December 31, 2016 of 1.64% compares favorably to the Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) recommended burn rate benchmark of 2.98% for Russell 3000 (excluding S&P 500) banking institutions for meetings occurring on or after February 1, 2017, as set forth in Appendix D to the ISS report titled “Setting the Bar for Equity-Based Compensation” published December 21, 2016.

The Corporation has a market-competitive formula approach for awarding equity-based compensation. For each named executive officer (other than Mr. Klaeser), the Committee established a target for equity-based compensation based on a percentage of base salary. For 2016, the percentage of base salary for each named executive officer was as follows: Mr. Ramaker – 100%; and Ms. Gwizdala and Messrs. Amat, Kohn and Rathbun – 70%. After determining the equity-based compensation target for each named executive officer (other than Mr. Klaeser), the Committee in 2016 allocated the total target amount for each named executive officer as follows: restricted stock performance units – 60%, stock options – 30% and restricted stock service-based units – 10%. The Committee considers each named executive officer’s position and duties, responsibilities and authorities when setting the target equity compensation value and mix of awards. The Corporation calculates the number of long-term equity-based awards granted utilizing the fair value of the awards as of the date of grantchange in accordance with the same standard applied for financial accounting purposes.
In 2016, the Committee granted 31,353 restricted stock performance unitsloan servicing rights and 37,053 restricted stock service-based units to the named executive officers (other than Mr. Klaeser). Restricted stock performance units have both performance conditions and a service requirement (restricted period) that must be met to become vested. Restricted stock performance units granted in 2016 are earned based on the following performance targets: 75% of the awarded restricted stock performance units are earned based on the achievement of a target of diluted earnings per common sharenon-core extraordinary operating expenses, which in 2018 and 25%related exclusively to our core banking system conversion. The performance results also exclude the benefit of tax reform to prevent the restricted stock performance units are earned based on the achievement of a target of the efficiency ratio in 2018. The restricted stock performance units vest from 0.5x to 1.5x the number of units originally granted if the service requirement is satisfied at the end of the restricted period, depending on the predetermined performance targets met. No shares will be issued unless a performance condition has been achieved and


the service requirement has been satisfied at the end of the restricted period. Restricted stock service-based units granted in 2016 cliff vest between two and five years after the grant date.
Per Mr. Klaeser’s executive employment agreement with Chemical Financial (discussed below under the heading “Narrative to Summary Compensation Table and Equity-Based Awards and Values Tables”), in January 2017, Chemical Financial granted Mr. Klaeser restricted stock units equal in value to 80% of base salary, 60% of which were restricted stock performance units and 40% of which were restricted stock service-based units. 75% of the awarded restricted stock performance units are earned based on the achievement of a target of diluted earnings per common share in 2018 and 25% of the restricted stock performance units are earned based on the achievement of a target of the efficiency ratio in 2018. The restricted stock performance units vest from 0.5x to 1.5x the number of units originally granted if the service requirement is satisfied at the end of the restricted period, depending on the predetermined performance targets met. The restricted stock service-based units vest 40% on the third anniversary of the grant date and 60% on the fifth anniversary of the grant date. The intentenlargement of these awards due to what was to place Mr. Klaeser into the 2016 long term incentive plan. During 2016, as Chief Financial Officer of Talmer, he played a significant role in closing the transaction and as such helped to establish the foundation for the Corporation’s future success. Because these awards were granted in January 2017, the grant date fair value of the awards is not reflectedan unforeseen change in the Summary Compensation Table for 2016, but will be reflected intax code when the Summary Compensation Table for 2017.

Vesting of restricted stock performance units and restricted stock service-based units may be accelerated upon certain events, including a change in control of the Corporation followed by a qualifying termination of employment and advanced notification of retirement of the participant. Upon vesting, the restricted stock performance units and restricted stock service-based units will be converted to shares of the Corporation’s common stock on a one-to-one basis.
The following table contains information about the grant, vesting and forfeiture of performance-based awards:goals were established.

Measure Weighting Performance Goals Actual Achievement
 Threshold Target Maximum Result Funding Weighted
2018 Adjusted Diluted EPS (1)
 75% $3.34 $3.49 $3.56 $3.4 70% 52.5%
2018 Adjusted Efficiency Ratio (2)
 25% 57% 53% 51% 50.7% 150% 37.5%
Payout Funding -- 50% 100% 150% -- -- 90%
Performance-Based Awards (Shares/Units)(1)Adjusted to exclude (a) fair value change in loan servicing rights and non-core extraordinary operating expenses, which in 2018 related exclusively to our core banking system conversion, and (b) the benefit of tax reform adopted in December 2017.

(2)#Adjusted Efficiency Ratio is defined as (a) total operating expenses, excluding impairment of Shares/Units
Non-vested at Dec. 31, 2013140,505
Granted45,721
Vested(49,874)
Forfeited(2,941)
Non-vested at Dec. 31, 2014133,411
Granted51,250
Vested(43,676)
Forfeited(9,143)
Non-vested at Dec. 31, 2015131,842
Granted58,211
Vested(50,387)
Forfeited(1,752)
Non-vested at Dec. 31, 2016137,914
income tax credits, amortization of intangibles and the excluded items described in footnote (1) above, divided by (b) the sum of (i) net interest income, excluding the net interest income FTE adjustment, plus (ii) noninterest income, excluding the change in fair value of loan servicing rights and gain on sales of investment securities.

Additional Compensation Policies and Practices

Clawback Policy (“Recoupment”)

In 2016, the Committee granted awardsinterest of stock options to purchase 74,612 sharesfurther aligning the interests of the Corporation’s common stock to theour named executive officers (other than Mr. Klaeser). The Committee has no policy as to timing of awards of stock options. All stock option awards have been made at the market value of Chemical Financial’s common stock on the date of grant. Stock options are generally granted for a term of 10 years. All stock options permit the exercise price to be paid by delivery of cash, and the Committee has also approved the payment of the exercise price by surrendering shares of common stock having a market value equal to the exercise price. The stock options granted in 2016 vest in one-fifth increments on each anniversary date of the award over the first five years of the option term. Vesting of stock options may be accelerated upon certain events, including a change in control of the Corporation.



Retirement Plans.    Chemical Financial has a qualified pension plan that covers certain employees, a 401(k) savings plan that covers all employees and a supplemental pension plan currently covering only one active employee, the Chief Executive Officer. The Committee believes that Chemical Financial’s retirement plans encourage long-term commitment by the Corporation’s officers and assist Chemical Financial in attracting and retaining talented executives.
Merger Completion Awards.    The board of directors approved discretionary awards to the named executive officers, paid in the form of shares of the Company’s common stock. The purpose of these discretionary awards was to recognize the substantial contributionswith those of our executive team in completingshareholders, the Talmer merger. The value of the discretionary awards granted to the named executive officers was as follows: Mr. Ramaker – $0; Mr. Klaeser – $75,000; Ms. Gwizdala – $75,000; Messrs. Amat and Rathbun – $70,000; and Mr. Kohn – $50,000. The grant date fair value of the awards is included in the Summary Compensation Table for 2016. 
Clawback Policy.    The Committee adopted a “clawback” policy for incentive-based compensation awards made in 2014 and thereafter. The clawback policy provides that all long-term and annual incentive-based compensation, including service-vestedtime-vesting equity compensation and discretionary awards, that is earned after January 1, 2014 will be subject to repayment if it is paid to a member of the Senior Leadership Teaman executive officer in the three-year period preceding any date on which the Corporation iswe are required to disclose a restatement of itsour financial statements due to material noncompliance with financial reporting requirements under the federal securities laws or as a result of misconduct or fraud. Repayment under the clawback provision is limited to the amount of incentive-based compensation that exceeds the amount of such compensation whichthat the Corporation would have been paid to such Senior Leadership Team memberexecutive officer if the financial statements had been originally filed in their restated form. Any employee who has reasonable cause to believe that a violation under the clawback provision has occurred must promptly report such matters to the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee will exercise its business judgment in the fair application of the clawback policy and consider all relevant factors in determining whether the CorporationCompensation Committee will seek to recover incentive compensation from the Senior Leadership Team membersexecutive officer and the amount, timing and form of any incentive compensation recovery.



Stock Ownership Guidelines

Our stock ownership guidelines are designed to encourage share ownership so that our executives have a direct stake in Chemical and to align their interests with the long-term interests of our shareholders. The ownership guidelines cover all named executive officers and are as follows:
PositionRequired Salary Multiple
President and Chief Executive Officer5x base salary
All other executive officers3x base salary

In general, stock ownership is determined in the same manner as beneficial ownership for SEC reporting purposes. The following share types are included under these guidelines: shares directly owned, family-owned shares, retirement plan shares and unvested TRSUs. Stock options that are unexercised, regardless of their vesting status and in-the-money value, are not counted toward satisfaction of these guidelines. Unvested PRSUs are also not counted toward stock ownership.

Executives are required to comply with these guidelines within five years of becoming subject to this policy. Individuals who acquire shares of common stock under our equity-based incentive plans must hold at least 50% of all net after-tax acquired shares until the earlier of the date at which they satisfy our stock ownership guidelines, or 36 months following acquisition of such shares. Currently, all named executive officers are either in compliance with the guidelines or within the five-year compliance window.

Anti-Hedging Policy

Our anti-hedging policy aligns the interests of our directors and executive officers with our shareholders. The policy prohibits our directors and executive officers from engaging in any transaction that could hedge or offset decreases in the market value of our common stock, including short-selling, put or call options, forward sale or purchase contracts, equity swaps, and exchange funds.

Deductibility of Executive Compensation

Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m) generally prohibits a federal income tax deduction to public companies for compensation over $1,000,000 paid to a "covered employee." A "covered employee" includes (i) the Chief Executive Officer, (ii) the Chief Financial Officer, (iii) the three other most highly compensated executive officers, and (iv) any individual who was a covered employee for any taxable year beginning after December 31, 2016. Before 2018, we were permitted to receive a federal income tax deduction for qualifying “performance-based” compensation as defined under Code Section 162(m) without regard to this $1,000,000 limitation. However, recent U.S. tax legislation eliminated the performance-based exception. These new rules became effective starting in 2018 for us, except that certain equity awards that were granted on or before November 2, 2017 may still qualify as performance-based compensation. To the extent that in 2018 or any later year, the aggregate amount of any covered employee's salary, bonus, and amount realized from option exercises and vesting of restricted stock units or other equity awards, and certain other compensation amounts that are recognized as income for federal income tax purposes by the covered employee exceeds $1,000,000 in any year, we will not be entitled to a federal income tax deduction for the amount over $1,000,000 in that year. The Compensation Committee has not adopted a formal policy regarding tax deductibility of compensation paid to our executive officers, and may determine it is appropriate to provide compensation that may exceed deductibility limits in order to recognize performance, meet market demands, retain key executives, and take into account other appropriate considerations.

Employment Agreements

In 2018, we entered into new or amended employment agreements with each of our named executive officers. The terms have been negotiated and determined with consideration to the best interests of the Corporation and our shareholders. In attracting and securing a talented executive team, we believe we have positioned Chemical to successfully execute our growth strategy and vision.

We describe the material terms of our employment agreements with Mr. Provost, Mr. Torgow, Mr. Klaeser, Mr. Shafer and Mr. Ryan below under “Narrative to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table.”

Severance and Change in Control Arrangements

We provide severance benefits and in certain circumstances, change in control benefits, which are designed to retain our key executives, including our named executive officers, during a potential change in control and also to provide income continuation in the event of certain involuntary terminations.



Each of our employment agreements with Mr. Provost, Mr. Torgow, Mr. Klaeser, Mr. Shafer and Mr. Ryan include certain severance payments upon termination of employment, and our employment agreements with Mr. Klaeser, Mr. Shafer and Mr. Ryan include severance benefits in connection with a change in control of the Corporation. With respect to a change in control, each employment agreement that includes change in control provisions provides “double trigger” benefits to the executive, meaning that the severance benefits are paid only if we terminate the officer’s employment generally without cause or the executive either terminates his employment for good reason or experiences a good reason event (as applicable) following a change in control. For a detailed description of the severance and change in control benefits applicable to our named executive officers, see the discussion below under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”


Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

The following table shows information concerningcompensation we paid to our named executive officers for the compensation earned from Chemical Financial, or its subsidiaries, during the three years ended December 31, 2016, by the named executive officers.2018, 2017 and 2016. The positions listed in the table are those in which the named executive officer served at December 31, 2016.2018.
Name and
Principal Position
Year
Salary(1)
Bonus
Stock
Awards(2)(3)
Option
Awards(4)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation(5)
Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings(6)
All Other
Compensation(7)
Total
          
David B. Ramaker2016$687,412
$
$462,008
$197,999
$720,091
$335,014
$1,913,930
$4,316,454
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation and Chemical Bank2015634,380

548,409
183,599
484,092
261,000
13,157
2,124,637
2014569,042

424,757
170,840
468,800
705,000
12,207
2,350,646
Dennis L. Klaeser(8)
2016$183,483
$
$75,000
$
$
$
$11,607
$270,090
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation and Chemical Bank        

        

Lori A. Gwizdala2016$344,720
$
$1,463,801
$66,395
$269,228
$150,000
$17,360
$2,311,504
Executive Vice President Special Projects of Chemical Bank2015318,629

210,423
64,462
190,461

8,566
792,541
2014297,924

163,604
62,583
197,430
381,000
8,394
1,110,935
Thomas W. Kohn2016$329,174
$
$402,030
$69,009
$213,964
$74,000
$12,316
$1,100,493
Chief Executive Officer of InSite Capital, LLC and
Vice Chairman of Chemical Bank
2015331,172

176,345
66,998
183,606

9,158
767,279
2014309,652

153,858
65,051
181,975
239,000
8,968
958,504
Leonardo Amat2016$309,477
$
$298,687
$62,730
$241,248
$141,000
$26,589
$1,079,731
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer – Business Operations of Chemical Bank        

        

Robert S. Rathbun2016$309,477
$
$273,954
$62,730
$241,248
$191,000
$25,942
$1,104,351
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer – Customer Experience of Chemical Bank        

        



Name and
Principal Position
Year
Salary(1)
Bonus 
Stock
Awards(3)
 
Option
Awards(5)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation(6)
 
Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
All Other
Compensation(8)
Total
David T. Provost(9)
2018$456,731
$
 $2,980,668
(4) 
$
$
(7) 
$
$96,181
$3,533,580
President and Chief Executive Officer of Chemical2017823,390

 1,047,880
 

 
61,194
1,932,464
Dennis L. Klaeser2018$703,846
$
 $993,556
(4) 
$
$612,000
 $
$47,383
$2,356,785
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Chemical and Chemical Bank2017550,000
157,581
 944,839
 
342,419
 
36,654
2,031,493
 2016183,483

 75,000
 

 
11,607
270,090
Gary Torgow(9)
2018$456,731
$
 $2,980,668
(4) 
$
$
(7) 
$
$69,170
$3,506,569
Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors of Chemical2017823,390

 1,047,880
 

 
32,303
1,903,573
Thomas C. Shafer(9)
2018$903,846
$
 $993,556
(4) 
$
$969,000
 $
$59,252
$2,925,654
Vice Chairman of Chemical and President and Chief Executive Officer of Chemical Bank2017562,500
111,229
 647,341
 132,005
538,771
 
52,975
2,044,821
J. Brennan Ryan(10)
2018$300,000
$520,000
(2) 
$520,000
(4) 
$
$
 $
$15,162
$1,355,162
Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice President of Chemical and Chemical Bank           

(1)Includes salary deferred under the Chemical Financial Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan and the Chemical Financial Corporation Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan. For a description of changes related to base salary in 2018, see the discussion entitled "Elements of Compensation–Base Salary" in the CD&A section of this Proxy Statement.

(2)Amounts reported include the grant date fair valuesThis amount reflects his guaranteed incentive payment under terms of restricted stock performance units and restricted stock service-based units granted to the named executive officershis Employment Agreement, as further explained under "Elements of Compensation–Other 2018 Cash Bonus Payments" in the respective years. CD&A section of this Proxy Statement.

(3)The values of all stock awards reported in this column were computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification, ASC Topic 718 Compensation-Stock Compensation (ASC 718). For a discussion of the valuation assumptions, see Note 1618 to the Corporation’s 2016our 2018 consolidated financial statements included in the Corporation’sour Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. Restricted stock performance units granted to2018.



(4)Represents the named executive officers in 2016, 2015following amounts: Mr. Provost – $1,780,673 of PRSUs and 2014$1,199,995 of TRSUs; Mr. Klaeser – $593,558 of PRSUs and $399,998 of TRSUs; Mr. Torgow – $1,780,673 of PRSUs and $1,199,995 of TRSUs; Mr Shafer – $593,558 of PRSUs and $399,998 of TRSUs; and Mr. Ryan – $520,000 of TRSUs. The PRSUs were determined to have a value at the grant date based on management’smanagement's assessment that it was probable that the restricted stock performance unitsPRSUs would vest in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively,2021 at 1.0x the number of units granted. For restricted stock performance units,However, if the Corporation does not achieve the minimum performance conditions or the named executive officer does not satisfy the service requirements, then the restricted stock performance units will be forfeited and the named executive officers will receive no shares of Chemical common stock attributable to the forfeited units. For restricted stock service-based units, if the named executive officer does not satisfy the service requirements, then the restricted stock service-based units will be forfeited and the named executive officers will receive no shares of Chemical common stock attributable to the forfeited units. The amounts also include the aggregate grant date fair value of the discretionary awards earned by the named executive officers upon the completion in 2016 of the merger and systems conversions of Talmer, in 2015 upon the completion of the acquisitions and systems conversions of Monarch Community Bancorp, Inc. and Lake Michigan Financial Corporation, and in 2014 upon completion of the acquisition and systems conversion of Northwestern Bancorp, Inc.
(3)If the highest level of performance conditions with respect to the restricted stock performance unitsPRSUs granted in 20162018 are satisfied, then the value of the restricted stock performance units and the restricted stock service-based units, combined,PRSUs, determined as of the grant date would be as follows: Mr. RamakerProvost$660,019, Ms. Gwizdala$2,671,010; Mr. Klaeser$1,455,215,$890,337; Mr. KohnTorgow$421,049,$2,671,010; Mr. AmatShafer$291,413, and Mr. Rathbun – $266,680.$890,337.

(4)(5)This amount represents the grant date fair value, computed in accordance with ASC 718, of the stock options granted for each named executive officer. For a discussion of theour valuation assumptions, see Note 1618 to the Corporation’s 2016our 2018 consolidated financial statements included in the Corporation’sour Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.2018. The per share exercise price of each option award was equal to the market value of Chemical Financialour common stock on the date each option was granted.
(5)This amount represents the annual cash bonus incentive earned by each named executive officer.

(6)This amount isFor a further description of how the positive changeCompensation Committee determined incentive payments awarded in 2018, see the actuarial present valuediscussion entitled "Elements of the named executive officer’s accumulated benefitCompensation–Annual Cash Incentive Plan" under the Corporation’s noncontributory defined benefit pension plan (Pension Plan)Compensation Discussion and for Mr. Ramaker only, the Corporation’s Supplemental Pension Plan (Supplemental Plan), as he is the only active employee who is a participant in the Supplemental Plan. The discount rates used to calculate the present valuesAnalysis section of Pension Plan and Supplemental Plan benefits at December 31, 2016 were 4.22% and 3.63%, respectively. Negative changes in 2015 for Ms. Gwizdala and Mr. Kohn of $16,000 and $29,000, respectively, are not included in the table. In addition, for 2016, for Mr. Ramaker only, includes $13,014 of preferential earnings associated with the lump sum payment under the Supplemental Plan, the payment of which was delayed as further described in footnote 7 below. See footnote 7 below for additional information about the Supplemental Plan.this Proxy Statement.

(7)
“All Other Compensation” consistsIn February 2019, the Committee determined that each of employer contributionsMr. Provost and Mr. Torgow was eligible to receive a cash incentive payment of at least $950,000 under the 2018 annual incentive plan, based on our corporate performance and his individual performance relative to the 401(k) Savings Plan,goals established by the taxable portionCommittee. However, the Committee determined that to more closely align the interests of employer paid premiumsMr. Provost and Mr. Torgow with those of our shareholders, it would exercise its discretion under the plan not to award a cash incentive payment to either Mr. Provost or Mr. Torgow for life insurance, dividend equivalents earned on2018. Instead, in February 2019, the Committee awarded each of Mr. Provost and Mr. Torgow time-vesting restricted stock service-based units, and for Messrs. Amat and Rathbun only, a car allowance and company-paid country club dues. As permitted by SEC regulations, perquisites that in the aggregate total less than $10,000 per named executive officer are not included. For Mr. Ramaker only, “All Other Compensation” includes the amount of the benefit owing Mr. Ramakeror TRSUs, under the Supplemental2017 Stock Plan which became payable inwith a lump-sum payment as a result of the Corporation undergoing a change in controlgrant date fair value equal to $950,000 (the target amount each officer would have been eligible to receive under the Supplemental Plan dueannual incentive plan). The TRSUs vest ratably over a three-year-period, in each case subject to continued service through the Talmer merger. The total amount of this benefit was $1,898,082. The Committee and the board of directors determinedvesting date, subject to delay payment of the amounts owing under the Supplemental Plan to Mr. Ramaker on the basis that such payment would not be deductible under Section 162(m) of the Code, with such payment to be made to Mr. Ramaker during the period beginning with the date of Mr. Ramaker’s separation from service and ending on the later of the last day of the taxable year in which Mr. Ramaker separates from service or the 15th day of the third month following Mr. Ramaker’s separation from service. See “Amendments to Compensation Plans and Deferral of Accelerated Benefits” above for additional information.
certain exceptions.

(8)Amounts in this column include the following for 2018:

Mr. Provost: $16,500 of employer contributions to the 401(k) Savings Plan; $990 consisting of the taxable portion of employer paid premiums for life insurance; $10,000 of additional stipend to cover other company deductions; $26,771 in dividend equivalents earned on TRSUs; $10,800 in car allowances; and $31,120 in company-paid club dues.

Mr. Klaeser: $16,500 of employer contributions to the 401(k) Savings Plan; $1,980 consisting of the taxable portion of employer paid premiums for life insurance; $17,968 in dividend equivalents earned on TRSUs; and $10,935 in company-paid club dues.

Mr. Torgow: $16,500 of employer contributions to the 401(k) Savings Plan; $990 consisting of the taxable portion of employer paid premiums for life insurance; $10,000 of additional stipend to cover other company deductions; $26,771 in dividend equivalents earned on TRSUs; $10,800 in car allowances; and $4,109 in company-paid club dues.

Mr. Shafer: $16,500 of employer contributions to the 401(k) Savings Plan; $1,980 consisting of the taxable portion of employer paid premiums for life insurance; $14,124 in dividend equivalents earned on TRSUs; $10,800 in car allowances; and $15,848 in company-paid club dues.

Mr. Ryan: $138 consisting of the taxable portion of employer paid premiums for life insurance; $6,125 in dividend equivalents earned on TRSUs; $4,985 in car allowances; and $3,914 in company-paid club dues.

(9)Mr. KlaeserProvost, Mr. Shafer and Mr. Torgow joined the CorporationChemical on August 31, 2016 upon completion of the Talmer merger and qualified as a named executive officerofficers for the first time in 2016.2017.

(10)Mr. Ryan joined Chemical on July 9, 2018.



Realized CompensationGrants of Plan-Based Awards Table
To supplement the SEC required disclosure in the Summary Compensation Table, the
The following additional table has been included which shows the total compensation realized by eachprovides a summary regarding plan-based equity and non-equity incentive awards to our named executive officer, including incentive compensation elements that were earned and vested during the three years ended December 31, 2016. The Corporation believes that this table is useful to shareholders as it believes it reflects the compensation actually realized by the named executive officers. The Summary Compensation Table, as calculated under the SEC rules, includes several items that are impacted by accounting and actuarial assumptions and also may include amounts that are not ultimately realized, and therefore that table may not necessarily be reflective of realized compensationofficers in a particular year.2018.
     Value Realized   
Name and
Principal Position
YearSalaryBonus
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation(1)
 Vesting of Stock
Awards(2)
Exercise of Stock Options(3)
All Other Compensation(4)
Total
Percent
of Reported(5)
          
David B. Ramaker2016$687,412
$
$720,091
$678,298
$
$15,848
$2,101,649
49%
 2015634,380

484,092
606,445
36,290
13,157
1,774,364
84
2014569,042

468,800
562,476
375
12,207
1,612,900
69
Dennis L. Klaeser2016$183,483
$
$
$75,000
$
$11,607
$270,090
100%
Lori A. Gwizdala2016$344,720
$
$269,228
$284,053
$358,462
$17,360
$1,273,823
55%
 2015318,629

190,461
222,138
16,110
8,566
755,904
95
2014297,924

197,430
192,859

8,394
696,607
63
Thomas W. Kohn2016$329,174
$
$213,964
$267,323
$314,599
$12,316
$1,137,376
103%
 2015331,172

183,606
188,635
9,100
9,158
721,671
94
2014309,652

181,975
184,338
4,122
8,968
689,055
72
Leonardo Amat2016$309,477
$
$241,248
$156,327
$
$26,589
$733,641
68%
Robert S. Rathbun2016$309,477
$
$241,248
$114,945
$29,859
$25,942
$721,471
65%
  
Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1) (2)
Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan AwardsAll Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#)
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($)(3)
NameGrant Date
Threshold
($)
Target
($)
Maximum
($)
Threshold
(#)
Target
(#)
Maximum
(#)
David T. Provost $475,000
$950,000
$1,425,000
     
 
2/27/2018(4)
   17,345
34,689
52,034

$1,780,673
 
2/27/2018(5)
   


21,417
1,199,995
Dennis L. Klaeser $300,000
$600,000
$900,000
     
 
2/27/2018(4)
   5,782
11,563
17,345

$593,558
 
2/27/2018(5)
   


7,139
399,998
Gary Torgow $475,000
$950,000
$1,425,000
     
 
2/27/2018(4)
   17,345
34,689
52,034

$1,780,673
 
2/27/2018(5)
   


21,417
1,199,995
Thomas C. Shafer $475,000
$950,000
$1,425,000
     
 
2/27/2018(4)
   5,782
11,563
17,345

593,558
 
2/27/2018(5)
   


7,139
399,998
J. Brennan Ryan $
$
$
     
 
7/9/2018(6)
   


8,981
520,000
(1)Amounts represent the annual cash bonus incentive earned byFor each named executive officer.officer, amounts reported represent the potential payout range pursuant to our 2018 Annual Incentive Plan, which we refer to as the annual incentive plan, with all payments subject to achievement of corporate and individual performance objectives and the discretion of the Committee. The annual incentive plan is further explained in "Elements of Compensation-Annual Cash Incentive Plan" in the CD&A of this Proxy Statement. Actual amounts earned under the annual incentive plan in 2018 are included in the column entitled “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” of the Summary Compensation Table above.

(2)Amounts reported include (a) restricted stock performance units grantedMr. Ryan was hired in 2013, 2012July 2018 and 2011 that vestedtherefore did not participate in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, based on the Corporation’s performance targetsannual incentive plan. Under his employment agreement, he was entitled to a guaranteed incentive payment of $520,000 in 2015, 2014 and 2013 being met at 1.5x, 1.1x, and 1.175x, respectively, of targeted performance and the service requirement being met in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively; (b) restricted stock service-based units granted in 2012 that were vested in 2015 based on the service requirement being met in 2015; and (c) the discretionary award earned by the named executive officers upon the completion in 2016 of the merger and systems conversion of Talmer, in 2015 upon the completion of the acquisitions and systems conversions of Monarch Community Bancorp, Inc. and Lake Michigan Financial Corporation, and in 2014 upon completion of the acquisition and systems conversion of Northwestern Bancorp, Inc. The value of vested stock awards is calculated by multiplying the number of shares issuable by the closing price of the Corporation’s common stock at the date the shares were vested, including the grant date fair value of the stock portion of discretionary awards.2018.

(3)Stock options increase in value only if the market price of the Corporation’s common stock increases in value after the date of grant. The value realized on stock options is the difference between the market price of the Corporation’s common stock on the date the stock option is exercised and the stock option exercise price multiplied by the number of options exercised.
(4)“All Other Compensation” consists of employer contributions to the 401(k) Savings Plan, the taxable portion of employer paid premiums for life insurance, dividend equivalents earned on restricted stock service-based units and for Messrs. Amat and Rathbun only, a car allowance and company-paid country club dues. As permitted by SEC regulations, perquisites that invalues shown are the aggregate total less than $10,000 per named executive officer are not included.
(5)Computed by dividing total realized compensation in the “Total” column by “Total” compensation disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table.




Equity-Based Awards and Values
Named executive officers were granted equity-based compensation awards during 2016. The following table provides information concerning restricted stock performance units, stock options and restricted stock service-based units granted during 2016.
  
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards
 
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards
All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units
(#)
All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)
Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Share)(1)
Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock
and
Option
Awards(2)
($)
NameGrant Date
Threshold
($)
Target
($)
Maximum
($)
 
Threshold
(#)
Target
(#)
Maximum
(#)
             
David B. Ramaker
2/16/2016(3)
        32,195
$32.81$197,999
 
2/16/2016(4)
    6,765
13,529
20,294
   395,994
 
2/16/2016(5)
       2,012
  66,014
Dennis L. Klaeser
1/4/2017(6)
       1,369
  $75,000
Lori A. Gwizdala
2/16/2016(3)
        10,796
$32.81$66,395
 
2/16/2016(4)
    2,269
4,537
6,806
   132,798
 
2/16/2016(5)
       675
  22,147
 
8/31/2016(5)
       3,976
  183,810
 
11/11/2016(5)
       21,256
  1,050,046
 
1/4/2017(6)
       1,369
  75,000
Thomas W. Kohn
2/16/2016(3)
        11,221
$32.81$69,009
 
2/16/2016(4)
    2,358
4,715
7,073
   138,008
 
2/16/2016(5)
       701
  23,000
 
8/31/2016(5)
       4,132
  191,022
 
1/4/2017(6)
       912
  50,000
Leonardo Amat
2/16/2016(3)
        10,200
$32.81$62,730
 
2/16/2016(4)
    2,143
4,286
6,429
   125,451
 
2/16/2016(5)
       637
  20,900
 
8/31/2016(5)
       1,781
  82,336
 
1/4/2017(6)
       1,277
  70,000
Robert S. Rathbun
2/16/2016(3)
        10,200
$32.81$62,730
 
2/16/2016(4)
    2,143
4,286
6,429
   125,451
 
2/16/2016(5)
       637
  20,900
 
8/31/2016(5)
       1,246
  57,603
 
1/4/2017(6)
       1,277
  70,000

(1)Represents the closing market price of Chemical Financial common stock on the date of grant.
(2)Grantgrant date fair values of equity-based compensationvalue for initial awards are computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The value of the restricted stock performance units was determined based on management’s assessment that it was probable that the awards would vest at 1.0x the number of units granted (representing satisfaction of the target performance conditions).
(3)Represents the award of stock options granted in 2016 under the Stock Incentive Plan of 2015.

(4)Represents restricted stock performance unitsthe award of PRSUs granted in 20162018 under the 2017 Stock Incentive Plan, of 2015. These restricted stock performance units will be earned in full or in part if Chemical Financial achieves, for 2018, the threshold, target, or maximum performance conditions established by the Compensation and Pension Committee. These restricted stock performance units have bothwith a performance conditionperiod that ends on December 31, 2020. The vesting is subject to the achievement of pre-established performance targets and the officer’s continued service through the vesting date. See "Elements of Compensation-Long-Term Equity Compensation-Annual Long-Term Incentive Awards- February 2018" and "Elements of Compensation-Long-Term Equity Compensation-Strategic Awards-February 2018" in the CD&A of this Proxy Statement for a service requirement (restricted period) that must be met to become vested.description of the terms of these awards. Any restricted stock performance unitsPRSUs that vest will be converted to shares of Chemical Financial’sour common stock on a one-for-one basis. Restricted stock performance unitsPRSUs that do not vest will be forfeited and the named executive officers will receive no shares of Chemical Financial common stock attributable to the forfeited units.forfeited.

(5)Represents the award of restricted stock service-based unitsTRSUs granted in 20162018 under the 2017 Stock Plan. See "Elements of Compensation-Long-Term Equity Compensation-Annual Long-Term Incentive PlanAwards-February 2018" and "Elements of 2015. The restrictedCompensation-Long-Term Equity Compensation-Strategic Awards-February 2018" in the CD&A of this Proxy Statement for a description of the terms of these awards. Any vested units will convert to shares of our common stock service-based units granted on February 16, 2016 cliffa one-for-one basis. TRSUs that do not vest five years after the grant date. The restricted stockwill be forfeited.


service-based units granted on August 31, 2016 cliff vest three years after the grant date. The restricted stock service-based units granted on November 11, 2016 cliff vest on December 31, 2018. Any restricted stock service-based units that vest will be converted to shares of Chemical Financial’s common stock on a one-for-one basis. Restricted stock service-based units that do not vest will be forfeited and the named executive officer will receive no shares of Chemical Financial common stock attributable to the forfeited units.
(6)Represents the discretionary award of TRSUs granted toin 2018 under the named executive officers upon completion2017 Stock Plan. See “Elements of Compensation-Long-Term Equity Compensation-Long-Term Incentive Grant-July 2018” in the CD&A of this Proxy Statement for a description of the merger and system conversionterms of Talmer. The discretionary award was included in the amountthis award. Any vested units will convert to shares of compensation for 2016 reported for each named executive officer in the Summary Compensation Table and Realized Compensation Table.our common stock on a one-for-one basis. TRSUs that do not vest will be forfeited.

Narrative to Summary Compensation Table and Equity-BasedGrants of Plan-Based Awards Table

Employment Agreements with Mr. Provost and Values TablesMr. Torgow
A description of the material terms of the
On February 27, 2018, we entered into new executive employment agreements with each of Mr. Provost, our Chief Executive Officer and President, and Mr. Torgow, the Executive Chairman of our board of directors, each of whom continued to serve in


these roles under their new employment agreements. These new employment agreements supersede and replace each executive’s prior employment agreement dated August 9, 2017.

Each employment agreement has an initial term of two years that commenced on March 1, 2018, the effective date, that automatically renews for successive one-year periods, unless either party provides the other party with notice of intention to terminate at least 30 days before an anniversary of the effective date, in which case the agreement will terminate at the end of the then-current term. Under the new employment agreements, each executive’s annual base salary was increased from $1.00 to $950,000 effective July 1, 2018. Each executive’s base salary will be reviewed by the Compensation Committee at least annually and can be increased in the Committee’s sole discretion. In addition to base salary, each executive is:

eligible to participate in our annual bonus and equity programs for senior executives;
entitled to an annual taxable stipend to cover deduction for other benefits under our group health care plan or for any other purpose in the amount of $20,000, with such stipend terminating on June 30, 2018;
eligible to participate in such employee benefit programs as are generally made available to our senior executives;
entitled to a monthly automobile allowance of $900; and
eligible for reimbursement for membership in two country clubs of his selection.

Each of the employment agreements provides for certain payments upon termination, as described below under “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.” Each employment agreement also requires the executive to keep corporate information confidential. In addition, each executive is subject to provisions related to non-competition and non-solicitation of customers and employees for a period of 24 months following termination of his employment.

For a discussion of awards under our annual cash incentive plan and long-term equity incentive plan, see “Elements of Compensation-Annual Cash Incentive Plan” and “Elements of Compensation-Long-Term Equity Compensation” in the CD&A section of this Proxy Statement.

Employment Agreements with Mr. Klaeser and Mr. Shafer

On July 1, 2018, we entered into new executive employment agreements with each of Mr. Klaeser, the namedExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Chemical and Chemical Bank, and Mr. Shafer, the Chief Executive Officer of Chemical Bank and Vice Chair of Chemical, each of whom continued to serve in these roles under their new employment agreements. These new employment agreements supersede and replace Mr. Klaeser’s employment agreement dated August 31, 2016 and Mr. Shafer’s employment agreement dated October 16, 2017.

Each employment agreement has an initial term of two years that commenced on July 1, 2018, the effective date, that automatically renews for successive one-year periods, unless either party provides the other party with notice of intention to terminate at least 30 days before an anniversary of the effective date, in which case the agreement will terminate at the end of the then-current term. Under the employment agreement, Mr. Klaeser will receive an annual base salary of $750,000, and Mr. Shafer will receive an annual base salary of $950,000. Each officer’s base salary will be reviewed by the Compensation Committee at least annually beginning in 2019 and is subject to adjustment. In addition to base salary, each executive officers (other thanis:

eligible to participate in any equity-based compensation programs that we offer, with an initial annual target for equity plan awards of 80% of base salary (in the case of Mr. Kohn) follows. Chemical Financial did not enterKlaeser), and 100% of base salary (in the case of Mr. Shafer);
eligible to participate in our annual bonus programs for senior executives, with an initial annual target bonus equal to 80% of base salary (in the case of Mr. Klaeser), and 100% of base salary (in the case of Mr. Shafer);
eligible to participate in health and dental, life insurance, short and long term disability insurance, retirement and other employee fringe benefit programs covering our salaried employees as a group, and in any programs applicable to our senior executives;
entitled to a monthly automobile allowance of $900; and
eligible for reimbursement of up to $12,000 per year for Mr. Klaeser and $25,000 per year for Mr. Shafer for country club membership dues.

Each of the employment agreements provides for certain payments upon termination, as described below under “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.” Each employment agreement also requires the executive to keep corporate information confidential. In addition, each executive is subject to provisions related to non-competition and non-solicitation of customers and employees for a period of 24 months following termination of his employment.



For a discussion of awards under our annual cash incentive plan and long-term equity incentive plan, see “Elements of Compensation-Annual Cash Incentive Plan” and “Elements of Compensation-Long-Term Equity Compensation” in the CD&A section of this Proxy Statement.

Employment Agreement with Mr. Ryan

On July 9, 2018, we entered into an executive employment agreement with Mr. Kohn.
Mr. Ramaker willRyan to serve as the Chief ExecutiveOperating Officer and Executive Vice President and as a director of Chemical Financial and Chemical Bank. TheHis agreement has an initial term of his agreement is for two years with an automatic renewal term ofthat automatically renews for successive one-year on each anniversary date of the agreement, subject toperiods, unless either party being ableprovides the other party with notice of intention to terminate the agreement upon 30-days’ noticeat least 30 days before an anniversary date of the agreement.effective date, in which case the agreement will terminate at the end of the then-current term.

Under the employment agreement, Mr. RamakerRyan will receive an annual base salary of $740,000 and$650,000. Mr. Ryan’s base salary will be entitledreviewed by the Compensation Committee at least annually beginning in 2019 and is subject to adjustment. In addition to base salary, he is:

eligible to participate in Chemical’s bonus,any equity-based compensation programs that we offer, with an initial annual target for equity plan awards of 80% of base salary beginning in 2019 and fringe benefits plans. If Mr. Ramaker’s employment is terminated by Chemical other than for good cause (as defined in the agreement) or within two years after, or within six months before, a change in control (as defined in the agreement) or if he terminates employment for good reason, Mr. Ramaker is entitled to certain severance benefits, including a cash payment equal to two times the sum of his then-current salary and the average cash bonus paid to him in each of the last three completed years, compensation for continuing health care benefits, the acceleration of vesting of all unvested equity awards and outplacement services. Mr. Ramaker’s agreement includes a Section 280G cap that limits payments under the agreement as necessary to avoid tax penalties under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code.
Mr. Klaeser will serve as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Chemical Financial and Chemical Bank. The terms of Mr. Klaeser’s agreement are substantially similar to those described above for Mr. Ramaker, except that Mr. Klaeser will receive an annual salary of $550,000 and he is entitled to participate in Chemical’s bonus and equity plans at certain specified levels, including, at or as soon as administratively feasible following the effective time of the Merger, he is entitled to an awardone-time time-vesting grant of restricted stock units equal in value2018 in the amount of 80% of his base salary, vesting on December 15, 2019;
eligible to participate in our annual bonus programs for senior executives, with an annual payment of up to 80% of his base salary, 60%with a guaranteed payment for 2018 of $520,000, which will be restricted stock performance units and 40%is equal to 100% of which will be restricted stock service-based units.his target award under the annual incentive plan;
Ms. Gwizdala will serve as Executive Vice President, Special Projects, of Chemical Bank. In this role, Ms. Gwizdala’s primary responsibility is to oversee the creation and development of the Corporation’s Dodd-Frank Act Stress Testing methodologies and processes. The terms of Ms. Gwizdala’s agreement are substantially similar to those described above for Mr. Ramaker, except that Ms. Gwizdala will receive an annual salary of $400,000 and she is entitledeligible to participate in Chemical’s bonushealth and equity plans at certain specified levels, including, at ordental, life insurance, short and long term disability insurance, retirement and other employee fringe benefit programs covering our salaried employees as soon as administratively feasible following the effective time of the Merger, she is a group, and in any programs applicable to our senior executives;
entitled to an awarda monthly automobile allowance of restricted stock units equal in value$900; and
eligible for reimbursement of up to $1,050,000, 100% of which will be restricted stock service-based units.
Mr. Amat will serve as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer – Business Operations of Chemical Bank. The terms of Mr. Amat’s agreement are substantially similar to those described above$10,000 per year for Mr. Ramaker, except that Mr. Amat will receive an annual salary of $330,000 and his severance cash payment is equal to one times the sum of his then-current salary and the average cash bonus paid to him in each of the last three completed years.
Mr. Rathbun will serve as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer – Customer Experience of Chemical Bank. The terms of Mr. Rathbun’s agreement are substantially similar to those described above for Mr. Ramaker, except that Mr. Rathbun will receive an annual salary of $330,000 and his severance cash payment is equal to one times the sum of his then-current salary and the average cash bonus paid to him in each of the last three completed years.
The discussion above under the heading “Modifications to Restricted Stock Units” is here incorporated by reference.country club membership dues.

His employment agreements provides for certain payments upon termination, as described below under “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.” His employment agreement also requires him to keep corporate information confidential. In addition, he is subject to provisions related to non-competition and non-solicitation of customers and employees for a period of 24 months following termination of his employment.


Mr. Ryan was hired in July 2018 and therefore did not participate in the annual incentive plan. For a discussion of his awards under our long-term equity incentive plan, see “Elements of Compensation-Long-Term Equity Compensation” in the CD&A section of this Proxy Statement.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table provides information concerning stock options outstanding, exercisable and unexercisable, restricted stock performance unitsPRSUs and restricted stock service-based unitsTRSUs outstanding that have not vested for each named executive officer as of December 31, 2016:2018:
  Option Awards Stock Awards
Name
Award
Date
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable (#)Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable (#)Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#)
Option
Exercise
Price ($)(1)
Option
Expiration
Date
 
Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That Have
Not
Vested (#)
Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested ($)(2)
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)(3)
Equity Incentive Plan Awards:
Market or Payout Value of Unearned
Shares, Units or
Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested ($)(2)
David T. Provost



$

 
30,595(5)
$1,120,083
34,689(6)

$1,269,964
            
Dennis L. Klaeser



$

 
25,128(7)
$919,932
16,844(8)

$616,659
            
Gary Torgow



$

 
30,595(9)
$1,120,083
34,689(10)

$1,269,964
            
Thomas C. Shafer2/21/2017
1,777
7,104(4)


$53.72
2/22/2027
 
19,731(11)
$722,359
17,072(12)

$625,006
 8/9/2017
1,145
4,578(4)


46.95
8/10/2027
     
J. Brennan Ryan



$

 
9,121(13)
$333,920

$
            
   
Option Awards(1)
 
Stock Awards(2) 
 Name
Award
Date
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options Unexercisable
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options
Option
Exercise
Price(3)
Option
Expiration
Date
 
Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That Have
Not
Vested(4)
Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested(5) 
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested(6)
Equity Incentive Plan Awards:
Market or Payout Value of Unearned
Shares, Units or
Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested(5)
 
             
 David B. Ramaker7/20/200736,115
 
 $24.78
7/20/2017  
 
 
 
  2/25/20086,235
  24.52
2/25/2018  
 
 
 
  4/28/20097,949
  21.10
4/29/2019  
 
 
 
  3/25/20106,829
  24.56
3/26/2020     
  4/19/20119,681
  19.97
4/20/2021  
 
  
  2/21/201221,093
  23.78
2/22/2022     
  2/22/201322,199
  25.14
2/23/2023 2,452
$132,825
  
  2/18/201417,722
  29.45
2/19/2024 19,514
1,057,073
  
  2/27/201521,857
  30.18
2/28/2025 2,145
116,195
13,525
$732,649
  2/16/2016 32,195
 32.81
2/17/2026 2,064
111,807
13,529
732,866
 Dennis L. Klaeser1/2/201376,185
  $16.24
1/2/2023     
  6/10/2014      10,158
$550,259
  
  3/25/2015      15,745
852,907
  
  2/22/2016      15,745
852,907
  
 Lori A. Gwizdala4/28/20094,222
 
 $21.10
4/29/2019  
 
 
 
  3/25/20103,627
  24.56
3/26/2020  
 
 
 
  4/19/20114,706
  19.97
4/20/2021  
 
 
 
  2/21/201210,937
  23.78
2/22/2022  
 
  
  2/22/201310,948
  25.14
2/23/2023 908
$49,186
  
  2/18/20146,492
  29.45
2/19/2024 7,148
387,207
  
  2/27/20157,674
  30.18
2/28/2025 753
40,790
4,749
$257,253
  2/16/2016 10,796
 32.81
2/17/2026 692
37,486
4,537
245,769
  8/31/2016      4,021
217,818
  
  11/11/2016      21,364
1,157,288
  
 Thomas W. Kohn4/28/20094,107
 
 $21.10
4/29/2019  
 
 
 
  3/25/20103,528
  24.56
3/26/2020  
 
 
 
  4/19/20114,894
  19.97
4/20/2021  
 
  
  2/21/201211,375
  23.78
2/22/2022     
  2/22/201311,379
  25.14
2/23/2023 942
$51,028
  
  2/18/20146,748
  29.45
2/19/2024 7,429
402,429
  
  2/27/20157,976
  30.18
2/28/2025 783
42,415
4,936
$267,383
  2/16/2016 11,221
 32.81
2/17/2026 719
38,948
4,715
255,412
  8/31/2016      4,178
226,322
  
 Leonardo Amat2/22/20135,649
  $25.14
2/23/2023 936
$50,703
  
  2/18/20144,466
  29.45
2/19/2024 2,991
162,022
  
  2/27/20155,279
  30.18
2/28/2025 777
42,090
1,633
$88,460
  2/16/2016 10,200
 32.81
2/17/2026 653
35,373
4,286
232,173
  8/31/2016      1,801
97,560
  
 Robert S. Rathbun3/25/20101,096
  $24.56
3/26/2020  
 
 
 
  4/19/20111,284
  19.97
4/20/2021  
 
  
  2/21/20122,900
  23.78
2/22/2022     
  2/22/20134,905
  25.14
2/23/2023 651
$35,265
  
  2/18/20144,809
  29.45
2/19/2024 2,104
113,974
  
  2/27/20155,684
  30.18
2/28/2025 669
36,240
1,055
$57,149
  2/16/2016 10,200
 32.81
2/17/2026 653
35,373
4,286
232,173
  8/31/2016      1,260
68,254
  


 
(1)Stock options granted after 2012 vest in five equal installments on the first, second, third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of the award date shown in the table.
(2)The restricted stock performance units granted in 2016, 2015 and 2014 vest in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, if certain minimum performance conditions are met during the relevant performance period and the relevant service conditions are satisfied at the end of the restricted period. If the relevant minimum performance conditions are not met during the relevant performance period, or the relevant service conditions are not satisfied at the end of the restricted period, then the restricted stock performance units will be forfeited and the named executive officers will receive no shares of Chemical Financial common stock attributable to the forfeited units. The restricted stock service-based units granted in February 2016 cliff vest in February 2021, the restricted stock service-based units granted in August 2016 cliff vest on August 31, 2019, the restricted stock service-based units granted in November 2016 cliff vest on December 31, 2018, the restricted stock service-based units granted in 2015 cliff vest in February 2020, the restricted stock service-based units granted in 2014 cliff vest in February 2019 and the restricted stock service-based units granted in 2013 cliff vest in February 2018 if the service conditions are met. If the relevant service conditions are not met, then the restricted stock service-based units will be forfeited and the named executive officers will receive no shares of Chemical Financial common stock attributable to the forfeited units.
(3)Represents the closing market price of Chemical Financialour common stock on the date of the grant.



(4)With the exception of Mr. Klaeser, represents the number of earned but unvested restricted stock performance units that were granted in 2014 and the number of unvested restricted stock service-based units granted in 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016. For Mr. Klaeser, represents restricted stock awards that were granted by Talmer that were assumed by the Corporation and vest upon completion of future service requirements. The restricted stock awards granted in 2014 and 2015 vest on August 31, 2017 and the restricted stock awards granted in 2016 vest one-third per year from the date of grant.
(5)(2)
Computed by multiplying the number of shares reported in the preceding column by the closing price of Chemical Financial’sour common stock as reported on The NASDAQ Stock Market® at December 31, 20162018 of $54.17$36.61 per share.

(6)(3)Represents PRSUs that are subject to the achievement of pre-established performance targets and the officer’s continued service through the vesting date, which is on the date of the issuance of the audit opinion with respect to our consolidated financial statements that include the year ending on the last day of the performance period. Any PRSUs that vest will be converted to shares of our common stock on a one-for-one basis. PRSUs that do not vest will be forfeited. The number of unearned restricted stock performance units. Reported assumingPRSUs reported assumes the units are earned and vested at 1.0x the number of units granted (representing satisfaction of corporate performance goals at the target performance conditions)level).

(4)Represents stock options that vest ratably on the anniversary date of the grant date over a period of five years.

(5)Represents the following unvested awards granted to Mr. Provost:

8,635 shares of restricted stock granted by Talmer that were assumed by us in the merger that vested on February 22, 2019.

21,960 TRSUs, which includes 543 dividend equivalent units earned since the grant date, that vest in equal 20% increments on each of the first five anniversaries of the February 27, 2018 grant date, based on his continued employment.

(6)Represents 34,689 shares of PRSUs with a performance period ending December 31, 2020 that vest as described in footnote 3, above.

(7)Represents the following unvested awards granted to Mr. Klaeser:

5,249 shares of restricted stock granted by Talmer that were assumed by us in the merger that vested on February 22, 2019.

3,988 TRSUs, which includes 181 dividend equivalent units earned since the grant date, that vest 40% on August 31, 2019 and 60% on August 31, 2021, based on his continued employment.

3,431 TRSUs, which includes 155 dividend equivalent units earned since the grant date, that cliff vest on the fifth anniversary of the February 21, 2017 grant date, based on his continued employment.

5,140 shares of PRSUs with a performance period ended December 31, 2018 for which the performance conditions have been met but will not vest until the service condition is met as described in footnote 3, above.

7,320 TRSUs, which includes 181 dividend equivalent units earned since the grant date, that vest in equal 20% increments on each of the first five anniversaries of the February 27, 2018 grant date, based on his continued employment.

(8)Represents the following shares of unvested PRSUs granted to Mr. Klaeser:

5,281 shares with a performance period ending December 31, 2019 that vest as described in footnote 3, above.

11,563 shares with a performance period ending December 31, 2020 that vest as described in footnote 3, above.

(9)Represents the following unvested awards granted to Mr. Torgow:

8,635 shares of restricted stock granted by Talmer that were assumed by us in the merger that vested on February 22, 2019.

21,960 TRSUs, which includes 543 dividend equivalent units earned since the grant date, that vest in equal 20% increments on each of the first five anniversaries of the February 27, 2018 grant date, based on his continued employment.

(10)Represents 34,689 shares of PRSUs with a performance period ending December 31, 2020 that vest as described in footnote 3, above.

(11)Represents the following unvested awards granted to Mr. Shafer:

5,249 shares of restricted stock granted by Talmer that were assumed by us in the merger that vested on February 22, 2019.

3,371 TRSUs, which includes 153 dividend equivalent units earned since the grant date, that cliff vest on August 31, 2021, based on his continued employment.

580 TRSUs, which includes 26 dividend equivalent units earned since the grant date, that cliff vest on February 21, 2022, based on his continued employment.

315 TRSUs, which includes 11 dividend equivalent units earned since the grant date, that cliff vest on August 9, 2022, based on his continued employment.



20162,896 shares of PRSUs with a performance period ended December 31, 2018 for which the performance conditions have been met but will not vest until the service condition is met as described in footnote 3, above.

7,320 TRSUs, which includes 181 dividend equivalent units earned since the grant date, that vest in equal 20% increments on each of the first five anniversaries of the February 27, 2018 grant date, based on his continued employment.

(12)Represents the following shares of unvested PRSUs granted to Mr. Shafer:

5,509 shares with a performance period ending December 31, 2019 that vest as described in footnote 3, above.

11,563 shares with a performance period ending December 31, 2020 that vest as described in footnote 3, above.

(13)Represents 9,121 TRSUs, which includes 140 dividend equivalent units earned since the grant date, that cliff vest on December 15, 2019, based on his continued employment.

2018 Option Exercises and Stock Vested

The following table provides information concerning stock options exercised and stock awards vested in 20162018 for the named executive officers:
 Option Awards Stock Awards
Name
Number of
Shares
Acquired
on Exercise(1)
 
Value
Realized
on Exercise(2)
 
Number of
Shares
Acquired
on Vesting(3)
 
Value
Realized
on Vesting(4)
        
David B. Ramaker
 $
 19,604
 $678,298
Dennis L. Klaeser
 
 
 
Lori A. Gwizdala17,903
 358,462
 6,042
 209,053
Thomas W. Kohn16,452
 314,599
 6,281
 217,323
Leonardo Amat
 
 2,495
 86,327
Robert S. Rathbun2,672
 29,859
 1,299
 44,945
 Option Awards Stock Awards
Name
Number of
Shares
Acquired
on Exercise(1)
 
Value
Realized
on Exercise(2)
 
Number of
Shares
Acquired
on Vesting(3)
 
Value
Realized
on Vesting(4)
        
David T. Provost
 $
 8,634
 $484,212
Dennis L. Klaeser(5)
76,185
 3,260,718
 5,248
 294,325
Gary Torgow
 
 8,634
 484,212
Thomas C. Shafer
 
 5,248
 294,325
J. Brennan Ryan
 
 
 
(1)The number of shares shown is the gross number of shares covered by stock options exercised. The Corporation’sOur share-based compensation plans permit the withholding of shares in payment of the stock option exercise price and for tax withholding purposes, resulting in a smaller number of shares acquired.

(2)The value of exercised stock options is calculated by multiplying the number of stock options exercised by the difference between the closing price of the Corporation’sour common stock on the date of the exercise and the stock option exercise price.
(3) The number of shares shown is the gross number of shares covered by awards that were granted in prior years that vested in 2016.
(3)The number of shares shown is the gross number of shares covered by awards that vested in 2018. Shares for the required tax withholding were deducted from the gross number of shares vested, resulting in a smaller number of shares acquired upon vesting.

(4)
The dollar values reported in this column were calculated using the closing price of Chemical Financial’sour common stock as reported on The NASDAQ Stock Market® on February 26, 2016 of $34.60 per share for restricted stock performance units, which was the vesting date of the stock awards.

(5)Represents stock options that were granted by Talmer that we assumed in the merger.


Pension Benefits in 20162018
The following table provides information concerning pension benefits for the named executive officers who are entitled to such benefits as of December 31, 2016:
NamePlan Name
Number
of Years of
Credited Service
Present
Value of 
Accumulated
Benefit
Payments
During Last
Fiscal Year
     
David B. RamakerEmployees’ Pension Plan27.2$1,581,000
$
 Supplemental Plan27.224,000

Lori A. GwizdalaEmployees’ Pension Plan30.01,754,000

Thomas W. KohnEmployees’ Pension Plan30.01,688,000

Leonardo AmatEmployees’ Pension Plan26.0746,000

Robert S. RathbunEmployees’ Pension Plan30.01,012,000

Chemical Financial’sWe have a noncontributory Pension Plan that is considered a tax-qualified retirement plan. Chemical Financial hasUnder the Pension Plan, we have the authority to change or terminate the Pension Plan at any time. The Internal Revenue Code limits bothEffective June 30, 2006, we stopped accepting new participant in the amountPension Plan. Since all of eligible compensation for benefit calculation purposes andour NEOs joined Chemical after 2006, none of our NEOs are participants in the annual benefits that may be paid from a tax-qualified retirement plan. As permitted by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), Chemical Financial established a Supplemental Plan that provides for the payment to certain executive officers of Chemical Financial, as determined byPension Plan. In addition, in July 2017, the Compensation and Pension Committee of the benefitsdetermined to which they would have been entitled, calculated under the provisions offreeze the Pension Plan as if the limits imposed by the Internal Revenue Code did not apply. As of December 31, 2016, Mr. Ramaker was the only active employee eligible forsuch that no additional benefits under the Supplemental Plan.
As discussed above, as result of the Talmer merger, a change in control of Chemical Financial occurred under the Supplemental Plan, which caused the benefit owing Mr. Ramaker under the Supplemental Plan to become payable in a lump-sum payment. The Committee and the board of directors determined to delay payment of the amount owing under the Supplemental Plan to Mr. Ramaker on the basis that such payments would not be deductible under Section 162(m) of the Code, with such payments to be made to Mr. Ramaker during the period beginning with the date of Mr. Ramaker’s separation from service and ending on the later of the last day of the taxable year in which Mr. Ramaker separates from service or the 15th day of the third month following Mr. Ramaker’s separation from service. This amount is no longer reflected in the “Present Value of Accumulated Benefit” column in the table above because it is no longer owing to Mr. Ramaker under the Supplemental Plan, but, because the payment was delayed, this amount is now considered deferred compensation owing to Mr. Ramaker and is reflected in the table below under the heading “2016 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation.” The amount for Mr. Ramaker reflected in the table above includes the present value of accumulated benefit under the Supplemental Plan since August 31, 2016 (the date of completion of the Talmer merger).

Pension Plan benefits are based on the annual base salary of eligible employees as of January 1 of each year. The amount shown in the column “Salary” in the Summary Compensation Table in this proxy statement is representative of the most recent calendar year compensation used in calculating average payaccrued under the Pension Plan (subject to any applicable cap under ERISA for employees who are not included in the Supplemental Plan). Upon retirement at age 65, a retiree will receive an annual benefit of 1.52% of his or her average annual base salary for the five highest consecutive years during the ten years preceding his or her date of retirement, (subject to any applicable cap under ERISA for employees who are not included in the Supplemental Plan) multiplied by the retiree’s number of years of credited service (subject to a maximum of 30 years). Benefits at retirement ages under 65 are also determined based upon length of service and pay, as adjusted in accordance with the Pension Plan. The Pension Plan provides for vesting of benefits after attaining five years of service, disability and death benefits, and optional joint and survivor benefits for the employee and his or her spouse. Additionally, unreduced Pension Plan benefits are available for retirement at age 60 and above when the retiree’s age plus vested years of service equals at least 85. Pension Plan benefits for non-grandfathered employees will be based on years of credited service as of June 30, 2006 and generally average annual base salary as of January 1 for the five years preceding June 30, 2006.
The present value of accumulated benefits under the Pension Plan shown in the Pension Benefits table is based on the assumption that an employee retires at the earliest unreduced retirement age defined under the Pension Plan; which is the earlier of normal retirement age or age 60 or older with 85 points (age plus vested years of service). The assumed retirement age is age 60 for all named executive officers. The present value of accumulated benefits is also based on the assumption that the employee will elect a benefit for his or her life with 120 monthly payments guaranteed. If the employee were to elect a benefit payable to a surviving spouse of 50% or more of the employee’s retirement benefit or for the employee’s life only, or retire beyond age 65, the retirement benefit for the employee would be adjusted. The benefits listed in the Pension Benefits table are not subject to a deduction for social security or any other offset amount.


The present value of accumulated Pension Plan and Supplemental Plan benefits at December 31, 2016 was computed using discount rates of 4.22% and 3.63%, respectively, and the RP-2014 mortality tables projected using the mortality improvement scale MP-2016 as required by the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA). Lump-sum retirement benefits are not available in the Pension Plan, unless an employee is involuntarily terminated or the option was available in a predecessor plan. In the event the named executive officers are involuntarily terminated, lump-sum retirement benefits would be $1,198,173 for Mr. Ramaker, $1,130,610 for Ms. Gwizdala, $1,450,471 for Mr. Kohn, $436,687 for Mr. Amat and $643,598 for Mr. Rathbun. In addition, Mr. Ramaker’s benefits under the Supplemental Plan, upon a change in control (as defined in the Supplemental Plan) of Chemical Financial, would become payable in a lump-sum payment. At December 31, 2016, Mr. Ramaker’s pro forma lump-sum distribution payable in the event of a change in control was calculated at $24,000 using interest and mortality assumptions set forth under IRC Section 417(e)(3) as modified by the PPA.

Deferred Compensation

In September 2006, the board of directors approved the Chemical Financial Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan (DC Plan)(the “DC Plan”), a voluntary nonqualified supplemental retirement program for a select group of management personnel. The DC Plan is unfunded for tax purposes and for purposes of ERISA. The named executive officers in this proxy statement are eligible to participate


in the DC Plan. There are noThe DC Plan was amended on January 1, 2017 to allow an employer discretionary contribution to make up for lost employer contributions toin the DC401k Plan.

Participants may elect to defer up to 75%85% of their salary, excluding bonus,compensation to the DC Plan. The election to defer compensation under the DC Plan is irrevocable for each plan year as of the beginning of the plan year. Participant contributions are made into a grantor trust for the purpose of providing for payment of the deferred compensation under this plan. The investment of employee contributions are self-directed by participants within an established array of money market, equity and fixed income mutual funds. The aggregate earnings on these investments, by each named executive officer who is a participant in the DC Plan, are included in the table below, and are attributable to the specific investments selected by each participant. Participants may change the designation of their investments at such times as mutually agreed by the parties. As of December 31, 2016,2018, participants could change their investment designation on a daily basis.

Participants elect, in advance of the deferral of their compensation, when the funds will be distributable. The aggregate balances of the participants are distributable, as designated by each participant, during January of the calendar year following the calendar year in which any of the following occur: the participant’s termination of employment; a change in control; the participant’s death or disability; an unforeseeable emergency; or at a specified time, as determined by the participant. The DC Plan provides forplan allows distributions to be made in a lump-sum amount, five-year installmentslump sum or ten-year installments,up to 15 annual installments. Participants may change their current distribution election as electedlong as the change is made at least 12 months prior to their first payment and is delayed by the participant.at least 5 years. 

As a result of the Talmer merger, a change in control of Chemical Financial occurred under the DC Plan, which caused all deferred compensation under the Deferred Compensation Plan to become payable in a lump-sum payment The Committee and the board of directors determined to delay payment of the amount owing under the DC Plan to Mr. Ramaker on the basis that such payments would not be deductible under Section 162(m) of the Code, with such payments to be made to Mr. Ramaker during the period beginning with the date of Mr. Ramaker’s separation from service and ending on the later of the last day of the taxable year in which Mr. Ramaker separates from service or the 15th day of the third month following Mr. Ramaker’s separation from service.
20162018 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

The following table provides information concerning nonqualified deferred compensation for the named executive officers as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016:2018:
Name
Executive
Contributions
 in
Last FY(1)
Company
Contributions in
Last FY
Aggregate
Earnings in
Last FY(2)
Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions(3)
Aggregate
Balance at
Last FYE(4)
      
David B. Ramaker$247,988
$
$37,327
$
$687,141
    Supplemental Plan(5)
1,898,082

28,632

1,926,714
Dennis L. Klaeser




Lori A. Gwizdala76,000

23,956
289,350
25,902
Thomas W. Kohn117,000

55,366
507,075
41,733
Leonardo Amat




Robert S. Rathbun





Name
Executive
Contributions
 in Last FY(1)
Company
Contributions in
Last FY
Aggregate
Earnings in
Last FY(2)
Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
Aggregate
Balance at
Last FYE(3)
David T. Provost$
$
$(36,483)$
$426,264
Dennis L. Klaeser

(197,188)
3,712,725
Gary Torgow

17,448

1,269,173
Thomas C. Shafer429,000

(39,097)
789,313
J. Brennan Ryan




(1)Amounts included in this column are included in the Salary“Salary” column in the Summary Compensation Table. In addition, for Mr. Ramaker, amounts included in this column reflect the benefit formerly owing Mr. Ramaker under the Supplemental Plan, which became payable in a lump-sum payment upon completion of the Talmer merger. The Committee and the board of directors determined to delay payment of the amount owing under the Supplemental Plan to Mr. Ramaker on the basis that such payments would not be deductible under Section 162(m) of the Code, with such payments to be made to Mr. Ramaker


during the period beginning with the date of Mr. Ramaker’s separation from service and ending on the later of the last day of the taxable year in which Mr. Ramaker separates from service or the 15th day of the third month following Mr. Ramaker’s separation from service. As a result, this amount is now considered deferred compensation owing to Mr. Ramaker and is reflected as an executive contribution in 2016.
(2)Amounts included in this column are not included in the Summary Compensation Table.

(3)Amounts included in this column reflect the amounts that became payable in a lump-sum payment upon completion of the Talmer merger.
(4)The aggregate balance at last fiscal year-end shown in this column includes contributions in prior years which were reported as “Salary” and “All Other Compensation” on the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year. Contributions in prior years that have previously been reported as “Salary” are as follows: $360,990 for Mr. Ramaker, $187,990 for Ms. Gwizdala, and $310,322 for Mr. Kohn. For Mr. Ramaker, the amount reflected in this column includes his balance under the DC Plan and the benefit formerly owing Mr. Ramaker under the Supplemental Plan, which become payable in a lump-sum payment upon completion of the Talmer merger, the payment of which was delayed as described in footnote 1.
(5)Represents the benefit formerly owing Mr. Ramaker under the Supplemental Plan, which became payable in a lump-sum payment upon completion of the Talmer merger, the payment of which was delayed as described in footnote 1 above. This benefit accrues interest at an annual rate of 4.5% compounded monthly.




Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control
Our named executive officers may receive
Each of our employment agreements with Mr. Provost, Mr. Torgow, Mr. Klaeser, Mr. Shafer and Mr. Ryan provide for certain severance payments in connection with aupon termination of employment, orincluding with respect to Mr. Klaeser, Mr. Shafer and Mr. Ryan, upon a qualifying termination following a change in control under theirof the Corporation, each subject to the executive’s execution of a general release and waiver of claims against us or our affiliates.

Each executive’s employment agreement provides that his employment may be terminated:

by either executive or us at any time or for any reason or for no reason upon not less than 30 days prior written notice;
by us for “cause” (as defined in the employment agreement) without prior notice;
by the executive for “good reason” (as defined in the employment agreement) with prior written notice; and
upon executive’s death or if executive is “disabled” (as defined in the employment agreement).

In addition to the employment agreements, the Pension Plan, the Supplemental Plan and the DC Plan, all as described above, which descriptions are here incorporated by reference.
Our shareholder-approvedcertain equity compensation plansaward agreements with each executive provide for the acceleration of vesting of equity awards on the occurrence of certain events, as described below.



Agreements with Mr. Provost and Mr. Torgow

Employment Agreements dated February 27, 2018

Mr. Provost’s and Mr. Torgow’s employment agreements each provide that if the executive is terminated by us without “cause” or the executive terminates his employment for “good reason,” each as defined in connectionthe employment agreement, then the executive is entitled to receive severance pay in the amount of two times executive’s then base salary (disregarding any reduction in base salary due to a good reason termination and with base salary calculated as the higher of actual base salary or $950,000), plus two times the average of executive’s bonuses under our annual cash incentive plan for each of the three most recently completed calendar years, including complete calendar years with Talmer Bank and Trust (with each bonus calculated as the higher of the actual bonus or $1.5 million). We will also pay each executive a lump sum amount equal to 24 times the executive’s monthly contribution towards COBRA for employee dependent health, prescription drug and dental coverage elections under our employee benefit plans providing such benefits, minus the COBRA administrative cost (whether or not executive elects COBRA). Our decision not to renew the term of the employment agreements will also constitute our termination of the agreement without cause.

In addition, all equity-based awards granted to the executive on or after February 27, 2018 that remain outstanding on the date executive (a) is terminated by us without “cause,” (b) terminates his employment for “good reason,” or (c) dies, the awards will be treated as follows:

all unvested stock options will immediately vest, and together with other vested stock options, will remain exercisable for a period of up to three years from termination;
all outstanding TRSUs will automatically vest and be convertible into our common stock; and
all PRSUs will automatically vest at the 100% of the applicable target level.

Restricted Stock Awards Assumed from Talmer Bancorp, Inc. (granted before the February 27, 2018 Employment Agreements)

Mr. Provost and Mr. Torgow each entered into restricted stock award agreements with Talmer Bancorp, Inc., which we assumed in our merger with Talmer Bancorp, Inc. Under these restricted stock agreements, any unvested shares of restricted stock will immediately vest upon the executive’s termination without cause (as defined in the agreement). All remaining restricted stock awards granted under these agreements vested in February 2019.

TRSU and PRSU Agreements dated February 27, 2018

We entered into TRSU and PRSU agreements with each of Mr. Provost and Mr. Torgow on February 27, 2018 that provide that, in the event of the executive’s termination due to disability, or if the executive provides one year written notice before his intended retirement (as defined in the 2017 Stock Plan), then executive will be issued (a) with respect to TRSUs, a pro rata number of TRSUs based on the number of months that have passed since the last annual vesting date, or if no vesting date has occurred, the grant date, and (b) with respect to PRSUs, a pro rata number of PRSUs granted at the target (100%) level based on the number of months that have elapsed between the first day of the “performance period” (as defined in the agreement) and the effective date of the executive’s termination. As described above, each executive’s Employment Agreement will govern the treatment of TRSUs and PRSUs granted under the TRSU and PRSU Agreements dated February 27, 2018 in the event the executive (a) is terminated by us without “cause,” (b) terminates his employment for “good reason,” or (c) dies. See “-Agreements with Mr. Provost and Mr. Torgow-Employment Agreements dated February 27, 2018.”

TRSU and PRSU Agreements dated February 25, 2019

We entered into TRSU and PRSU agreements with each of Mr. Provost and Mr. Torgow on February 25, 2019. Under such TRSU agreements, if the executive is terminated without “cause” by us or the executive terminates his employment for “good reason,” in either case following a “change in control” (each as defined in the agreement), all TRSUs granted to the executive, including TRSUs issued under prior agreements and plans, will 100% vest. Under such PRSU agreements, in the event of a “change in control” (as defined in the agreement), all PRSUs granted to the executive, including PRSUs issued under prior agreements and plans, for which performance results have not been measured will be measured as of the latest practicable date prior to the consummation of the change in control and the number of PRSUs will be fixed at the greater of the target (100%) performance level or actual performance (the “Earned Awards”), and such Earned Awards will vest and be subject to forfeiture based on the executive’s continued service through the performance period. If, however, the executive is terminated without cause by us or the executive terminates his employment for good reason, in either case following a change in control, such Earned Awards will 100% vest. In the event of the Company or termination of employment due to the death, disability or retirement of the plan participant.
Underany conflict between the terms of the TRSU or PRSU agreement (as applicable), and any employment, retention or change in control agreement with the executive (an “individual agreement”) and/or the terms of the 2017 Stock Incentive Plan, the provisions of 2012the TRSU or PRSU agreement (as applicable), or, to the extent more favorable, the individual agreement will


control; provided, however, that any provisions of the TRSU or PRSU agreement (as applicable) relating to the timing of settlement or payment in respect of the TRSUs or PRSUs (as applicable) will control in the event of any conflict between the TRSU or PRSU agreement (as applicable), the 2017 Stock Plan, any prior plan and the award agreements thereunder, and any individual agreement.

Agreements with Mr. Klaeser and Mr. Shafer

Employment Agreements dated July 1, 2018 (and Stock Incentive PlanOptions and PRSU Agreements granted before November 2, 2017)

The following is a description of 2015,the severance benefits under our employment agreements with each of Mr. Klaeser and Mr. Shafer dated July 1, 2018, and our stock option and PRSU agreements with Mr. Klaeser and Mr. Shafer granted before November 2, 2017.

Termination Without Cause by Chemical or for Good Reason by the Executive. Under the employment agreements, if Mr. Klaeser’s or Mr. Shafer’s employment is terminated without “cause” by us or for “good reason” by the executive (each as defined in the agreement), and such termination is not within six months before or two years after a participant terminates his“change in control” (as defined in the agreement), each is entitled to receive severance in the amount of two times the executive’s then current base salary (disregarding any reduction in base salary due to a good reason termination) plus the average of the executive’s cash bonuses under our annual cash incentive plan for each of the three most recently completed calendar years (or such lesser number of completed calendar years that executive has been employed by us), payable in equal installments over 104 weeks. We will also pay each executive a lump sum health care stipend in the amount of $10,000, and will provide each executive with executive-level outplacement services for a period not to exceed 12 months.

Under the employment agreements, at the time of such termination, the restrictions on all time-vesting restricted stock will lapse, all TRSUs will immediately vest and convert into shares of our common stock, and all PRSUs will be settled at 100% of target; provided, that, any stock options or her employment because of death, disability or retirement,PRSUs granted before November 2, 2017, will continue to be subject to their terms on such date. The PRSU award agreements granted on February 21, 2017 (to Mr. Klaeser and Mr. Shafer) and on August 9, 2017 (to Mr. Shafer) provide that (a) if the executive is terminated without cause, then the restricted stock performance units and restricted stock service-based units held byrestrictions on such participant may vestPRSUs will lapse on a pro-rata basis. However, the restricted stock performance units will vest only if the Company achieves at least the threshold level of relevant performance conditions. If the threshold level of performance is achieved, the participant will vest in a number of restricted stock performance units determined by multiplying the number of units that would have vested had the participant continued his or her employment by the percentage of the performance period completed prior to the termination (i.e., the number of full months completed divided by 36). Restricted stock service-based units will vestpro rata basis based on the number of full months completedthat have elapsed since the grant date divided by the vesting periodnumber of full months in the restricted period; provided, that, the restrictions will not lapse until the end of the grant,applicable performance period and then only if we satisfied the applicable performance conditions, and (b) if the executive terminates his employment for good reason, the unvested PRSUs will be forfeited. The PRSU award agreements granted on January 4, 2017 (to Mr. Klaeser and Mr. Shafer) and the outstanding stock option award agreements (to Mr. Shafer) provide that such unvested equity awards will automatically be forfeited if the executive is terminated without cause or if he terminates his employment for good reason.

Termination Six Months Before or Within Two Years Following a Change in Control. Under the employment agreements, if Mr. Klaeser’s employment is terminated without cause by us or if he terminates his employment for good reason, or if Mr. Shafer’s employment is terminated without cause by us, within two years following a change in control within six months before the date of a change in control, we will pay each executive a lump sum cash payment in the amount of two times the executive’s then current base salary (disregarding any reduction in base salary due to a good reason termination) plus the average of the executive’s cash bonuses under our annual cash incentive plan for each of the most recent three complete calendar years (or such lesser number of completed calendar years that executive has been employed by us), which wouldwe refer to as the “change in control payment.” We will also pay each executive a lump sum health care stipend in the amount of $10,000, and will provide each executive with executive-level outplacement services for a period not to exceed 12 months. In addition, with respect to Mr. Shafer, if during the term of his agreement, a good reason event occurs within two years following a change in control, he will receive a lump sum retention bonus in the amount of the change in control payment. If Mr. Shafer received such a retention bonus, he will no longer be 36entitled to a change in control or 60 months. If an employee retires and gives minimum advance notification of retirement, all restricted stock service-based units vest upon retirement. All remaining restricted stock performance units and restricted stock service-based units are forfeited and returned toother cash severance payment if he is later terminated by us without cause.

Under the Company, except thatemployment agreements, unless specified otherwise in the Compensation and Pension Committee may, in its sole discretion, waive the restrictions remaining on anypurchase agreement or all such remaining shares or units.
Outstandingother controlling agreement, unvested stock options outstanding at the time of a change in control will continue to vest under the vesting schedule, and if we are not acceleratedthe surviving entity, all unvested stock options will be converted into shares of the surviving entity’s common stock at the applicable exchange ratio; provided, that, any stock options granted before November 2, 2017, will continue to be subject to their terms on such date.

All of Mr. Shafer’s outstanding stock options were awarded before November 2, 2017, and under these award agreements, if he is terminated by us without cause or he terminates his employment for “good reason” following a “change in control” (each as defined in the award agreement), then any stock options assumed by the surviving corporation will become fully exercisable, or will be paid out in cash if such stock options have not been assumed. Generally, the treatment of TRSUs and PRSUs following a change in control is set forth below under “TRSU and PRSU Agreements dated February 25, 2019,” unless the treatment of such equity awards under the executive’s employment agreement is deemed more favorable.



Death or Disability. Under the employment agreements, neither Mr. Klaeser nor Mr. Shafer is entitled to any additional severance payments in the event of termination of his employment due to retirement, death or disability. StockHowever, under the employment agreements, in the event of either executive’s death or disability, all equity-based awards will be treated as follows: all unvested stock options will immediately vest, the restrictions on all time-vesting restricted stock will lapse, all TRSUs will immediately vest and be convertible into shares of our common stock, and all PRSUs will be settled at 100% of target; provided, that, any stock options or PRSUs granted before November 2, 2017, will continue to be subject to their terms on such date.

All of Mr. Shafer’s outstanding stock options were awarded before November 2, 2017, and under these award agreements, upon his death or disability, all unvested stock options will be forfeited and vested stock options will remain exercisable until the earlier of the date such options expire or one year after his death or disability. The PRSU award agreements granted on February 21, 2017 (to Mr. Klaeser and Mr. Shafer) and on August 9, 2017 (to Mr. Shafer) provide that if the executive is terminated because of his death or disability, then the restrictions on such PRSUs will lapse on a pro rata basis based on the number of full months that have elapsed since the grant date divided by the number of full months in accordancethe restricted period; provided, that, the restrictions will not lapse until the end of the applicable performance period and then only if we satisfied the applicable performance conditions. The PRSU award agreements granted on January 4, 2017 (to Mr. Klaeser and Mr. Shafer) provide that such unvested equity awards will automatically be forfeited if the executive is terminated because of death or disability.

Retirement. Under the employment agreements, if Mr. Klaeser’s or Mr. Shafer’s employment is terminated due to “retirement” with one year’s advance notice, as defined in each agreement, then all equity-based awards will be treated as follows: all unvested stock options will immediately vest, the restrictions on all time-vesting restricted stock will lapse, all TRSUs will immediately vest and be convertible into shares of our common stock, and all PRSUs will be settled at 100% of target; provided, that, any stock options or PRSUs granted before November 2, 2017, will continue to be subject to their terms on such date.

All of Mr. Shafer’s outstanding stock options were awarded before November 2, 2017, and under these award agreements, upon his retirement, all unvested stock options will terminate and vested stock options will remain exercisable until the earlier of the date such options expire or three years after his retirement. The PRSU award agreements granted on February 21, 2017 (to Mr. Klaeser and Mr. Shafer) and on August 9, 2017 (to Mr. Shafer) provide that, in the event the executive provides one year advance notice of his “retirement,” as defined in the applicable equity plan, then the restrictions on such PRSUs will lapse on a pro rata basis based on the number of full months that have elapsed since the grant date divided by the number of full months in the restricted period; provided, that, the restrictions will not lapse until the end of the applicable performance period and then only if we satisfied the applicable performance conditions. If, however, the executive retires without providing one year advanced notice, any such unvested PRSUs will be forfeited. The PRSU award agreements granted on January 4, 2017 (to Mr. Klaeser and Mr. Shafer) provide that if the executive retires (as defined in the Stock Incentive Plan of 2015), with or without notice, then the restrictions on such PRSUs will lapse on a pro rata basis based on the number of full months that have elapsed since the grant date divided by the number of full months in the restricted period; provided, that, the restrictions will not lapse until the end of the applicable performance period and then only if we satisfied the applicable performance conditions.

TRSU and PRSU Agreements dated February 25, 2019

We entered into TRSU and PRSU agreements with each of Mr. Klaeser and Mr. Shafer on February 25, 2019. Under such TRSU agreements, if the executive is terminated without “cause” by us or the executive terminates his employment for “good reason,” in either case following termination duea “change in control” (each as defined in the agreement), all TRSUs granted to retirement.the executive, including TRSUs issued under prior agreements and plans, will 100% vest. Under such PRSU agreements, in the event of a “change in control” (as defined in the agreement), all PRSUs granted to the executive, including PRSUs issued under prior agreements and plans, for which performance results have not been measured will be measured as of the latest practicable date prior to the consummation of the change in control and the number of PRSUs will be fixed at the greater of the target (100%) performance level or actual performance (the “Earned Awards”), and such Earned Awards will vest and be subject to forfeiture based on the executive’s continued service through the performance period. If, however, the executive is terminated without cause by us or the executive terminates his employment for good reason, in either case following a change in control, such Earned Awards will 100% vest. In the event of death,any conflict between the options may be exercisedterms of the TRSU or PRSU agreement (as applicable), and any employment, retention or change in control agreement with the executive (each an “individual agreement”) and/or the terms of the 2017 Stock Plan, the provisions of the TRSU or PRSU agreement (as applicable), or, to the extent more favorable, the individual agreement will control; provided, however, that any provisions of the TRSU or PRSU agreement (as applicable) relating to the timing of settlement or payment in respect of the TRSUs or PRSUs (as applicable) will control in the event of any conflict between the TRSU or PRSU agreement (as applicable), the 2017 Stock Plan, any prior plan and the award agreements thereunder, and any individual agreement.



Agreements with Mr. Ryan

Employment Agreement dated July 9, 2018

Termination Without Cause by the personal representativeCorporation or for Good Reason by the Executive. Under his employment agreement, if Mr. Ryan’s employment is terminated without “cause” by us or for “good reason” by him (each as defined in the agreement), and such termination is not within six months before or two years after a “change in control” (as defined in the agreement), he is entitled to receive a severance payment in the amount of two times his then current base salary (disregarding any reduction in base salary due to a good reason termination) plus the average of his cash bonuses under our annual cash incentive plan for each of the three most recently completed calendar years (or such participantlesser number of completed calendar years that executive has been employed by us), payable in one lump sum (the “severance payment”). We will also pay Mr. Ryan a lump sum health care stipend in the amount of $10,000, and will provide him with executive-level outplacement services for a period not to exceed 12 months. At the time of one year after death, but only tohis termination, all outstanding equity awards will be treated in accordance with the extent thatterms of the decedent wasapplicable equity plan or award agreement.

Death or Disability. Under the employment agreement, Mr. Ryan is not entitled to exerciseany additional severance payments in the stock options and not beyondevent of termination of his employment due to death or disability. At the original termtime of the stock options. Stock options may be exercised for one year following termination due to death or disability, but only toall outstanding equity awards will be treated in accordance with the extent thatterms of the participant was entitled to exercise the stock options onapplicable equity plan or award agreement.

Termination Six Months Before or Within Two Years Following a Change in Control. Under his employment agreement, if Mr. Ryan’s employment is terminated without cause by us or for good reason by him within two years following a change in control or within six months before the date of a change in control, he is entitled to receive the above-referenced severance payment. We will also pay Mr. Ryan a lump sum health care stipend in the amount of $10,000, and will provide him with executive-level outplacement services for a period not to exceed 12 months. At the time of his termination, and not beyondall outstanding equity awards will be treated in accordance with the original termterms of the stock options.applicable equity plan or award agreement.

IfTRSU Agreement dated July 9, 2018

We entered into a TRSU agreement with Mr. Ryan on July 9, 2018. Under the agreement, in the event of Mr. Ryan’s termination without “cause” by us, or if he terminates his employment for “good reason” (each as defined in the agreement), or if he dies or is disabled, or if he provides one year written notice before his intended retirement after reaching age 55 with ten years of service, then all remaining restrictions on the TRSUs will lapse and such award will 100% vest. In addition, under his TRSU agreement, if Mr. Ryan is terminated without cause by us or if he terminates his employment for good reason, in either case within two years following a “change in control” (as defined in the agreement), all the TRSUs will 100% vest.

Potential Post-Employment Payments Due to Our Named Executive Officers

The following table shows potential post-employment payments due to Mr. Provost, Mr. Klaeser, Mr. Torgow, Mr. Shafer and Mr. Ryan upon termination from the Corporation for various reasons, including a change in control of the Company occurs, all outstanding stock options become vestedCorporation, assuming that those events occurred on December 31, 2018. If we terminate such named executive officer’s employment for “cause” or the executive resigns, then we have no further obligation to such named executive officer except for payment of any amounts earned and exercisable in full immediately prior tounpaid as of the effective timedate of the change in control and shall remain exercisable duringtermination. Accordingly, those events are omitted from the remaining terms thereof, regardlesstable. In addition, at December 31, 2018, none of whether the participants remain in the employ or service of the Company or any subsidiary, and all other outstanding equity awards shall become immediately fully vested and issuable and nonforfeitable, including the waiver of all performance conditions (provided that the award agreement governing outstanding unvested RSUs provide that accelerated vesting occurs only upon a qualifying termination of employment post-change in control). Restricted stock performance units that have not been earned, and unvested restricted stock service-based units, become vested at 1.0x the number of units issued. Each restricted stock performance unit and each restricted stock service-based unit is converted into one share of the Company’s common stock.

The description of executive employment agreements under the heading “Narrative to Summary Compensation Table and Equity-Based Awards and Values Tables” above is here incorporated by reference.

The following table shows the aggregate amounts our named executive officers wouldwere eligible for retirement and, therefore, we have realizedomitted retirement (with or without notice) from the table as well. We report amounts in connection with a changethe table without any reduction for possible delay in control, assuming that such change in control took place on December 31, 2016.

    Acceleration of Vesting  
 Termination Scenario 
Non-Equity
Based
Compensation(1)
 

Stock
Options(2)
 
Time-Vested
Stock
Awards(3)
 
Performance-
Based
Stock Awards(3)(4)
 Total
                
 David B. Ramaker      
   
   
   
    Retirement with Notice $
 $
 $475,167
 $
 $475,167
    Retirement without Notice  
  
  
  
  
    Death  
  
  227,878
  
  227,878
    Disability  
  
  227,878
  
  227,878
    For Cause Termination  
  
  
  
  
    Discretionary Resignation by Executive  
  
  
  
  
    Discretionary Termination by Corporation  2,623,222
  687,685
  475,167
  2,408,236
  6,194,310
    Termination by Executive for Good Reason  2,623,222
  687,685
  475,167
  2,408,236
  6,194,310
    Qualifying Termination Upon a Change in Control  2,623,222
  687,685
  475,167
  2,408,236
  6,194,310
the commencement or timing of payments.


 Dennis L. Klaeser   
   
   
   
   
    Retirement with Notice $
 $
 $
 $
 $
    Retirement without Notice  
  
  
  
  
    Death  
  
  
  
  
    Disability  
  
  
  
  
    For Cause Termination  
  
  
  
  
    Discretionary Resignation by Executive  
  
  
  
  
    Discretionary Termination by Corporation  2,229,077
  
  2,256,061
  
  4,485,138
    Termination by Executive for Good Reason  2,229,077
  
  2,256,061
  
  4,485,138
    Qualifying Termination Upon a Change in Control  2,229,077
  
  2,256,061
  
  4,485,138
 Lori A. Gwizdala   
   
   
   
   
    Retirement with Notice $
 $
 $1,544,400
 $
 $1,544,400
    Retirement without Notice  
  
  
  
  
    Death  
  
  346,704
  
  346,704
    Disability  
  
  346,704
  
  346,704
    For Cause Termination  
  
  
  
  
    Discretionary Resignation by Executive  
  
  
  
  
    Discretionary Termination by Corporation  1,265,980
  230,603
  1,544,400
  848,356
  3,889,339
    Termination by Executive for Good Reason  1,265,980
  230,603
  1,544,400
  848,356
  3,889,339
    Qualifying Termination Upon a Change in Control  1,265,980
  230,603
  1,544,400
  848,356
  3,889,339
Thomas W. Kohn   
   
   
   
   
    Retirement with Notice $
 $
 $402,250
 $
 $402,250
    Retirement without Notice  
  
  
  
  
    Death  
  
  312,174
  
  312,174
    Disability  
  
  312,174
  
  312,174
    For Cause Termination  
  
  
  
  
    Discretionary Resignation by Executive  
  
  
  
  
    Discretionary Termination by Corporation  338,466
  
  
  
  338,466
    Termination by Executive for Good Reason  
  
  
  
  
    Qualifying Termination Upon a Change in Control  
  239,681
  402,250
  881,698
  1,523,629
Leonardo Amat   
   
   
   
   
    Retirement with Notice $
 $
 $268,966
 $
 $268,966
    Retirement without Notice  
  
  
  
  
    Death  
  
  182,248
  
  182,248
    Disability  
  
  182,248
  
  182,248
    For Cause Termination  
  
  
  
  
    Discretionary Resignation by Executive  
  
  
  
  
    Discretionary Termination by Corporation  516,908
  217,872
  268,966
  439,427
  1,443,173
    Termination by Executive for Good Reason  516,908
  217,872
  268,966
  439,427
  1,443,173
    Qualifying Termination Upon a Change in Control  516,908
  217,872
  268,966
  439,427
  1,443,173
Robert S. Rathbun   
   
   
   
   
    Retirement with Notice $
 $
 $212,414
 $
 $212,414
    Retirement without Notice  
  
  
  
  
    Death  
  
  135,585
  
  135,585
    Disability  
  
  135,585
  
  135,585
    For Cause Termination  
  
  
  
  
    Discretionary Resignation by Executive  
  
  
  
  
    Discretionary Termination by Corporation  514,774
  217,872
  212,414
  366,027
  1,311,087
    Termination by Executive for Good Reason  514,774
  217,872
  212,414
  366,027
  1,311,087
    Qualifying Termination Upon a Change in Control  514,774
  217,872
  212,414
  366,027
  1,311,087
    Acceleration of Vesting  
Termination Scenario 
Cash Payments(1)
 
Benefits(2)
 
Stock Options(3)
 
TRSUs(4)
 
PRSUs(5)
 
Restricted Stock Awards(6)
 Total
 David T. Provost      
  
  
    
Death $
 $
 $
 $784,076
(8) 
$1,269,964
(8 
) 
$
 $2,054,040
Disability 
 
   130,679
(9) 
352,768
(9 
) 

 483,447
Without Cause 4,900,000
 26,184
 
 784,076
(8) 
1,269,964
(8 
) 
316,127
 7,296,351
Good Reason 4,900,000
 26,184
 
 784,076
(8) 
1,269,964
(8 
) 

 6,980,224
Change in Control with Qualifying Termination 4,900,000
(7) 
26,184
(7) 

 784,076
(10) 
1,269,964
(10 
) 

 6,980,224
 Dennis L. Klaeser    
  
  
  
    
Death 
 
 
 520,667
(11) 
552,213
(12 
) 
192,166
 1,265,046
Disability 
 
 
 520,667
(11) 
552,213
(12 
) 
192,166
 1,265,046
Without Cause 2,674,677
 35,000
 
 520,667
(11) 
552,213
(12 
) 
192,166
 3,974,723
Good Reason 2,674,677
 35,000
 
 520,667
(11) 
423,321
(13 
) 
192,166
 3,845,831
Qualifying Termination on a Change in Control 2,674,677
 35,000
 
 520,667
(10) 
804,831
(10 
) 
192,166
 4,227,341
Gary Torgow    
  
  
  
    
Death 
 
 
 784,076
(8) 
1,269,964
(8 
) 

 2,054,040
Disability 
 
   130,679
(9) 
352,768
(9 
) 

 483,447
Without Cause 4,900,000
 26,184
 
 784,076
(8) 
1,269,964
(8 
) 
316,127
 7,296,351
Good Reason 4,900,000
 26,184
 
 784,076
(8) 
1,269,964
(8 
) 

 6,980,224
Change in Control with Qualifying Termination 4,900,000
(7) 
26,184
(7) 

 784,076
(10) 
1,269,964
(10 
) 

 6,980,224
Thomas C. Shafer    
  
  
  
    
Death 
 
 
 390,299
(11) 
545,953
(12 
) 
192,166
 1,128,418
Disability 
 
   390,299
(11) 
545,953
(12 
) 
192,166
 1,128,418
Without Cause 3,347,667
 35,000
 
 390,299
(11) 
545,953
(12 
) 
192,166
 4,511,085
Good Reason 3,347,667
 35,000
 
 390,299
(11) 
423,321
(13 
) 
192,166
 4,388,453
Change in Control with Qualifying Termination or Good Reason Event 3,347,667
(14) 
35,000
 
 390,299
(10) 
651,983
(10 
) 
192,166
 4,617,115
J. Brennan Ryan    
  
  
  
    
Death 
 
 
 328,794
(15) 

 
 328,794
Disability 
 
   328,794
(15) 

 
 328,794
Without Cause 2,340,000
 35,000
 
 328,794
(15) 

 
 2,703,794
Good Reason 2,340,000
 35,000
 
 328,794
(15) 

 
 2,703,794
Change in Control with Qualifying Termination 2,340,000
 35,000
 
 328,794
(15) 

 
 2,703,794
(1)Represents cash payments pursuant to the executive employment agreements described above, as follows:
Mr. Provost and Mr. Torgow: two times the executive’s base salary, plus two times his average bonus of $1.5 million.

Mr. Klaeser, Mr. Shafer and Mr. Ryan: two times the executive’s base salary plus the average of the executive’s cash bonuses under our annual cash incentive plan for each of the most recent three complete calendar years (or such lesser number of completed calendar years that executive has been employed by us). For purposes of this calculation, we have included annual cash incentive payments earned in the year-ended 2018, even if not paid until 2019.

(1)(2)Pursuant to executive employment agreements, amounts reported for each named executive officer (except for Mr. Kohn) include (i) severance benefits of two times for Messrs. Ramaker and Klaeser and Ms. Gwizdala and one time for Messrs. Amat and Rathbun the sum of their annual salaryare as of December 31, 2016 and the average of their cash bonus paid in each of the last three years, payable in equal installments ranging from 52 to 104 weeks following termination of employment, (ii) an amount equal to twenty four times the Company’s monthly contribution toward health, prescription drug and dental coverage, payable in a lump sum at termination of employment, and (iii) an estimate of $9,500 related to the value to provide outplacement services for a period of up to twelve months after termination of employment. For Mr. Kohn, represents amount payable under the Company’s severance program based current salary multiplied by a factor for years of service but not to exceed one year’s salary.follows:
Mr. Provost and Mr. Torgow: a lump sum amount equal to 24 times the executive’s monthly contribution towards COBRA for employee dependent health, prescription drug and dental coverage elections under our employee benefit plans providing such benefits, minus the COBRA administrative cost.
Mr. Klaeser, Mr. Shafer and Mr. Ryan: a lump sum health care stipend in the amount of $10,000 and the value of executive-level outplacement services for a period not to exceed 12 months, estimated at $25,000.

(2)(3)
Mr. Shafer is the only named executive officer with unvested stock options; however, none were in-the-money at December 31, 2018.

(4)Amount represents the aggregate positive “spread” between the exercise price andmarket value, excluding dividend equivalents, of unvested TRSUs that would vest in connection with a termination event on December 31, 2018. The valuation of these awards is based on the closing price of Chemical Financial’sour common stock as reported on The NASDAQ Stock Market®Market® at December 31, 20162018 of $54.17$36.61 per share for unvested in-the-money stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2016.share.



(3)(5)
Amount represents the market value, excluding dividend equivalents, of unvested PRSUs that would vest in connection with a termination event on December 31, 2018. The value reported time-vested and performance-based sharevaluation of these awards is the number of shares of the Company’s common stock calculatedbased on the basis described above multiplied by the closing price of Chemical Financialour common stock as reported on The NASDAQ Stock Market® at December 31, 20162018 of $54.17$36.61 per share.
With respect to the January 4, 2017 PRSUs granted to Mr. Klaeser and Mr. Shafer for which the performance conditions were met at 90% of target at December 31, 2018, but which remained unvested at year-end, the number of shares that vested, and thus the value reflected in the table, is based on our actual performance. With respect to all other PRSUs, the number of shares that vest for each NEO, and thus the value reflected in the table, is based on an assumption that PRSUs are achieved at the “target” performance level.

(4)(6)
RestrictedAmount represents the market value of unvested restricted stock performance unitsawards that have been earned but not vested are included at the earned performance measurement and their valuewould vest in connection with a termination event on December 31, 2018. The valuation of these awards is reportedbased on this basis multiplied by the closing price of Chemical Financialour common stock as reported on The NASDAQ Stock Market® at December 31, 20162018 of $54.17$36.61 per share. For Mr. Provost and Mr. Torgow, vesting is determined under the applicable restricted stock agreement, as described above. For Mr. Klaeser and Mr. Shafer, vesting is determined under each executive’s employment agreement, as described above.

(7)Under their employment agreements, each of Mr. Provost and Mr. Torgow will receive a cash severance payment and the associated COBRA benefits described in footnote 2, above, if the executive is terminated by us without “cause” or if he terminates his employment for “good reason,” whether or not such termination follows a change in control.

(8)Represents full vesting of the TRSU or PRSU awards (as applicable) under his employment agreement, as described above.

(9)Represents pro rata vesting under the February 27, 2018 TRSU or PRSU agreement (as applicable) as described above.

(10)For purposes of this table, we have determined vesting on a qualifying termination following a change in control under the February 25, 2019 TRSU or PRSU agreement (as applicable), which also governs the treatment of prior awards.

(11)Represents full vesting of the TRSU awards under his employment agreement, as described above.

(12)Represents (a) full vesting of PRSUs granted to Mr. Klaeser and Mr. Shafer on February 27, 2018 under each executive’s employment agreement, (b) pro rata vesting of PRSUs granted under the February 21, 2017 PRSU agreements (to Mr. Klaeser and Mr. Shafer) and the August 9, 2017 PRSU agreement (to Mr. Shafer), and (c) forfeiture of PRSUs granted under the January 4, 2017 PRSU agreement (to Mr. Klaeser and Mr. Shafer).

(13)Represents (a) full vesting of PRSUs granted to Mr. Klaeser and Mr. Shafer on February 27, 2018 under each executive’s employment agreement, and (b) forfeiture of the PRSUs awarded under the February 21, 2017 PRSU agreements (to Mr. Klaeser and Mr. Shafer), the August 9, 2017 PRSU agreement (to Mr. Shafer) and the January 4, 2017 PRSU agreement (to Mr. Klaeser and Mr. Shafer).

(14)Represents the amount due to Mr. Shafer under his employment agreement if he is terminated without cause by us or if experiences a good reason event, each within two years following a change in control.

(15)Represents full vesting of the TRSUs under his July 9, 2018 TRSU agreement, as described above.

Pay Ratio

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our employees and the annual total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and President, David Provost.

For 2018, our last completed fiscal year:

The median of the total annual compensation for all employees of our company (other than our Chief Executive Officer) was $40,686; and
the total annual compensation of our Chief Executive Officer was $3,533,580, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table included elsewhere in this Proxy Statement.

Based on this information, for 2018 the ratio of the annual total compensation of Mr. Provost, our Chief Executive Officer and President, to the median of the total annual compensation was approximately 87 to 1.

To identify the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees, as well as to determine the annual total compensation of our median employee and our Chief Executive Officer, we took the following steps:

1.We determined that as of December 31, 2018, our employee population consisted of 3,224 individuals with all of these individuals located in the United States. This population included our full-time, part-time, seasonal and temporary


employees. However, it did not include independent contractors who were employed by and had their compensation determined by unaffiliated third parties.

2.To identify the “median employee” from our employee population, we compared the wages of our employees as reflected in our payroll records and reported in Box 5, Medicare Wages, to the Internal Revenue Service on Form W-2 for 2018. Because we offer a variety of compensation arrangements to our employees, including base salary, bonus, commissions and other incentive arrangements, we believe this was the most appropriate and comprehensive methodology for capturing the many different compensation arrangements we offer. We identified our median employee using this compensation measure, which was consistently applied to all of our employees included in the calculation.

3.We annualized the compensation of employees that we hired in 2018, who were not employed for the full year, by dividing their 2017 W-2 Box 5, Medicare Wages, by (a) the number of regular hours they worked in 2018, plus (b) the number of overtime hours they worked in 2018 times 1.5, and then multiplied the result by their full-time or part-time standard annual hours. We annualized compensation for part-time employees without making a full-time equivalent adjustment for part-time employees.

4.Since all of our employees are located in the United States, as is our Chief Executive Officer, we did not make any cost-of-living adjustments in identifying our “median employee.”

5.Once we identified our median employee, we combined all of the elements of such employee’s compensation for 2018 in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K, resulting in annual total compensation of $40,686.

6.With respect to the annual total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, we used the amount reported in the “Total” column of our Summary Compensation Table included in this Proxy Statement.

Director Compensation
Effective May 1, 2018, the board of directors implemented changes to our director compensation program in light of the completion of the Talmer merger and integration and our ongoing growth, which has significantly increased our size and complexity and subjected us to enhanced regulatory requirements and scrutiny. We engaged Aon to perform a market analysis of director compensation for a financial institution of our size, compared to our 2018 peer group. After reviewing this market analysis, the Committee determined that to enable it to continue to retain and recruit qualified directors, it was in our best interest to revise the board of director compensation program, as follows.
The annual cash retainer was increased from $45,000 to $50,000.
The annual equity retainer value was increased from a grant date fair value of $45,000 to a grant date fair value of $80,813.
Certain Committee service stipends were amended to bring more consistency to the Committee service component of our director pay program.


Director Compensation
During 2016, Chemical Financial compensated its directors who were not employeesThe following terms represent the structure of Chemical Financial with an annual retainer of $20,000 and additional annual retainers of $15,000 for service as the lead independentour director and $5,000 for service as a committee chair (each paid in a mix of cash and stock, as discussed in more detail below). Chemical Financialcompensation program.
 Effective prior to May 1, 2018 Effective May 1, 2018
Annual Cash Retainer$45,000 $50,000
Annual Equity Retainer$45,000 $80,813
Lead Independent Director Retainer$25,000 $30,000
Annual Cash Retainers for Audit Committee ServiceChair – $20,000
Member – $10,000
 Chair – $25,000
Member – $12,500
Annual Cash Retainers for ALCO and Risk Management CommitteeChair – $10,000
Member – $5,000
 Chair – $20,000
Member – $7,500
Annual Cash Retainers for Compensation and Pension Committee ServiceChair – $15,000
Member – $7,500
 Chair – $20,000
Member – $10,000
Per Meeting Cash Retainer for BSA Committee ServiceNot Applicable $750 per meeting
Annual Cash Retainers for Service on All Other Board CommitteesChair – $10,000
Member – $5,000
 Chair – $15,000
Member – $7,500
For 2018, non-employee directors were also compensated atrequired to elect the rateform of $1,000delivery of their cash retainers from three alternatives: (1) Directors’ Deferred Stock Plan (DDSP) units, (2) cash, or (3) a combination of DDPS units and cash. Mr. Klein, Ms. Mahone and Mr. Wheatlake elected to $1,250 for each boardreceive all cash retainers in the form of cash. Mr. Pelizzari elected to receive his committee service retainers in the form of DDSP units, but other retainers in cash. The other non-employee directors meeting attended, atelected to receive their both their annual cash retainers and committee service retainers in the rateform of $750 for each committee meeting attended, and at the rate of $1,000 for certain special meetings and training sessions held on an as needed basis. Chemical Financial directors who also served as a director of Chemical Bank were compensated with an additional $10,000 retainer, $3,000 for service as a committee chair, $1,000 for each Chemical Bank board of directors meeting attended, $750 for every Chemical Bank Loan Committee meeting attended and $550 for each other Chemical Bank committee meeting attended, as applicable.DDSP units.
Chemical Financial and Chemical BankOur directors who are employees are not entitled to any additional compensation related to their service as a director. For 2016,2018, this included Messrs. Lievense,Mr. Provost, RamakerMr. Shafer and Mr. Torgow.
On April 21, 2008, the shareholders approved the Chemical Financial Corporation Directors’ Deferred Stock Plan (DDSP), authorizing the issuance of up to 400,000 shares of Chemical Financialour common stock. The DDSP provides benefits to our non-employee directors of Chemical Financial and Chemical Bank in the form of an equity retainer that is required to be deferred annually and invested in stock units representing shares of Chemical Financialour common stock. The equity retainer is 50% of the annual retainer of each non-employee director, or such greater percentage as determined by the board of directors. The annual retainer is a lump-sum amount paid to each non-employee director for the director’s service throughout the year. The difference between the annual retainer and the equity retainer is the cash retainer. The DDSP allows each non-employee director to voluntarily defer thetheir annual cash retainer and/or all director and/or community advisory director fees and invest these retainers in stock units representing shares of Chemical Financialour common stock. The amount of the annual retainer,cash and equity retainers in addition to the director and community advisory directorcommittee service fees contributed to the DDSP are vested immediately. The deferral election must be made before the beginning of a plan year. The DDSP is an unfunded supplemental nonqualified deferred compensation plan that complies with Internal Revenue Code Section 409A.
The equity retainer and any cash retainer voluntarily contributed to the DDSP are converted to stock units on the date paid. Any director and community advisory director fees that are voluntarily contributed to the DDSP are converted to stock units on the date Chemical Financial pays itswe pay our next quarterly cash dividend. The number of stock units credited to each participating director’s account is determined by dividing the dollar amount of the equity retainer and any deferred cash retainer by the market value of a single share of Chemical Financialour common stock on the date the annual retainer is paid, and by dividing the dollar amount of any deferred director and community advisory director fees by the market value of a single share of Chemical Financialour common stock on the next quarterly cash dividend payment date. Each participating director’s account is also credited with dividend equivalents on each date Chemical Financial payswe pay cash dividends. Dividend equivalents are a number of stock units equal to the number of shares of common stock that have a market value equal to the amount of any cash dividends that would have been paid to a shareholder owning the number of shares of common stock represented by stock units in a participating director’s account on each cash dividend payment date.
Distributions will be made in our common stock of Chemical Financial equal to the number of stock units in the participating director’s account. Any fractional shares will be paid in cash. Distributions will not be made until a director retires or terminates service as a director or upon the death of the director or a change in control of Chemical Financial.the Corporation. For common stock issued upon a director’s retirement from or termination of service, the director has a choice to receive the shares in a lump-sum or in five annual installments. A director must make an irrevocable election between the lump-sum and five annual installments at the time the director begins participating in the DDSP. The election is irrevocable and applies to all future deferral elections. Upon a change in control of Chemical Financial(as defined in the DDPS) or death of the director, shares will be issued in a lump-sum. Chemical FinancialWe may also permit a distribution to a participating director due to an unforeseeable emergency.
Messrs.

Mr. Fitterling, Mr. Lievense, Ms. McQuade, Mr. Pelizzari, Mr. Stauffer, Mr. Tate and Mr. Weiss made voluntary contributions to the DDSP during 2016.2018.

As a result of the Talmer merger, a change in control of Chemical Financial occurred under the DDSP, which caused all deferred compensation and dividend equivalents accumulated under the DDSP through August 31, 2016 to become payable in a lump-sum distribution.
Effective May 1, 2017, the board of directors will implement changes to director compensation in light of the completion of the Talmer merger. The board of directors believes the changes to director compensation are warranted for several reasons. The Corporation is significantly larger in size following the Talmer merger and, as a result of crossing $10 billion in total assets, is subject to enhanced regulatory requirements and scrutiny. As such, it is expected that directors and members of committees of the board of directors will be required to spend an increasing amount of time in their role as a director or committee member of the Corporation. In addition, the Corporation has entered into a new peer group for purposes of comparing compensation plans


and practices, as well as corporate performance. The Corporation engaged Aon Hewitt to perform a benchmarking analysis of director compensation against the Corporation’s 2017 peer group.This analysis demonstrated that total director compensation at the Corporation is 62% below that of the peer group median. In order to retain and to continue to be able to recruit qualified directors for the Corporation, the board of directors believes director compensation must be more competitive with the peer group.

Director compensation for Chemical Financial will be as follows beginning May 1, 2017: all board of directors and board committee meeting attendance fees will be eliminated. Instead, directors will be compensated on a retainer-only basis:

Annual Retainer
$90,000

($45,000 equity retainer; $45,000 cash retainer)
Committee Chair Annual Cash RetainersAudit Committee – $20,000
Compensation and Pension Committee – $15,000
Risk Management Committee – $15,000
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee – $10,000
Committee Member Annual Cash RetainersAudit Committee – $10,000
Compensation and Pension Committee – $7,500
Risk Management Committee – $7,500
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee – $5,000
Lead Independent Director Annual Cash Retainer$25,000

In addition, Chemical Financial directors who also serve as a director of Chemical Bank will receive an additional annual retainer of $20,000 for service as a bank director, except that any Chemical Financial director that also serves on Chemical Bank’s loan committee will receive an additional annual retainer of $25,000.
As discussed above, the annual equity retainer will be required to be deferred annually and invested in stock units representing shares of Chemical Financial common stock pursuant to the DDSP.  All or any portion of the annual cash retainer, the committee chair annual cash retainer, the committee member annual cash retainer and the Lead Independent Director annual cash retainer, as applicable, may be voluntarily deferred and invested in stock units representing shares of Chemical Financial common stock pursuant to the DDSP.  Directors may also elect to receive awards of restricted stock under the 2017 Stock Plan in lieu of payment of the cash portion of the directors’ compensation.




20162018 Director Compensation
The following table sets forth the compensation paid to our non-employee Chemical Financial directors for services rendered during 2016:2018:
Name
Fees
Earned
or Paid
in Cash(1)
Stock
Awards(2)
Option
Awards
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
All Other
Compensation(3)
Total
Fees
Earned
or Paid
in Cash(1)
Stock
Awards(2)
Option
Awards
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
All Other
Compensation(3)
 Total
       
Gary E. Anderson$34,000
$10,000
 $4,013
$48,103
James R. Fitterling35,250
12,500
 7,628
55,378
$105,000
$80,813
$
$
$
$6,930
 $192,743
Ronald A. Klein(4)
17,425
6,800
 
24,225
Ronald A. Klein86,250
80,813



2,712
 169,775
Richard M. Lievense105,000
80,813



4,853
(4) 
190,666
Barbara J. Mahone(4)
18,363
6,800
 
25,163
81,250
80,813



4,918
 166,981
Terence F. Moore(5)
12,750

 1,338
14,088
Barbara L. McQuade(5)
77,500
80,813
 2,678
 160,991
John E. Pelizzari70,350
15,000
 1,733
87,083
100,500
80,813



9,516
 190,829
Larry D. Stauffer48,350
17,500
 17,203
83,053
88,000
80,813



7,760
 176,573
Arthur A. Weiss(4)
15,550
6,800
 
22,350
Jeffrey L. Tate82,500
80,813



5,854
 169,167
Arthur A. Weiss100,000
80,813



6,912
 187,725
Franklin C. Wheatlake59,800
27,500
 4,582
91,882
95,000
80,813



2,552
 178,365
(1)Represents the aggregate dollar amount of all fees earned or paid in cash for services as a director, of Chemical Financial and Chemical Bank, including the cash retainer, committee and/or committee chair fees, lead independent director fee, and meeting and community advisory director fees, including any fees voluntarily deferred under the DDSP. Voluntary deferrals of the cash retainer and other fees into the DDSP in 20162018 were as follows: $35,250$105,000 by Mr. Fitterling, $19,250$105,000 by Mr. Lievense, $77,500 by Ms. McQuade, $97,500 by Mr. Pelizzari, $48,350$85,000 by Mr. Stauffer, $82,500 by Mr. Tate and $10,550$100,000 by Mr. Weiss.
(2)Represents the grant date fair value computed in accordance with ASC 718. The amounts reported represent one-half of the annual retainerequity retainers paid to each director in 20162018 and deferred and invested in stock units representing shares of Chemical Financialour common stock (i.e., the equity retainer).stock. The aggregate number of stock awards earned by each director for services, voluntary contributions made by the director to the DDSP and dividend equivalents credited to each director’s DDSP participant account since becoming a director and/or subsequent to the lump-sum distribution, if applicable, is represented by the number in the column titled “Stock Units” set forth in the table under the heading “Ownership of Chemical Financial Common Stock by Directors and Executive Officers” and such information is here incorporated by reference.
(3)Represents dividend equivalents paid in 20162018 on stock units in the DDSP.DDSP as well as community advisory fees paid in 2018. As permitted by SEC regulation, perquisites that in the aggregate total less than $10,000 are not included.
(4)AppointedDoes not include $40,000 in independent contractor fees paid by Chemical Bank to the board of directors effective August 31, 2016.Geld Capital, LLC, which is principally owned by Mr. Lievense, as described in “Transactions with Related Persons” below.
(5)Mr. Moore retired fromElected to the board of directors effective at the 2016 annual meeting.April 25, 2018.




Other Matters
Transactions with Related Persons
Statement of Policy Regarding Transactions with Related Persons
Transactions by us with related parties are subject to review by our audit committee, as well as regulatory requirements and restrictions. These requirements and restrictions include Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act (which govern certain transactions by us with our affiliates) and the Federal Reserve's Regulation O (which governs certain loans by us to our executive officers, directors and principal shareholders). We have also adopted policies to comply with these regulatory requirements and restrictions. In addition, our Audit Committee reviews and approves all transactions between Chemical and related persons which are required to be reported under SEC Regulation S-K, Item 404.
Geld Capital, LLC
Chemical Bank entered into an independent contractor agreement, effective July 1, 2018, with Geld Capital, LLC, which is principally owned by one of our directors, Richard Lievense. Under the agreement, Geld Capital, LLC will provide certain services to Insite Capital, LLC, a subsidiary of Chemical, for a fee of $40,000 per calendar quarter, during the term of the agreement. Unless earlier terminated, the agreement will terminate on September 30, 2019.
28 Associates LLC

Chemical Bank, currently headquartered in downtown Detroit, previously announced its planned expansion in the city, including approximately 500 jobs to be located there once it moves into a new headquarters building. On March 27, 2019, Chemical Bank and 28 Associates LLC, a Michigan limited liability company, entered into a letter agreement regarding the development and lease of a new headquarters building for Chemical Bank in Detroit. The parties have been in negotiations with respect to this property owned by 28 Associates since the third quarter of 2018. The development of this property on a high-profile lot located directly in the heart of Detroit’s entertainment and commercial district, will be one of the first commercial high-rise buildings to be constructed in Detroit in decades. This project is a fundamental component of Chemical’s commitment to participate in the revitalization of the City of Detroit and capitalize as a commercial bank on its strategic effort to be Detroit’s “Hometown Bank,” and build crucial deposit and loan relationships with key commercial and municipal customers in the market, including the City of Detroit. Chemical Bank remains fully committed to this effort. 28 Associates is 50% owned by the five adult children of Chemical’s Chairman, Gary Torgow, through their ownership of a member of 28 Associates, Park Elizabeth Associates LLC. The members of Park Elizabeth Associates are Elie Torgow, Yoni Torgow, Rachel H. Torgow Krakauer, Moshe Torgow, and Jacob Torgow. Mr. Torgow recused himself from all Board deliberations related to this agreement, and none of these adult children are directors, officers or employees of Chemical or Chemical Bank. The Audit Committee of the Board (of which Mr. Torgow is not a member) also approved this letter agreement. Elie Torgow is also the manager of 28 Associates and owns less than .01% of Chemical. The approximate aggregate value of the interest of Mr. Torgow’s children in the development and lease transaction is equal to approximately 50% of the amounts payable to 28 Associates thereunder. The letter agreement provides for the parties to enter into a development and lease transaction to include a triple net lease by Chemical of a proposed office building at the initial rate of $35 per rentable square foot for office space, or approximately $6,977,950 annually, and $50 per rentable square foot for retail space, or approximately $190,050 annually, with two percent annual increases during the initial term. The lease will have a term of 22.5 years and a rent commencement date of January 1, 2022. Chemical Bank has four renewal options of 84 months for each renewal option. The leased property will be approximately 421,481 square feet of gross area comprised of (a) a 203,171 square-foot building containing approximately (i) 199,370 square feet of rentable office space and (ii) 3,801 rentable square feet of 1st floor retail space, and (b) a parking garage and related parking facilities, including without limitation, 311 parking spaces. The four renewal terms will be at 95% fair market rental, with two percent annual increases, provided the base rent during each renewal term shall not be less than the immediately preceding lease year before commencement of each renewal term. 28 Associates, which owns the property, will remediate and improve the property and build the office building. Chemical Bank and 28 Associates have agreed to cooperate to seek critical tax incentives from governmental agencies, which will be for the benefit of the developer and Chemical Bank. Conditions to closing include receipt of tax incentives as well as guaranteed construction cost agreements on terms acceptable to the landlord and the tenant. ChemicalBank will lease the 311 parking spaces within the premises at an estimated monthly cost of $300 per spot, or $1,119,600 annually, provided that up to 60 parking spaces may be subleased back by 28 Associates for the same amount, reducing the net leased parking spaces to 251, or by $216,000 annually. Chemical Bank will also retain all parking rental income realized at the property from event parking rental services. If the parties do not enter into a final lease agreement with respect to the property, or if the parties do not receive the contemplated tax incentives by September 30, 2019, Chemical Bank has agreed to pay 28 Associates a break-up fee of $6 million, as 28 Associates has held the property off of the market since the third quarter of 2018, commenced the termination of tenants in an existing building on the site and incurred expenses associated with site preparation and negotiations as Chemical Bank has completed its due diligence.



Other relationships
Directors, officers, principal shareholders and their associates and family members were customers of, and had transactions (including loans and loan commitments) with, Chemical Bank in the ordinary course of business during 2016.2018. All such loans and commitments were made in the ordinary course of business, on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with persons not related to the CorporationChemical and did not involve more than a normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features. Similar transactions may be expected to take place in the ordinary course of business in the future. None of these loan relationships presently in effect were in defaultdisclosed as nonaccrual, past due, restructured or potential problems as of the date of this proxy statement. The Audit Committee reviews and approves all transactions between the Corporation and related persons which are required to be reported under Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-K, Item 404.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our directors and certain officers of Chemical Financial and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of theour outstanding shares of Chemical Financial’s common stock to file reports of beneficial ownership and changes in beneficial ownership of shares of our common stock with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC. SEC regulations require such persons to furnish Chemical Financialus with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file. Based solely on our review of the copies of such reports furnished to us or written representations from certain reporting persons that no Forms 5 were required for those persons, we believe that all applicable Section 16(a) reporting and filing requirements were satisfied on a timely basis by such persons from January 1, 20162018 through December 31, 2016.2018.
Shareholder Proposals
A Chemical shareholder seeking to present a proposal at a Chemicalour annual meeting of shareholders must submit a notice to theour Corporate Secretary of Chemical in accordance with Chemical’sour bylaws not less than 120 calendar days prior to the date corresponding to the date of Chemical’sour proxy statement or notice of meeting released to shareholders in connection with the last preceding annual meeting of shareholders, in the case of an annual meeting (unless Chemicalwe did not hold an annual meeting within the last year, or if the date of the upcoming annual meeting changed by more than 30 days from the date of the last preceding meeting, then the notice must be delivered or mailed and received not more than 10 days after the earlier of the date of the notice of the meeting or public disclosure of the date of the meeting), and not more than ten days after the earlier of the date of the notice of the meeting or public disclosure of the date of the meeting, in the case of a special meeting. A Chemical shareholder seeking to include a proposal in Chemical’sour proxy statement and form of proxy relating to a meeting of shareholders must submit the proposal to Chemicalus in accordance with SEC Rule 14a-8. With respect to Chemical’s 2018our 2020 annual meeting of shareholders, the deadline to submit a notice of a proposal and to include a proposal in Chemical’sour proxy statement and form of proxy relating to the meeting is November 10, 2017.27, 2019.
A Chemical shareholder seeking to nominate an individual for election as a director of Chemical director must submit a notice to theour Corporate Secretary of Chemical in accordance with the Chemicalour Bylaws not less than 120 days prior to the date of the meeting, in the case of an annual meeting, and not more than seven days following the date of notice of the meeting, in the case of a special meeting.

Solicitation of Proxies
Directors,Our directors, officers and employees of Chemical Financial and itsour affiliates will initially solicit proxies by mail.mail and over the Internet. They also may solicit proxies in person, by telephone or by other means, but they will not receive any additional compensation for these efforts. Nominees, trustees and other fiduciaries who hold stock on behalf of beneficial owners of Chemical Financialour common stock may communicate with the beneficial owners by mail or otherwise and may forward proxy materials to and solicit proxies from the beneficial owners. Chemical FinancialWe will pay all costs of solicitation of proxies. Chemical Financial has engaged Georgeson Shareholder Communications, Inc. at an estimated fee of $1,200, plus out-of-pocket expenses, to assist in the distribution of these materials. We will also solicit proxies by telephone and the Internet. See the enclosed proxy for instructions.


Important Notice Regarding Delivery of Shareholder Documents
As permitted by Securities and Exchange CommissionThe SEC has adopted rules only one copythat permit companies to satisfy the delivery requirements for proxy statements, annual reports or Notice of this 2017Internet Availability of Proxy Statement and the 2016 Annual ReportMaterials with respected to Shareholders is being delivered to multipletwo or more shareholders sharing the same address by delivering a single proxy statement, annual report or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials addressed to those shareholder, unless Chemical Financial haswe have received contrary instructions from one or more of the shareholders who share the same address. We will deliver on a one-time basis, promptly upon written or oral request from a shareholder at a shared address, a separate copy of our 20172019 Proxy Statement, and the 20162018 Annual Report to Shareholders.Shareholders and Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. Requests should be made to Chemical’s Investor Relations at Investor Relations, Chemical Financial Corporation, Attn: Dennis L. Klaeser, Chief Financial Officer, 235 E. Main333 W. Fort Street, Midland,Suite 1800, Detroit, Michigan 48640,48226, telephone (989) 839-5350.(800) 867-9757. Shareholders sharing an address who are currently receiving multiple copies of the proxy statement, and annual report to shareholders and Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials may instruct us to deliver a single copy of such documents on an ongoing basis. Such instructions must be in writing, must be signed by each shareholder who is currently receiving a separate copy of the documents, must be addressed to Chemical’s Investor Relations at Investor Relations, Chemical Financial Corporation, Attn: Dennis L. Klaeser, Chief Financial Officer, 235 E. Main333 W. Fort Street, Midland,Suite 1800, Detroit, Michigan 48640,48226, and will continue in effect unless and until we receive contrary instructions as provided below. Any shareholder sharing an address may request to receive and instruct us to send separate copies of the proxy statement, and annual report to shareholders and Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials on an ongoing basis by written or verbal request to Chemical’s Investor Relations at Investor Relations, Chemical Financial Corporation, Attn: Dennis L. Klaeser, Chief Financial Officer, 235 E. Main333 W. Fort Street, Midland,Suite 1800, Detroit, Michigan 48640,48226, telephone (989) 839-5350.(800) 867-9757. We will begin sending separate copies of such documents within thirty days of receipt of such instructions.
Availability of Information
Chemical Financial’sOur combined 20162018 Annual Report to Shareholders and Form 10-K Annual Report, including financial statements and financial statement schedules, but not the exhibits to the Form 10-K, and the 20172019 Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement are available on the following website, www.edocumentview.com/chfcwww.proxydocs.com/CHFC or through the United States Securities and Exchange Commission’sSEC's website at www.sec.gov. This information may be obtained without charge upon written request to Chemical Financial Corporation. Please direct your requests to Chemical’s Investor Relations at Investor Relations, Chemical Financial Corporation, 235 E. Main333 W. Fort Street, Midland,Suite 1800, Detroit, Michigan 48640, Attn: Dennis L. Klaeser, Chief Financial Officer.48226. Copies of exhibits to the Form 10-K may be requested at the cost of 30 cents per page from the Corporation.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
dramakera04.jpg
David B. Ramaker
Chief Executive Officer and President

 
Your vote is important.
Even if you plan to attend the meeting,
PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY PROMPTLY OR
VOTE BY TELEPHONE OR THE INTERNET.







APPENDIX A

CHEMICAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION
STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN OF 20172019

SECTION 1

Establishment of Plan; Purpose of Plan

1.1    Establishment of Plan. The Company hereby establishes the STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN OF 20172019 for its corporate and Subsidiary directors,Directors, officers and other key employees.Employees. The Plan permits the grant and award of Stock Options, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Stock Awards and other stock-based and stock-related awards; provided, that directors are only eligibleawards to participate in the Plan with respect to Restricted Stock awards made in lieu of paymentEmployees and non-employee Directors of the cash portionCompany or any of the director’s compensation.its Subsidiaries.

1.2    Purpose of Plan. The purpose of the Plan is to provide Participants with an increased incentive to contribute to the long-term performance and growth of the Company and its Subsidiaries, to join the interests of Participants with the interests of the Company’s shareholders through the opportunity for increased stock ownership and to attract and retain Participants. The Plan is further intended to provide flexibility to the Company in structuring long-term incentive compensation and performance-based compensation to best promote the foregoing objectives. Within that context, it is intended that the Plan may provide performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code and the Plan shall be interpreted, administered and amended to achieve that purpose.


SECTION 2

Definitions

The following words have the following meanings set forth below unless a different meaning plainly is required by the context:

2.1    “Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

2.2Affiliate” means any organization controlling, controlled by or under common control with the Company.

2.3Board” means the Board of Directors of the Company.

2.4Cause” means, unless otherwise provided in an Equity-Based Award Agreement, (x) “Cause” as defined in an Individual Agreement to which the Participant is a party, or (y) if there is no such Individual Agreement or if it does not define Cause: (a) conviction of, or plea of guilty or nolo contendere by Participant for committing a felony under federal law or the law of the state in which such action occurred; (b) willful and deliberate failure on the part of Participant in the performance of his or her employment duties or director duties in any material respect; (c) dishonesty in the course of fulfilling Participant’s employment duties or director duties; (d) the Participant’s material violation of an ethics and compliance program, code of conduct or other material policy of the Company or its Subsidiaries; or (e) prior to a Change in Control, such other events as shall be determined by the Committee. Following a Change in Control, any determination by the Committee as to whether “Cause” exists shall be subject to de novo review.

2.5    Change in Control,” unless otherwise defined in an IncentiveEquity-Based Award agreement, means anAgreement, shall be limited to the Company and defined as the occurrence of a nature that would be required to be reported in response to Item 6(e) of Schedule 14A of Regulation 14A issued under the Act. Without limiting the inclusivenessany of the definition infollowing events: (a) a Person or Persons acting as a group, acquires (or has acquired during the preceding sentence, a Change in Control12-month period ending on the last acquisition) stock of the Company shall be deemed to have occurred asthat together with stock held by such Person or group constitutes more than 40% of the first day that any one or more of the following conditions is satisfied: (a) any Person is or becomes the "beneficial owner" (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing 25% or more of the combinedtotal voting power of the Company’s then outstanding securities;stock; (b) the failure at any timeconsummation of the Continuing Directors to constitute at least a majority of the Board; or (c) any of the following occur: (i) any merger or consolidation of the Company with any other than acorporation, if such merger or consolidation results in which the outstanding voting securities of the Company immediately prior tothereto representing 60% or less of the merger or consolidation continue to represent (either by remainingtotal outstanding or being converted intovoting securities of the surviving entity) 50%entity immediately after such merger or moreconsolidation; (c) a majority of the combined voting power members of the Company’s Board are replaced during any 12-month period by Directors whose appointment or election is not endorsed by a majority of the members of the Board prior to the date of such appointment or election; or (d) the acquisition, by a Person or Persons acting as a group, of the Company’s assets that have a total gross fair market value equal to or exceeding 40% of the total gross fair market value of the Company’s assets in a single transaction or within a 12-month period ending with the most recent acquisition. Gross fair market value means the value of the Company’s assets, or the value of the assets being disposed of, determined without regard to any liabilities associated with such assets. No trust department or designated beneficiary or other trustee of such trust department




of the Company or surviving entity immediately aftera Subsidiary of the merger or consolidation with another entity; (ii) any sale, exchange, lease, mortgage, pledge, transferCorporation, or other disposition (in a single transaction or a series of related transactions) of assets or earning power aggregating more than 50% of the assets or earning powersimilar fiduciary capacity of the Company on a consolidated basis; (iii) any complete liquidation or dissolutionwith direct voting control of the Company; (iv) any reorganization, reverse stock splitshall be treated as a Person or recapitalizationgroup within the meaning of subparagraph (a) hereof. Further, no profit sharing, employee stock ownership, employee stock purchase and savings, employee pension or other employee benefit plan of the Company which would resultor any of its Subsidiaries, and no trustee of any such plans in its capacity as such trustee, shall be treated as a Person or group within the meaning of subparagraph (a) hereof. For the avoidance of doubt, and notwithstanding any provision in the definition of Change in Control to the contrary, in the event that any Equity Award constitutes deferred compensation, and the settlement of, or distribution of benefits under such Equity Award is to be triggered by a Change in Control, as otherwise definedthen such settlement or distribution shall be subject to the event constituting the Change in this Plan; or (v) any transaction or series of related transactions having, directly or indirectly, the same effect as any of the foregoing.Control also constituting a “change in control event” under Code Section 409A.

2.52.6    Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Each reference in this Plan to a section or sections of the Code, unless otherwise noted, shall be deemed to include a reference to the rules and regulations issued under such section or sections of the Code.

2.62.7    Committee” means the Compensation and Pension Committee of the Board or such other committee as the Board may designate from time to time. The Committee shall consist of at least two members of the Board. The Board andintends for all of itsthe Committee members




shall to be “non-employee directors” as defined in Rule 16b-3 issued under the Act and “outside directors”independent directors as definedset forth in Section 162(m) of the Code.NASDAQ Marketplace Rules with respect to compensation committee members.

2.72.8    Common Stock” means the Company’s common stock, par value $1$1.00 per share.

2.82.9    Company” means Chemical Financial Corporation, a Michigan corporation, and its successors and assigns.

2.92.10        “Continuing Directors” means the individuals who were either (a) first elected or appointed as a director prior to February 20, 2017, or (b) subsequently appointed as a director, if appointed or nominated by at least a majority of the Continuing Directors in office at the time of the nomination or appointment, but specifically excluding any individual whose initial assumption of office occurs as a result of either an actual or threatened solicitation subject to Rule 14a-12(c) of Regulation 14A issued under the Act or other actual or threatened solicitation of proxies or consents by or on behalf of a Person other than the Board.
2.10    “Covered Employee” means any Employee who is or may become a “Covered Employee,” as defined in Section 162(m) of the Code, and who is designated, either as an individual Employee or class of Employees, by the Committee within the shorter of (i) 90 days after the beginning of the Performance Period, or (ii) the period of time after the beginning of the Performance Period and before 25% of the Performance Period has elapsed, as a “Covered Employee” under this Plan for such applicable Performance Period.
2.11Director” means a member of the Board.

2.122.11    Disability” means an inability of a Participant to perform his or her employment or directorDirector duties due to physical or mental disability for a continuous period of 180 days or longer and the Participant is eligible for benefits under the Company’s long-term disability policy.policy of the Company or a Subsidiary.

2.132.12    Employee” means an employee (including an officer who is an employee) of the Company or one of its Subsidiaries or Affiliates.Subsidiaries.

2.142.13    Equity-Based Award” means the award or grant of a Stock Option, Restricted Stock, a Restricted Stock Unit, a Stock Award, or another stock-based or stock-related award, to a Participant pursuant to the Plan.

2.152.14    Equity-Based Award Agreement” means the written agreement with the Company and/or certificate of award issued by the Company (including any amendment or supplement thereto) that evidences and contains the terms and conditions of an Equity-Based Award awarded or granted under the Plan. Such document shall be referred to as an Equity-Based Award Agreement regardless of whether a Participant’s signature is required.

2.15    Good Reason” means a Participant terminates employment due to a material negative change to the employment relationship between the Participant and the Company because: (a) the Participant is removed fromoccurrence of any of the Participant’s principal positions; (b)following events without the status, authority or responsibilitywritten consent of the Participant’s principal positions is materially diminished; (c)Participant: (a) any material reduction in the Participant’s base salary, as then in effect is materially reducedit may be adjusted from time to time, without a corresponding reduction in the base salaries of other similarly situated Participants; (b) any material reduction in the Company’s other executives, (d)Participant’s status, position or responsibilities; or (c) any requirement by the Company requiresor any one of its Subsidiaries (without the Participant’s consent) that the Participant be principally based in a facility that isat any office or location more than sixty (60) miles from the facility whereParticipant’s principal work location as of the effective date of the Equity-Based Award Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Good Reason event shall not be deemed to have occurred if the Participant’s positions or responsibilities change in a manner that overall constitute an enhanced position or one or more different positions with the same or greater aggregate responsibilities. Further, if the Participant is located immediately priorfails to the relocation or any substantial increase in the business travel required of the Participant; or (e) any material breach bygive the Company, or its Subsidiary, as applicable, written notice of his or her intention to terminate employment with such entity for Good Reason within ninety (90) days following the Participant’s first knowledge of any successor,Good Reason event and a period of sixty (60) days in which the Company, or its obligationsSubsidiary, as applicable, may remedy the event alleged to constitute Good Reason, and if the Participant under this Plan. Ahas not terminated his or her employment within thirty (30) days following the expiration of the Company’s, or its Subsidiary’s, as applicable, foregoing cure period, the event shall not constitute Good Reason, and the Participant may notshall have no right to terminate employment for “Good Reason” unless: (i) the Participant notifies the Company’s CEO in writing, within 60 days after the Participant becomes aware of the act or omission constituting Good Reason that the act or omission in question constitutes Good Reason and explaining why the Participant considers it to constitute Good Reason; (ii) the Company fails, within 30 days after notice from the Participant under (i) above, to revoke the action or correct the omission and make the Participant whole; and (iii) the Participant gives noticeas a result of termination within 30 days after expiration of the 30-day period under (ii) above.such event.

2.16Individual Agreement” means (a) any employment, change in control or severance agreement between the Participant and the Company or one of its Subsidiaries (or any successor thereto) and (b) any retention agreement between the Participant and the Company or one of its Subsidiaries (or any successor thereto) that becomes effective on or following February 25, 2019.


2.17    Market Value” shall equal the closing market price of shares of Common Stock reported on NASDAQ (or any successor exchange or system that is the primary stock exchange or system for trading of Common Stock) on the date of grant, exercise or vesting, as applicable, or if NASDAQ (or any such successor) is closed on that date, the lastnext preceding date on which NASDAQ (or any such successor) was open for trading and on which shares of Common Stock were traded. If the Common Stock is not readily tradable on an established securities market, the Market Value shall be determined by any means deemed fair and reasonable by the Committee, taking into account such factors as it considers advisable in a manner consistent with the valuation principles of Section 409A of the Code, except when the Committee expressly determines not to use Section 409A valuation principles, which determination shall be final and binding on all parties.

2.172.18    NASDAQ” means The NASDAQ Stock Market.

2.182.19    Participant” means aany corporate officerEmployee or any key employee of the Company or its SubsidiariesDirector who is granted an Equity-Based Award under the Plan. A director of the Company or its Subsidiaries may also be a “Participant” but only with respect to Restricted Stock awards made in lieu of payment of the cash portion of the director’s compensation.



2.192.20    Performance” means the level of achievement of the performance goals established by the Committee pursuant to Section 9.1.

2.202.21    Performance Measures” means measures as described in Section 9 on which the performance goals are based.

2.212.22    Performance Period” means the period of time during which the performance goals must be met to determine the degree of payout, the vesting, or both, with respect to an Equity-Based Award that is intendeddeemed by the Committee to qualifybe as Performance-Based Compensation.Compensation under Section 9 of the Plan.

2.222.23    Performance-Based Compensation” means compensation under an Equity-Based Award that satisfiesis subject to performance-based vesting conditions as defined in Section 9 and granted under the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code for certain “performance-based compensation” paid to Covered Employees. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in this Plan shall be construed to mean that an Equity-Based(a “Performance-Based Award which does not satisfy the requirements for performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code does not constitute performance-based compensation for other purposes, including Section 409A of the Code.”).

2.232.24    Person” has the same meaning as set forth in Sections 13(d) and 14(d)(2) of the Act.

2.242.25    Plan” means the Chemical Financial Corporation Stock Incentive Plan of 20172019 as set forth herein, as it may be amended from time to time.

2.252.26    Prior Plans” means the Chemical Financial Corporation Stock Incentive Plan of 2017, the Chemical Financial Corporation Stock Incentive Plan of 2015 and the Chemical Financial Corporation Stock Incentive Plan of 2012.

2.262.27    Restricted Period” means the period of time during which Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units or other stock-based or stock-related awards that are awarded under the Plan are subject to the risk of forfeiture, restrictions on transfer and other restrictions or conditions pursuant to Sections 6, 7, or 7.8. The Restricted Period may differ among Participants and may have different expiration dates with respect to shares of Common Stock covered by the same Equity-Based Award.

2.272.28    Restricted Stock” means Common Stock awarded to a Participant pursuant to Section 6 of the Plan while such Common Stock remains subject to the risk of forfeiture, restrictions on transfer and other restrictions or conditions pursuant to Section 6.

2.282.29    Restricted Stock Unit” means an award to a Participant pursuant to Section 6 of the Plan and described as a “Restricted Stock Unit” in Section 6.

2.292.30    Retirementfor an Employee means the voluntary terminationTermination of all employment bywith the ParticipantCompany and its Subsidiaries after the ParticipantEmployee has attained 55 years of age and completed 10 years of service with the Company or anyone of its Subsidiaries or as otherwise may be set forth in the Equity-Based Award agreementAgreement or other grant document with respect to a Participant and a particular Equity-Based Award. “Retirement” for a directorDirector means the cessationCessation of the director’sDirector’s service on the Board at the end of the director’sDirector’s term on the Board when the directorDirector is not nominated for reelection, to the Board, or as otherwise may be set forth in the Equity-Based Award agreementAgreement or other grant document with respect to a Participant and a particular Equity-Based Award.

2.302.31    Stock Award” means an award of Common Stock awarded to a Participant pursuant to Section 7 of the Plan.

2.312.32    Stock Option” means the right to purchase Common Stock at a stated price for a specified period of time. For purposes of the Plan, a Stock Option may only be a nonqualified stock option.



2.322.33    Subsidiary” means any corporation or other entity of which 50% or more of the outstanding voting stock or voting ownership interest is directly or indirectly owned or controlled by the Company or by one or more Subsidiaries of the Company. The term “Subsidiary” includes present and future Subsidiaries of the Company.

2.332.34    Termination” or “Cessation (and similar terms, regardless of whether expressed in this Plan using the capitalized terms Termination or Cessation) of an Employee’s employment, or of a Director’s service or status as a Director, as applicable, shall be considered to occur on the date on which thean Employee is no longer obligated to perform services as an Employee for the Company or any of its Subsidiaries and the Employee’s right to re-employment is not guaranteed by statute, contract or written policy of the Company or a Subsidiary, or a Director ceases to be a Director, as applicable, regardless of whether the Employee or Director continues to receive compensation from the Company or any of its Subsidiaries for past services after such date. The following shall not be considered such a terminationTermination or cessation:Cessation: (i) a transfer of an employeeEmployee or Director among the Company and its Subsidiaries; (ii) a leave of absence, duly authorized in writing by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, as applicable, for military service or for any other purpose approved by the Company or any of its Subsidiary, as applicable, if the period of such leave does not exceed 90ninety (90) days; (iii) a leave of absence in excess of 90ninety (90) days, duly authorized in writing by the Company, or any of its Subsidiaries, provided that, in the


employee’s case of an Employee, the Employee’s right to re-employment is guaranteed by statute, contract or written policy of the Company;Company or any of its Subsidiaries; or (iv) a termination of employment as an officerwith the Company or any of its Subsidiaries with continued service as a Director or termination of service as a Director with continued services as an EmployeeEmployee. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this definition, with respect to any Equity-Based Award that constitutes a “nonqualified deferred compensation plan” subject to Section 409A of the Code, a Participant shall not be considered to have experienced a “Termination” of employment or director.“Cessation” of service unless the Participant has experienced a “separation from service” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code.


SECTION 3

Administration

3.1    Power and Authority. The Committee shall administer the Plan. The Committee may delegate any, some or all of its record keeping, calculation, payment and other ministerial or administrative authority and responsibility from time to time to and among one or more individuals, who may be members of the Committee or Employees, but all actions taken pursuant to delegated authority and responsibility shall be subject to such review, change and approval by the Committee as the Committee considers appropriate. Except as limited in the Plan or as may be necessary to ensure, to the extent that the Committee so desires, that the Plan provides Performance-Based Compensation, the Committee shall have all of the express and implied powers and duties set forth in the Bylawsbylaws of the Company and the Plan, shall have full power and authority to interpret the provisions of the Plan and Equity-Based Awards granted under the Plan and shall have full power and authority to supervise the administration of the Plan and Equity-Based Awards granted under the Plan and to make all other determinations and do all things considered necessary or advisable for the administration of the Plan. All determinations, interpretations and selections made by the Committee regarding the Plan shall be final and conclusive. The Committee shall hold its meetings at such times and places as it considers advisable. Action may be taken by a written instrument signed by all of the members of the Committee and any action so taken shall be fully as effective as if it had been taken at a meeting duly called and held. The Committee shall make such rules and regulations for the conduct of its business as it considers advisable.

3.2    Grants or Awards to Participants. In accordance with and subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Committee shall have the authority to determine all provisions of Equity-Based Awards as the Committee may consider necessary or desirable and as are consistent with the terms of the Plan, including, without limitation, the following: (a) the persons who shall be selected as Participants; (b) the nature and, subject to the limitations set forth in Sections 4.1 and 4.3 of the Plan, extent of the Equity-Based Awards to be made to each Participant (including the number of shares of Common Stock to be subject to each Equity-Based Award, any exercise price, the manner in which an Equity-Based Award will vest or become exercisable and the form of payment for the Equity-Based Award); (c) the time or times when Equity-Based Awards will be granted; (d) the duration of each Equity-Based Award; and (e) the restrictions and other conditions to which payment or vesting of Equity-Based Awards may be subject; provided, however, that a vesting period of at least one year from the date an Equity-Based Award is granted must apply to at least 95% of the Equity-Based Awards granted under this Plan.

3.3    Amendments or Modifications of Equity-Based Awards. Subject to Section 3.4 and Section 11, the Committee shall have the authority to amend or modify the terms of any outstanding Equity-Based Award in any manner, provided that the amended or modified terms are not prohibited by the Plan as then in effect and provided such actions do not cause an Equity-Based Award not already subject to Section 409A of the Code to become subject to Section 409A of the Code, including, without limitation, the authority to: (a) modify the number of shares or other terms and conditions of an Equity-Based Award; provided that any increase in the number of shares of an Equity-Based Award other than pursuant to Section 4.4 shall be considered to be


a new grant with respect to such additional shares for purposes of Section 409A of the Code and such new grant shall be made at Market Value on the date of grant; (b) extend the term of an Equity-Based Award to a date that is no later than the earlier of the latest date upon which the Equity-Based Award could have expired by its terms under any circumstances or the 10th anniversary of the date of grant (for purposes of clarity, as permitted under Section 409A of the Code, if the term of a Stock Option is extended at a time when the Stock Option exercise price equals or exceeds the Market Value, it will not be an extension of the term of the Stock Option, but instead will be treated as a modification of the Stock Option and a new Stock Option will be treated as having been granted);grant; (c) accelerate the exercisability or vesting or otherwise terminate, waive or modify any restrictions relating to an Equity-Based Award; (d) accept the surrender of any outstanding Equity-Based Award; and (e) to the extent not previously exercised or vested, authorize the grant of new Equity-Based Awards in substitution for surrendered Equity-Based Awards; provided, however,, that such grant of new Equity-Based Awards shall be considered to be a new grant for purposes ofis in compliance with Code Section 409A of the Code and shall be made at Market Value on the date of grant.409A.

3.4    Repricing Prohibited. Except for adjustments as permitted by Section 4.4, without the approval of shareholders, the Committee may not amend, replace, substitute, or exchange previously granted Equity-Based Awards in a transaction that constitutes a “repricing,” which means any of the following: (a) changing the terms of an Equity-Based Awards to lower its exercise price; (b) any other action that is treated as a “repricing” under generally accepted accounting principles; (c) repurchasing for cash or canceling Equity-Based Awards at a time when its exercise price is greater than the Market Value of the underlying shares of Common Stock in exchange for another Equity-Based Award; or (d) as such term is used in NasdaqNASDAQ FAQ Identification Number


220. In addition, the Committee may not cancel any outstanding Stock Option and replace it with a cash payment that is greater than the intrinsic value (if any) of the cancelled Stock Option without shareholder approval.

3.5    Dividends Prohibited. Dividends, or dividend equivalents, may not be paid on any unvested Equity-Based Awards issued under the Plan; provided, that the Committee may provide that dividends, or dividend equivalents, on unvested Equity-Based Awards (other than Stock Options or performance-based Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units) may be accrued and paid upon vesting of the applicable Equity-Based Award. Any Equity-Based Awards that include such accrual rights shall comply with Section 409A of the Code.

3.6    Indemnification of Committee Members. Neither any member or former member of the Committee, nor any individual or group to whom authority or responsibility is or has been delegated, shall be personally responsible or liable for any act or omission in connection with the performance of powers or duties or the exercise of discretion or judgment in the administration and implementation of the Plan. Each person who is or shall have been a member of the Committee, and any other individual or group exercising delegated authority or responsibility with respect to the Plan, shall be indemnified and held harmless by the Company from and against any cost, liability or expense imposed or incurred in connection with such person’s or the Committee’s taking or failing to take any action under the Plan or the exercise of discretion or judgment in the administration and implementation of the Plan. This Section 3.5 shall not be construed as limiting the Company’s or any Subsidiary’s ability to terminate or otherwise alter the terms and conditions of the employment of an individual or group exercising delegated authority or responsibility with respect to the Plan, or to discipline any such person. Each such person shall be justified in relying on information furnished in connection with the Plan’s administration by any appropriate person or persons.


SECTION 4

Shares Subject to the Plan

4.1    Number of Shares. Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4.4 of the Plan, the total number of shares available for Equity-Based Awards under the Plan shall be 1,750,0002,400,000 shares of Common Stock. Not more than 60% of the shares of Common Stock authorized under this Plan may be issued under Equity-Based Awards that are not Stock Options. Such shares shall be authorized and unissued shares, including shares purchased on the open market or otherwise acquired by the Company. Upon shareholder approval of this Plan, no further awards shall be made under the Prior Plans.

4.2    Share Recycling Prohibited. Shares subject to Equity-Based Awards that are canceled, surrendered, modified, exchanged for substitute Equity-Based Awards, or that forfeit, expire or terminate prior to the exercise or vesting of the Equity-Based Awards in full, and shares that are surrendered to the Company in connection with the exercise or vesting of Equity-Based Awards, whether previously owned or otherwise subject to such Equity-Based Awards, may not be reissued as new Equity-Based Awards under the Plan.

4.3Limitation Upon Equity-Based Awards. No Participant shall be granted, during any calendar year, Equity-Based Awards with respect to more than 25% of the total number of shares of Common Stock available for Equity-Based Awards under the Plan set forth in Section 4.1 of the Plan, subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4.4 of the Plan, but only to the extent that such adjustment will not affect the status of any Equity-Based Award theretofore issued or that may thereafter be issued as Performance-Based Compensation. The purpose of this Section 4.3 is to ensure that the Plan may provide Performance-Based Compensation and this Section 4.3 shall be interpreted, administered and amended if necessary to achieve that purpose.Plan.

4.4Adjustments.
4.4Adjustments.

(a)    Stock Dividends and Distributions. If the number of shares of Common Stock outstanding changes by reason of a stock dividend, stock split, recapitalization or other general distribution of Common Stock or other securities


to holders of Common Stock, the number and kind of securities subject to outstanding Equity-Based Awards and available for issuance under the Plan, together with applicable exercise prices and the limitationlimitations provided in Section 4.3, shall be adjusted in such manner and at such time as shall be equitable under the circumstances.circumstances, as determined by the Committee.

(b)    Other Actions Affecting Common Stock. If there occurs, other than as described in Section 4.4(a), any merger, business combination, recapitalization, reclassification, subdivision or combination approved by the Board that would result in the persons who were shareholders of the Company immediately prior to the effective time of any such transaction owning or holding, in lieu of or in addition to shares of Common Stock, other securities, money and/or property (or the right to receive other securities, money and/or property) immediately after the effective time of such transaction, then the outstanding Equity-Based Awards (including exercise prices) and reserves for Equity-Based Awards


under the Plan shall be adjusted in such manner and at such time as shall be equitable under the circumstances.circumstances, as determined by the Committee. It is intended that in the event of any such transaction, Equity-Based Awards under the Plan shall entitle the holder of each Equity-Based Award to receive (upon exercise in the case of Stock Options), in lieu of or in addition to shares of Common Stock, any other securities, money and/or property receivable upon consummation of any such transaction by holders of Common Stock with respect to each share of Common Stock outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of such transaction; upon any such adjustment, holders of Equity-Based Awards under the Plan shall have only the right to receive in lieu of or in addition to shares of Common Stock such other securities, money and/or other property as provided by the adjustment.

(c)    No Fractional Shares. No fractional shares shall be issued pursuant to the Plan. Any fractional shares resulting under the terms of the Plan, including but not limited to, due to adjustments under Section 4.4, partial vesting or tax withholding, shall be rounded up or down as determined in the Committee’s discretion and no cash payment shall be made in lieu of the fractional share.


SECTION 5

Stock Options

5.1    Grant. A Participant may be granted one or more Stock Options under the Plan. No Participant shall have any rights as a shareholder with respect to any shares of stock subject to Stock Options granted hereunder until such shares have been issued. For purposes of determining the number of shares available under the Plan, each Stock Option shall count as the number of shares of Common Stock subject to the Stock Option. Stock Options shall be subject to such terms and conditions, consistent with the other provisions of the Plan, as may be determined by the Committee in its sole discretion. In addition, the Committee may vary, among Participants and among Stock Options granted to the same Participant, any and all of the terms and conditions of the Stock Options granted under the Plan. Subject to the limitation imposed by Section 4.3 of the Plan, the Committee shall have complete discretion in determining the number of Stock Options granted to each Participant. Stock Options issued under the Plan shall be nonqualified stock options and shall not be considered incentive stock options as defined in Section 422(b) of the Code. The date of grant of a Stock Option shall be the date the Stock Option is authorized by the Committee or a future date specified by the Committee as the date for issuing the Stock Option.

5.2    Stock Option Agreements. Stock Options shall be evidenced by stock option agreements, certificates of award, or both, containing the terms and conditions applicable to such Stock Options. To the extent not covered by a stock option agreement or certificate of award, the terms and conditions of this Section 5 shall govern.

5.3    Stock Option Exercise Price. The per share Stock Option exercise price shall be determined by the Committee, but shall be a price that is equal to or greater than 100% of the Market Value per share on the date of grant. The date of grant of a Stock Option shall be the date the Stock Option is authorized by the Committee or a future date specified by the Committee as the date for issuing the Stock Option.

5.4    Medium and Time of Payment. The exercise price for each share purchased pursuant to a Stock Option granted under the Plan shall be payable in cash or, if the Committee consents or provides in the applicable stock option agreement or grant, in shares of Common Stock.Stock (for the avoidance for doubt, including by the Participant instructing the Company to withhold a number of shares of Common Stock having a Market Value on the date the applicable Stock Option is exercised equal to the product of (a) the exercise price multiplied by (b) the number of shares of Common Stock in respect of which the Stock Option is being exercised). Broker-assisted cashless exercise of Stock Options is permitted under the Plan, provided that it is effectuated in a manner that does not violate the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 or other laws, rules or regulations. The time and terms of payment may be amended with the consent of a Participant before or after exercise of a Stock Option, provided that such amendment would not cause a Stock Option to become subject to Section 409A of the Code. Except as limited by the Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 or other laws, rules or regulations, the Committee may from time to time authorize payment of all or a portion of the Stock Option exercise price in the form of a promissory note or other deferred payment installments according to such terms as the


Committee may approve; provided, however, that such promissory note or other deferred payment installments shall be with full recourse and shall bear a market rate of interest. The Board may restrict or suspend the power of the Committee to permit such loans and may require that adequate security be provided. The Committee may implement a program for the broker-assisted cashless exercise of Stock Options.

5.5    Limits on Exercisability. Stock Options shall be exercisable for such periods, not to exceed 10 years and one day from the date of grant, as may be fixed by the Committee. At the time of exercise of a Stock Option, the holder of the Stock Option, if requested by the Committee, must represent to the Company that the shares are being acquired for investment and not with a view to the distribution thereof. The Committee may in its discretion require a Participant to continue the Participant’s service with the Company or its Subsidiaries for a certain length of time prior to a Stock Option becoming exercisable and may eliminate such delayed vesting provisions.

5.6    Termination of Employment.Employment or Cessation of Service. Unless the Committee otherwise consentsspecified in a Participant’s Equity-Based Award Agreement or permits (before or after the stock option grant) or unless the stock option agreement or grant provides otherwise:Individual Agreement:



(a)    General. If a Participant ceases to be a Director or ceases to be employed by the Company or one of its Subsidiary for any reason, the Participant’s outstanding Stock Options that have not vested by the date of Termination or Cessation shall be forfeited. If a Participant ceases to be a Director or is no longer employed by the Company or one of its Subsidiary for any reason other than the Participant’s Retirement, death, Disability or terminationTermination for cause,Cause, the Participant may exercise his or her Stock Options in accordance with their terms for a period not exceeding the earlier of the expiration of the Stock Options by their terms and three months after such terminationTermination of employment or Cessation of service as a Director, but only to the extent the Participant was entitled to exercise the Stock Options on the date of termination.Termination.

(b)    Death. If a Participant dies either while an Employee or Director otherwise during a time when the Participant could have exercised a Stock Option, the Stock Options issued to such Participant shall be exercisable in accordance with their terms by the personal representative of such Participant or other successor to the interest of the Participant for a period of one year after such Participant’s death to the extent that the Participant was entitled to exercise the Stock Options on the date of death or termination,Termination or Cessation, whichever first occurred, but not beyond the original term of the Stock Options.

(c)    Disability. If a Participant ceases to be a Director or ceases to be employed by the Company or one of its Subsidiaries due to the Participant’s Disability, he or she may exercise his or her Stock Options in accordance with their terms for one year after he or she ceases to be a Director or employed unless such Stock Options earlier expire by their terms, but only to the extent that the Participant was entitled to exercise the Stock Options on the date of such event and not beyond the original terms of the Stock Options.

(d)    Participant Retirement. If a Participant no longer serves as a Director or ceases to be employed by the Company or one of its Subsidiaries due to Retirement, the Participant may exercise his or her Stock Options in accordance with their terms for three years after such terminationTermination of employment or Cessation of service unless such Stock Options earlier expire by their terms.

(e)    Termination for Cause. If a Participant’s service as a Director or employment is terminated for cause,Cause, the Participant shall have no further right to exercise any Stock Options previously granted to him or her. The Committee or officers designated by the Committee shall have absolute discretion to determine whether a termination is for cause.


SECTION 6

Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units
6.1    Grant. Subject to the limitations set forth in Sections 4.1 and 4.3 of the Plan, Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units may be granted to Participants under the Plan. Shares of Restricted Stock are shares of Common Stock the retention, vesting and/or transferability of which is subject, during specified periods of time, to such conditions (including continued employment, service as a Director and/or achievement of performance goals established by the Committee) and terms as the Committee deems appropriate. Restricted Stock Units are Equity-Based Awards denominated in units of Common Stock under which the issuance of shares of Common Stock is subject to such conditions (including continued employment, service as a Director and/or achievement of performance goals established by the Committee) and terms as the Committee deems appropriate. For purposes of determining the number of shares available under the Plan, each Restricted Stock Unit shall count as the number of shares of Common Stock subject to the Restricted Stock Unit. Unless determined otherwise by the Committee, each Restricted Stock Unit shall be equal to one share of Common Stock and shall entitle a Participant to either shares of Common Stock or an


amount of cash determined with reference to the value of shares of Common Stock. To the extent determined by the Committee, Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units may be satisfied or settled in cash, in shares of Common Stock or in a combination thereof. Unless specified otherwise in an Equity-Based Award Agreement or other superseding agreement, Restricted Stock Units shall be settled within 30 days following satisfaction of the applicable vesting requirements, subject to any delay required by Section 409A of the Code. Restricted Stock Units that are Performance-Based Compensation shall be settled no later than the 15th day of the third month after the Restricted Stock Units vest. Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units granted pursuant to the Plan need not be identical but shall be consistent with the terms of the Plan.

6.2    Restricted Stock Agreements. Awards of Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units shall be evidenced by restricted stock or restricted stock unit agreements or certificates of award containing such terms and conditions, consistent with the provisions of the Plan, as the Committee shall from time to time determine. Unless the restricted stock or restricted stock unit agreement or certificate of award provides otherwise, awards of Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units shall be subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Section 6.

6.3    Vesting. The grant, issuance, retention, vesting and settlement of shares of Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units shall occur at such time and in such installments as determined by the Committee or under criteria established by the Committee. The Committee shall have the right to make the timing of the grant and/or issuance of, the ability to retain and the vesting and/or the settlement of Restricted Stock Units and shares of Restricted Stock subject to continued employment, passage of time and/or such performance criteria as deemed appropriate by the Committee.



6.4    Termination of Employment or Cessation of Service. Unless the Committee otherwise consentsspecified in a Participant’s Equity-Based Award Agreement or permits (before or after the grant of Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units) or unless the restricted stock or restricted stock unit agreement or grant provides otherwise:Individual Agreement:

(a)    Voluntary Termination Other Than Retirement. Other than as provided below upon Retirement, if a Participant voluntarily ceases to be an Employee, or if a Participant who is a directorDirector voluntarily ceases to be a director,Director, for any reason during the Restricted Period, each share of Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Unit still subject in full or in part to restrictions at the date of such terminationTermination or Cessation shall automatically be forfeited and returned to the Company.

(b)    Death, Disability or Termination Without Cause. In the event a Participant terminates his or her employment with the Company or one of its Subsidiaries, or a directorDirector ceases to be a director of the Company,Director, because of death, Disability or terminationTermination without causeCause during the Restricted Period, the restrictions remaining on any or all shares of Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units shall terminate automatically with respect to that respectivelapse and such award shall vest on a prorated basis and be convertible into a number of such shares of Common Stock equal to (i) the number of the Participant’s shares of unvested Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units (rounded toas of the nearest whole number) equal toeffective date of the respective total numberTermination, multiplied by (ii) the quotient of such shares or Restricted Stock Units granted to such Participant multiplied by(x) the number of full months that have elapsed since the later of the date of grant divided byor the most recent annual vesting date and the effective date of Participant’s Termination and (y) the total number of full months remaining in the respective Restricted Period; provided,that if suchvesting period since the later of the date of grant or the most recent annual vesting date. For Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units that are subject to attainment of performance goals, then the restrictions shall not lapse until the endnumber of a Participant’s unvested Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units that are subject to proration as of the applicable performance period and then only after it is determined thateffective date of the CompanyTermination as set forth in the immediately preceding sentence shall have attained such performance goals.be the target (100%) number of Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units set forth in the Equity-Based Award Agreement. All remaining shares of Restricted Stock shall be forfeited and returned to the Company and all remaining Restricted Stock Units shall be forfeited; provided, that the Committee may, in its sole discretion, waive the restrictions remaining on any or all of such remaining shares of Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units either before or after the death, Disability or terminationTermination without causeCause of the Participant.

(c)    Retirement. If a Participant who is a directorDirector ceases providing services as a directorDirector due to Retirement during the Restricted Period, then the restrictions remaining on any or all shares of Restricted Stock shall terminate automatically in full upon Retirement. In the event a Participant who is an Employee terminates his or her employment with the Company or any one of its Subsidiaries because of Retirement during the Restricted Period:

(i)Performance-Based Vesting. For Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units that are subject to attainment of performance goals, ifPeriod and the Participant has given the Company or its Subsidiary, as applicable, written notice of the Participant’shis or her intended date of Retirement at least one year in advance of such intended date of Retirement, and it is determined after the end of the applicable performance period that the Company attained the applicable performance goals, then the restrictions remaining on any or all such shares of Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units shall terminate automatically with respect to that respectivelapse and such award shall vest on a prorated basis and be convertible into a number of such shares or Restrictedof Common Stock Units (rounded to the nearest whole number) equal to the respective total number of such shares or Restricted Stock Units granted to such Participant multiplied by the number of full months that have elapsed since the date of grant divided by the total number of full months in the respective Restricted Period.manner described in Section 6.4(b) of the Plan. If the Participant does not provide such advance notice, then all remaining shares of Restricted Stock shall be forfeited and returned to the Company and all remaining Restricted Stock Units shall be forfeited.

(ii)Time-Based Vesting. If the Participant has given the Company written notice of the Participant’s intended date of Retirement at least one year in advance of such intended date of Retirement, then the restrictions remaining on any or all shares of Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units that are subject solely to time-based vesting shall terminate automatically in full upon Retirement. If the Participant does not provide such advance notice, then all remaining shares of Restricted Stock shall be forfeited and returned to the Company and all remaining Restricted Stock Units shall be forfeited.

The Committee may, in its sole discretion, waive the restrictions remaining on any or all such remaining shares of Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units either before or after the Retirement of the Participant.



(d)    Termination for Cause. If a Participant’s employment or service as a directorDirector is terminatedTerminated for cause,Cause, the Participant shall have no further right to receive any Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units and all Restricted Stock still subject to restrictions at the date of such terminationTermination shall automatically be forfeited and returned to the Company and all Restricted Stock Units still subject to restrictions at the date of such terminationTermination shall automatically be forfeited. For purposes of the Plan, the Committee or officers designated by the Committee shall have absolute discretion to determine whether a termination is for cause.



6.5    Legending of Restricted Stock. In addition to any other legend that may be set forth on a Participant’s share certificate, such certificates, if any, evidencing shares of Restricted Stock awarded pursuant to the Plan shall bear the following legend:

The shares represented by this certificate were issued subject to certain restrictions under the Chemical Financial Corporation Stock Incentive Plan of 20172019 (the “Plan”). This certificate is held subject to the terms and conditions contained in a restricted stock agreement that includes a prohibition against the sale or transfer of the stock represented by this certificate except in compliance with that agreement, and thatwhich provides for forfeiture upon certain events. Copies of the Plan and the restricted stock agreement are on file in the office of the Secretary of the Company.

The Committee may require that certificates, if any, representing shares of Restricted Stock be retained and held in escrow by a designated employee or agent of the Company or any Subsidiary until any restrictions applicable to shares of Restricted Stock so retained have been satisfied or lapsed.

6.6    Rights as a Shareholder. A Participant shall have all liquidation and other rights with respect to Restricted Stock held of record by such Participant as if the Participant held unrestricted Common Stock, subject to the restrictions regarding payment of dividends as set forth in Section 3.5; provided, that the unvested portion of any award of Restricted Stock shall be subject to any restrictions on transferability or risks of forfeiture imposed pursuant to this Section 6 and the terms and conditions set forth in the Participant’s restricted stock agreement. Unless the Committee otherwise determines or unless the terms of the applicable restricted stock unit agreement or grant provide otherwise, a Participant shall have no dividend or liquidation rights with respect to shares of Common Stock subject to awards of Restricted Stock Units held by such Participant.

6.7    Voting Rights. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, Participants holding shares of Restricted Stock granted hereunder may exercise full voting rights with respect to those shares during the Restricted Period. Participants shall have no voting rights with respect to shares of Common Stock underlying Restricted Stock Units unless and until such shares are reflected as issued and outstanding shares on the Company’s stock ledger.


SECTION 7

Stock-Based Awards

7.1    Grant. Subject to the limitations set forth in Sections 4.1 and 4.3 of the Plan, in addition to any Stock Options, Restricted Stock, or Restricted Stock Units that a Participant may be granted under the Plan, a Participant may be granted one or more other types of awards based on or related to shares of Common Stock (including the grant of Stock Awards). Such awards shall be subject to such terms and conditions, consistent with the other provisions of the Plan, as may be determined from time to time by the Committee in its sole discretion.discretion, and shall be evidenced by agreements or certificates of award containing such terms and conditions. Notwithstanding the previous sentence, the shares of stock subject to Stock Awards shall be issued no later than the 15th day of the third month after the end of the calendar year in which the award is granted.vested. Such awards shall be expressed in terms of shares of Common Stock or denominated in units of Common Stock. For purposes of determining the number of shares available under the Plan, each such unit shall count as the number of shares of Common Stock to which it relates.

7.2    Rights as a Shareholder.

(a)    Stock Awards. A Participant shall have all voting, dividend, liquidation and other rights with respect to vested shares of Common Stock issued to the Participant as a Stock Award under this Section 7 upon the Participant becoming the holder of record of the Common Stock granted pursuant to such Stock Award; provided, that the Committee may impose such restrictions on the assignment or transfer of Common Stock awarded pursuant to a Stock Award as it considers appropriate. Any dividend payment with respect to a vested Stock Award shall be made no later than the 15th day of the third month following the date the dividends are paid to shareholders.

(b)    General. With respect to shares of Common Stock subject to awards granted under the Plan other than Stock Options, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units and Stock Awards, a Participant shall have such rights as


determined by the Committee and set forth in the respective award agreements; and the Committee may impose such restrictions on the assignment or transfer of Common Stock awarded pursuant to such awards as it considers appropriate.




SECTION 8

Change in Control

Unless otherwise specified in a Participant’s Equity-Based Award Agreement or Individual Agreement, upon and following a Change in Control the following terms shall apply to all Equity-Based Awards granted under the Plan.

8.1    Continued Vesting of Equity-Based Awards. Following a Change in Control, all Equity-Based Awards Assumed or Substitutedgranted under the Plan that are outstanding at the time of the Change in Control and have not previously vested shall continue to vest in accordance with the vesting provisions and Restricted Period in effect immediately prior to the Change in Control, except as otherwise contemplated by Surviving Entity.this Section 8. Following a Change in Control, and after giving effect to the provisions of this Section 8, a Participant’s rights in respect of Retirement, death and Disability as set forth in the Plan, including any prorated vesting of unvested Equity-Based Awards, shall continue to apply.

8.2Settlement of Performance-Based Equity-Based Awards. With respect to Equity-Based Awards assumed byRestricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units granted under the surviving entity or otherwise equitably converted or substitutedPlan that remain subject to the attainment of Performance Measures for which performance results have not been measured in connection withthe ordinary course prior to such Change in Control, upon the effective date of a Change in Control: unless otherwise provided forControl, the number of shares subject to the applicable Equity-Based Award Agreement from and after the date of the consummation of the Change in Control be equal to the greater of (a) the target (100% payout) number of shares of Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units set forth in the terms of any award agreement or separate agreement with a Participant governing anapplicable Equity-Based Award ifAgreement, and (b) the number of shares of Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units that would have been earned based on or within two years afterthe actual performance of the Company measured through the latest practicable date prior to the effective date of the Change in Control a Participant’s employment is involuntarily terminated other than for cause or(which, unless otherwise determined by the Participant terminates employment for Good Reason, then:

(a)Time-Based Vesting. Committee, shall be the most recently completed calendar quarter) (such higher number, the “Earned Performance-Based Awards”). All time-based vesting restrictions on that Participant’s outstanding Equity-Based Awardsremaining shares of Restricted Stock shall lapse;

(b)Performance-Based Vesting. The payout level underbe forfeited and returned to the Company, and all remaining Restricted Stock Units shall be forfeited. Following the date of that Participant’s performance-based Equity-Based Awards that were outstanding immediately before the effective timeconsummation of the Change in Control, the Earned Performance-Based Awards shall vest and be determined and deemedsubject to have been earned as of the date of termination of employmentforfeiture based upon the actual level of achievement of all relevant performance goals against target (measured as of the termination of employment), to be paid on a pro-rata basis to such Participants at a time to be determined inParticipant’s continued service through the Company’s sole discretion but no later than the 15thlast day of the third month following the date of termination of employment (unless a later date is required pursuant to Section 409A of the Code), based upon the portion of the Performance Period completed before the date of termination of employment; andPeriod.

(c)8.3    Stock Options. AllConversion of that Participant’s outstanding Stock Options shall become fully exercisable and shall thereafter continue or lapse in accordance with the other provisions of the Plan and the award agreement.

8.2Equity-BasedAwards Not Assumed or Substituted by Surviving Entity. With respect to Equity-Based Awards that areif Not the Surviving Entity. If the Company is not assumed by the surviving entity or otherwise equitably converted or substituted in connection withfollowing the Change in Control in a manner approved by the Committee or the Board, and unless otherwise provided for in the terms of any award agreement or separate agreement with a Participant governing an Equity-Based Award, then upon the occurrenceeffective date of a Change in Control:

(a)Time-Based Vesting. The valueControl, all outstanding and unvested shares of all time-based Equity-Based Awards that were outstanding immediately before the effective timeRestricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units shall (after giving effect to Section 8.2 of the Change in Control shallPlan, to the extent applicable) be determined asconverted into Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units of the date of the Change in Control. Such amount shall remain subject to the vesting schedule ofsurviving entity’s common stock at the applicable time-based Equity-Based Award and will be paid in cash (without interest) to such Participants when the applicable time-based Equity-Based Awards otherwise would have vested if the Participant remains employed with the surviving entity at that time or earlier upon the Participant’s involuntary termination of employment without cause or termination of employment for Good Reason;

(b)Performance-Based Vesting. The value of all performance-based Equity-Based Awards that were outstanding immediately before the effective time of the Change in Control shall be determined as ofexchange ratio on the date of the Change in Control based upon the actual level of achievement of all relevant performance goals against target (measured(or shall be otherwise adjusted as contemplated by Section 4.4(b) of the time ofPlan) in a manner approved by the Change in Control), to be calculated on a pro-rata basis based upon the portion of the Performance Period completed before the date of Change in Control. Such amount will be paid in cash (without interest) to such Participants after the end of the Performance Period and any applicable service period that otherwise would have applied under the terms of the Equity-Based Awards if the Participant remains employed with the surviving entity at that time or earlier upon the Participant’s involuntary termination of employment without cause or termination of employment for Good Reason; and

(c)Stock Options.Board. The value of all outstanding Stock Options shall be converted to a cash amount (which shall be received upon exercise, in lieu of shares of Common Stock or other securities or consideration) equal to the greater of the excess of (i)(a) the highest sales price of the sharesCompany’s Common Stock on Nasdaq on the date immediately prior to the effective date of such Change in Control of the Company or (ii)(b) the highest price per share actually paid in by the acquirer in connection with any Change in Control of the Company, over the exercise price per share of such Stock Options. Such amount shall remain subject to the vesting schedule of the applicable Stock Option and willshall be paid in cash (without interest) when the applicable Stock Option otherwise would have vested ifin accordance with the applicable Equity-Based Award Agreement.

8.4Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason. If, during the two-year period following the effective date of a Change in Control, a Participant’s employment with the Company and/or its Subsidiaries is involuntarily terminated without Cause or a Participant terminates such employment for Good Reason, all unvested Equity-Based Awards granted to the Participant remains employed withunder the Plan shall vest in full on the Termination date of the Participant, subject to the settlement determination and conversion provisions set forth in Sections 8.2 and 8.3 of the Plan. Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units that vest pursuant to this Section 8.4 shall be converted into shares of Common Stock (or the common stock of the surviving entity, at that time or earlier uponas applicable) and shall be issued to the Participant within thirty (30) days following the Participant’s involuntary terminationTermination date, subject to any required delay pursuant to Section 409A of employment without cause or terminationthe Code. Stock Options that vest pursuant to this Section 8.4 shall be exercisable for the full remaining term of employment for Good Reason.the Stock Options as set forth in the applicable Equity-Based Award Agreements.




SECTION 9

Performance Measures

9.1    Performance Measures. Unless and until theSubject to Committee proposes for shareholder vote and the shareholders approve a change in the general Performance Measuresdiscretion as set forth in this Section 9, thea Participant’s Equity-Based Award Agreement or other controlling document, performance goals upon which the payment or vesting of an Equity-Based Award to a Covered Employee that isare intended to qualify asbe Performance-Based Compensation may be basedshall beinclude, but are not limited to, the following Performance Measures:

(a)Net income (before or after taxes, interest, depreciation, and/or amortization);
(b)Net income per share;
(c)Return on equity;
(d)Cash earnings;
(e)Cash earnings per share (reflecting dilution of the Common Stock as the Committee deems appropriate and, if the Committee so determines, net of or including dividends);
(f)Cash earnings return on equity;
(g)Operating income;
(h)Operating income per share;
(i)Operating income return on equity;
(j)Return on assets;
(k)Cash flow;
(l)Cash flow return on capital;
(m)Return on capital;
(n)Productivity ratios;
(o)Share price (including without limitation growth measures, total shareholder return or comparison to indices);
(p)Expense or cost levels;
(q)Margins;
(r)Operating efficiency;
(s)Efficiency ratio;
(t)Customer satisfaction, satisfaction based on specified objective goals or a Company-sponsored customer survey;
(u)Economic value added measurements;
(v)Market share or market penetration with respect to specific designated products or services, product or service groups and/or specific geographic areas;
(w)Reduction of losses, loss ratios, expense ratios or fixed costs;
(x)Employee turnover;
(y)Specified objective social goals;
(z)Noninterest income;
(aa)Interest income;
(bb)Net interest income;
(cc)Deposit growth; and
(dd)Loan growth.

One or more Performance Measures may be used to measure the performance of one or more of the Company, its Subsidiaries, its Affiliates, or any combination of the foregoing, compared to pre-determined levels, as the Committee may deem appropriate, or compared to the performance of a pre-established peer group, or published or special index that the Committee, in its sole discretion, deems appropriate. The Committee also has the authority to provide for accelerated vesting of any Equity-Based Award based on the achievement of performance goals pursuant to the Performance Measures specified in this Section 9.

9.2    Evaluation of Performance. TheWith respect to any Equity-Based Award granted under the Plan, the Committee may providedetermine in any such Equity-Based Awardits sole discretion that any evaluation of Performance may include or exclude any of the following events or their effects that occursoccur during a Performance Period: (a) asset write-downs,write-downs; (b) litigation or claim judgments or settlements,settlements; (c) changes in tax laws, accounting principles, or other laws or provisions affecting reported results,results; (d) any reorganization and restructuring programs,programs; (e) extraordinary nonrecurring items as described in Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 225-20 and/or in management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations appearing in the Company’s annual report to shareholders for the applicable fiscal year,year; (f) acquisitions, mergers, or divestitures (including non-recurring transaction-related expenses); (g) securities offerings; (h) accounting changes,changes; (i) amortization of goodwill or other intangible assets,assets; (j) discontinued operations,operations; and (k) other special charges or extraordinary items. To the extent such inclusions or exclusions affect Equity-Based Awards to Covered Employees, they shall be prescribed in a form that meets the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code for deductibility.



9.3    Committee Discretion. In the event thatof changes to applicable tax laws, securities laws or both, changeand accounting principles, in addition to permitits authority under Section 9.2, the Committee discretion tomay alter the governing Performance Measures without obtaining shareholder approval of such changes, the Committee shall have sole discretion to make such changes without obtaining shareholder approval. In addition, in the event that the Committee determines that it is advisable to grant Equity-Based Awards that shall not qualify as Performance-Based Compensation, the Committee may make such grants without satisfying the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code and may base vesting on Performance Measures other than those set forth in Section 9.1.changes.

9.4    Adjustment of Performance-Based Compensation. Equity-Based Awards that are designed to qualify asbe Performance-Based Compensation and that are held by Covered Employees,pursuant to Section 9 of the Plan may not be increased or adjusted upward. The Committee shall retain the discretion to decrease or adjust such Equity-Based Awards downward, and such Equity-Based Awards may be forfeited in whole or in part.

9.5    Performance-Based Compensation Conditioned on Performance. Payment of Performance-Based Compensation to a Participant for a Performance Period under this Plan shall be entirely contingent upon achievement of the performance goals established by the Committee pursuant to this Section 9, the satisfaction of which must be substantially uncertain when established by the Committee for the Performance Period.

9.6    Time of Determination of Performance Goals by Committee. All performance goals to be made by the Committee for a Performance Period pursuant to this Section 9 shall be established in writing by the Committee during the first 90 days of such Performance Period and before 25% of the Performance Period has elapsed.

9.7    Objective Standards. Performance-Based Compensation shall be based solely upon objective criteria, consistent with this Section 9, from which an independent third party with knowledge of the facts could determine whether the performance goal or range of goals is met and from that determination could calculate the Performance-Based Compensation to be paid. Although the Committee has authority to exercise reasonable discretion to interpret this Plan and the criteria it shall specify pursuant to this Section 9 of the Plan, it may not amend or waive such criteria after the 90th day of the respective Performance Period with respect to an Equity-Based Award intended to qualify asbe Performance-Based Compensation. The Committee shall have no authority or discretion to increase any Performance-Based Compensation or to construct, modify or apply the measurement of a Participant’s Performance in a manner that will directly or indirectly increase the Performance-Based Compensation for the Participant for any Performance Period above the amount determined by the applicable objective standards established within the time period set forth in Section 9.6.


SECTION 10

General Provisions

10.1    Restrictions on Transferability; Clawback and Recoupment.

(a)    General. Unless the Committee otherwise consents or permits (before or after the Equity-Based Award is made) or unless the award agreementEquity-Based Award Agreement provides otherwise, Equity-Based Awards granted under the Plan may not be sold, exchanged, transferred, pledged, assigned or otherwise alienated or hypothecated except by will or the laws of descent and distribution, and, as a condition to any transfer permitted by the Committee or the terms of the award agreement, the transferee must execute a written agreement permitting the Company to satisfy any federal, state or local withholding or other taxes associated with or resulting from the exercise or vesting of any Equity-Based Award in any manner provided for in Section 10.3. All provisions of an Equity-Based Award that are determined with reference to the Participant, including without limitation those that refer to the Participant’s employment or service as a Director with the Company or any one of its Subsidiaries, shall continue to be determined with reference to the Participant after any transfer of an Equity-Based Award. All rights with respect to Equity-Based Awards granted to a Participant under the Plan shall be exercisable during the Participant’s lifetime only by such Participant or his or her guardian or legal representative.

(b)    Other Restrictions. The Committee may impose other restrictions on any Equity-Based Award or shares of Common Stock acquired pursuant to the exercise or settlement of an Equity-Based Award under the Plan as the Committee deems advisable, including, without limitation, holding periods or further transfer restrictions, forfeiture provisions, and restrictions under applicable federal or state securities laws.

(c)    Clawback and Recoupment. Equity-Based Awards under the Plan shall be subject to the Company'sCompany’s “clawback” policy for the recovery and recoupment of incentive compensation, as it may be amended from time to time.



10.2    No Rights to Equity-Based Awards. No Participant or other person shall have any claim to be granted any Equity-Based Award under the Plan and there is no obligation of uniformity of treatment of Participants or holders or beneficiaries of Equity-Based Awards under the Plan. The terms and conditions of Equity-Based Awards of the same type and the determination


of the Committee to grant a waiver or modification of any Equity-Based Award and the terms and conditions thereof need not be the same with respect to each Participant or the same Participant.

10.3    Withholding. The Company or a Subsidiary shall be entitled to: (a) withhold and deduct from future wages of a Participant (or from other amounts that may be due and owing to a Participant from the Company or a Subsidiary), or make other arrangements for the collection of, all legally required amounts necessary to satisfy any and all federal, state, local and foreign withholding and employment-related tax requirements attributable to an Equity-Based Award, including, without limitation, the grant, exercise or vesting of, or payment of dividends with respect to, an Equity-Based Award; or (b) require a Participant promptly to remit the amount of such withholding to the Company or the Subsidiary, as applicable, before taking any action with respect to an Equity-Based Award. Unless the Committee determines otherwise, withholding may be satisfied by withholding Common Stock to be received upon exercise or vesting of an Equity-Based Award or by delivery to the Company of previously owned Common Stock. The Company and any Subsidiary may establish such rules and procedures concerning timing of any withholding election as it deems appropriate.

10.4    Compliance With Laws; Listing and Registration of Shares. All Equity-Based Awards granted under the Plan (and all issuances of Common Stock or other securities under the Plan) shall be subject to all applicable laws, rules and regulations, and to the requirement that if at any time the Committee shall determine, in its discretion, that the listing, registration or qualification of the shares covered thereby upon any securities exchange or under any state or federal law, or the consent or approval of any governmental regulatory body, is necessary or desirable as a condition of, or in connection with, the grant of such Equity-Based Award or the issuance or purchase of shares thereunder, such Equity-Based Award may not be exercised in whole or in part, or the restrictions on such Equity-Based Award shall not lapse, unless and until such listing, registration, qualification, consent or approval shall have been effected or obtained free of any conditions not acceptable to the Committee.

10.5    No Limit on Other Compensation Arrangements. Nothing contained in the Plan shall prevent the Company or any Subsidiary from adopting or continuing in effect other or additional compensation arrangements, including the grant of Stock Options and other stock-based and stock-related awards, and such arrangements may be either generally applicable or applicable only in specific cases.

10.6    No Right to Employment. The grant of an Equity-Based Award shall not be construed as giving a Participant the right to be retained in the employ of the Company or any Subsidiary. The Company or any Subsidiary may at any time dismiss a Participant from employment or service, free from any liability or any claim under the Plan, unless otherwise expressly provided in the Plan or in any written agreement with the Participant.

10.7    No Liability of Company. TheNeither the Company, and any Subsidiary, or Affiliate, which is in existence or hereafter comes into existenceEmployee nor Director shall not be liable to a Participant or any other person as to: (a) the non-issuance or non-sale of Common Stock as to which the Company has been unable to obtain from any regulatory body having jurisdiction the authority deemed by the Company’s counsel to be necessary to the lawful issuance and sale of any shares hereunder; (b) any tax consequence to any Participant or other person due to the receipt, exercise or settlement of any Equity-Based Award granted hereunder, including but not limited to any tax treatment under Section 409A of the Code; and (c) any provision of law or legal restriction that prohibits or restricts the transfer of shares of Common Stock issued pursuant to any Equity-Based Award. For the avoidance of doubt, this Section 10.7 shall apply to any Subsidiary or Affiliate in existence or hereafter comes into existence.

10.8    Suspension of Rights under Equity-Based Awards. The Company, by written notice to a Participant, may suspend a Participant’s and any transferee’s rights under any Equity-Based Award for a period not to exceed 60 days while the terminationTermination for causeCause of that Participant’s employment or service with the Company and its Subsidiaries is under consideration.

10.9    Governing Law. The validity, construction and effect of the Plan and any rules and regulations relating to the Plan shall be determined in accordance with the laws of the State of Michigan and applicable federal law.

10.10    Severability. In the event any provision of the Plan shall be held illegal or invalid for any reason, the illegality or invalidity shall not affect the remaining provisions of the Plan and the Plan shall be construed and enforced as if the illegal or invalid provision had not been included, unless such construction would cause the Plan to fail in its essential purposes.

10.11    Compliance with 409A. The Plan isand Equity Based Awards granted hereunder are intended to provide Equity-Based Awards that are exempt fromcomply with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code as either exempt equity awards under Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-1(b)(5) or as exempt short-term deferrals under Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-1(b)(4),an exemption or exclusion therefrom, and, iswith respect to be interpreted and operated consistently with those intentions.  To the extentany Equity Based Awards that the Committee determines that any Equity-Based Award granted hereunder isconstitute deferred compensation subject to Section 409A of the


Code, the agreement evidencing such Equity-BasedPlan, Equity Based Award shall incorporate the termsAgreements and conditions necessary to avoid the tax consequences specified in Section 409A(a)(1) of the Code. To the extent applicable, the Plan and agreementsany Individual Agreement shall be interpreted and administered in all respects in accordance with Section 409A of the Code.Code (including with respect to the application of any defined terms with respect to Equity Based Award Agreements that constitute nonqualified deferred compensation, which defined terms shall be interpreted to have the meaning required by Section 409A of

10.12
the Code to the extent required to avoid accelerated taxation and/or tax penalties under Section 162(m) Delay409A of the Code). AEach payment (including the delivery of shares of Common Stock) under any Equity Based Award that is dueconstitutes nonqualified deferred compensation subject to Section 409A of the Code shall be treated as a separate payment for purposes of Section 409A of the Code and, to the extent to be made or delivered upon a termination of employment or cessation of service may only be made upon a “separation from service” under Section 409A of the Code to the extent necessary to avoid the imposition of penalty taxes on a Participant pursuant to Section 409A of the Code. In no event may a Participant, directly or indirectly, designate the calendar year of any payment to be made under this Plan may be delayed by the Employerthat constitutes nonqualified deferred compensation subject to the extent the Employer, in its sole discretion, reasonably anticipates that if the payment were made as scheduled, the Employer’s deduction with respect to such payment would not be permitted under Section 162(m)409A of the Code. IfNotwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement to the Employer determines thatcontrary, if a paymentParticipant is to be delayed under this paragraph,a “specified employee” within the Employer must determine before the payment is delayed whether the delayed payment will be made either (i) during the first calendar year in which the Employer reasonably anticipates that the deduction of such payment will not be barred by applicationmeaning of Section 162(m)409A of the Code or (ii) during(as determined in accordance with the period beginning withmethodology established by the Company as in effect on the date of a Participant’s separation from service), Equity Based Awards that constitute nonqualified deferred compensation within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code that would otherwise be deliverable by reason of a Participant’s Separation From Service (or later if required by Section 7.3(a) for a Specified Employee) and endingseparation from service during the six-month period immediately following such separation from service shall instead be provided on the laterearlier to occur of: (a) the date that is six months and one day after such Participant’s separation from service; or (b) the date of the last day of the taxable year of the Employer in which the Participant Separates From Service or the 15th day of the third month following thesuch Participant’s Separation From Service. The Employer may only elect to delay payment under this paragraph if all payments scheduled to the Participant under all deferred compensation plans of the Employer that could be delayed under the application of Treasury Regulation § 1.409A-2(b)(7)(i) are delayed.death.


SECTION 11

Termination and Amendment

11.1    Board and Committee Actions. The Board may terminate the Plan at any time or may from time to time amend or alter the Plan or any aspect of it as it considers proper and in the best interests of the Company; provided, that no such amendment may be made, without the approval of shareholders of the Company, that would (i) reduce the exercise price at which Stock Options may be granted below the price provided for in Section 5.3, (ii) reduce the exercise price of outstanding Stock Options, (iii) increase the individual maximum limits in Section 4.3 or (iv)(iii) otherwise amend the Plan in any manner requiring shareholder approval by law or under NASDAQ listing requirements or other applicable NASDAQ rules, and provided further that the Plan may not be amended in any way that causes the Plan to fail to comply with or be exempt from Section 409A of the Code.rules.
11.2    No Impairment. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Section 11.1, no such amendment or alteration to the Plan or to any previously granted award agreement or Equity-Based Award shall be made which would impair the rights of the holder of the Equity-Based Award, without such holder’s consent; provided, that no such consent shall be required if the Committee determines in its sole discretion and prior to the date of any Change in Control that such amendment or alteration is required or advisable in order for the Company, the Plan or the Equity-Based Award to satisfy any law or regulation or to meet the requirements of or avoid adverse financial accounting consequences under any tax or accounting standard, law or regulation.

SECTION 12

Effective Date and Duration of the Plan

The Plan shall take effect April 26, 2017,May 7, 2019, subject to approval by the shareholders at the 20172019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders or any adjournment thereof or at a Special Meeting of Shareholders. Unless earlier terminated by the Board, of Directors, no Equity-Based Award shall be granted under the Plan after April 25, 2027.

May 7, 2029.




proxycardfinal001.jpg






proxycardfinal002a01.jpg